Primary investigation to leveraging effect of using ethanol fuel on reducing gasoline fuel consumption

Fuel

Volumn 105, Issue , 2013, Pages 425-431

  Zhuang, Yuan ^a   Hong, Guang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ethanol direct injection; Gasoline port injection; Leveraging effect; Single cylinder spark ignition engine

Indexed keywords

COMBUSTION EFFICIENCIES; COMBUSTION VELOCITIES; ENERGY RATIO; ENGINE EMISSION; ENGINE LOAD; ENGINE PERFORMANCE; ENGINE SPEED; GASOLINE FUELS; HEATING ENERGY; IN-CYLINDER COMBUSTION; LATENT HEAT OF VAPORIZATION; LEVERAGING EFFECT; PORT INJECTION; SI ENGINES; SINGLE-CYLINDER SPARK-IGNITION; THERMAL EFFICIENCY; VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; BLENDING; COMPRESSION RATIO (MACHINERY); DIRECT INJECTION; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENGINE CYLINDERS; ENGINES; ETHANOL; ETHANOL FUELS;

GASOLINE;

EID: 84870402473     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. C. Park, Y. Choi, C. Kim, S. Oh, G. Lim, and Y. Moriyoshi Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a spark ignition engine using ethanol and ethanol-reformed gas Fuel 89 2010 2118 2125
2. G.H. Tian, R. Daniel, H.Y. Li, H.M. Xu, and S.J. Shuai Laminar burning velocities of 2,5-dimethylfuran compared with ethanol and gasoline Energy Fuels 24 2010 3898 3905
3. Nakata K, Utsumi S, Ota A, Kawatake K. The Effect of ethanol fuel on a spark ignition engine. SAE technical paper 2006-01-3380; 2006.
4. Szybist J, Foster M, Moore W, Confer K. Investigation of knock limited compression ratio of ethanol gasoline blends. SAE technical paper 2010-01-0619; 2010.
5. Caton PA, Hamilton LJ, Cowart JS. An experimental and modeling investigation into the comparative knock and performance characteristics of E85, gasohol [E10] and regular unleaded gasoline [87 (R+M)/2]. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0473; 2007.
6. Ayala F, Gerty M, Heywood JB. SI engine performance. Influences of relative air-fuel ratio, load, compression ratio, and combustion phasing. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0229; 2006.
7. 2 emissions LFEE 2005 2005-001
8. Stein RA, House CJ, Leone TG. Optimal use of E85 in a turbocharged direct injection engine. SAE 2009-01-1490; 2009.
9. L. Bromberg, D.R. Cohen, and J.B. Heywood Calculations of knock suppression in highly turbocharged gasoline/ethanol engines using direct ethanol injection LFEE 2006 2006-001
10. Taniguchi S, Yoshida K, Tsukasaki Y. Feasibility study of ethanol applications to a direct injection gasoline engine. SAE technical paper 2007-01-2037; 2007.
11. D. Turner, H. Xu, R.F. Cracknell, V. Natarajan, and X. Chen Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine Fuel 90 2011 1999 2006
12. X. Wu, R. Daniel, G. Tian, H. Xu, Z. Huang, and D. Richardson Dual-injection: the flexible, bi-fuel concept for spark-ignition engines fuelled with various gasoline and biofuel blends Appl Energy 88 2011 2305 2314
13. G. Zhu, D. Hung, and H. Schock Combustion characteristics of a single-cylinder spark ignition gasoline and ethanol dual-fuelled engine Proc I Mech Eng, Part D: J Aut Eng 224 2010 387 430
14. W.M. Benjamin, J.P. Christopher, A.M. Scott, and D.N. Jeffrey Combustion and emissions characterization of soy methyl ester biodiesel blends in an automotive turbocharged diesel engine J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132 2010 6
15. R. Daniel, G. Tian, H. Xu, M.L. Wyszynski, X. Wu, and Z. Huang Effect of spark timing and load on a DISI engine fuelled with 2,5-dimethylfuran Fuel 90 2011 449 458