Sobol' sensitivity analysis of parameters in the common land model for simulation of water and energy fluxes

Earth Science Informatics

Volumn 5, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 167-179

  Xu, Jianhui ^a   Shu, Hong ^a   Jiang, Hongnan ^b   Dong, Lin ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XINJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bootstrapping; Common land model; Monte Carlo; Sensible heat flux; Sobol' sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; COMMON LAND; ENERGY FLUX; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); SENSIBLE HEAT FLUX; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WATER FLOW;

EID: 84870398283     PISSN: 18650473     EISSN: 18650481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-012-0105-z     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Choi M, Lee SO, Kwon H (2010) Understanding of the common land model performance for water and energy fluxes in a farmland during the growing season in Korea. Hydrol Process 24(8): 1063-1071. doi: 10. 1002/hyp. 7567.
2. Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24(9): 1133-1148. doi: 10. 1002/hyp. 7568.
3. Crucifix M, Betts RA, Cox PM (2005) Vegetation and climate variability: a GCM modelling study. Clim Dyn 24(5): 457-467. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-004-0504-z.
4. Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickinson RE (2001) The common land model: Technical documentation and user's guide.
5. Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickinson RE, Baker I, Bonan GB, Bosilovich MG, Denning AS, Dirmeyer PA, Houser PR, Niu G, Oleson KW, Schlosser CA, Yang Z-L (2003) The common land model. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84(8): 1013-1023. doi: 10. 1175/bams-84-8-1013.
6. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
7. Homma T, Saltelli A (1996) Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52(1): 1-17.
8. Ivanovska S, Atanassov E, Karaivanova A (2005) A superconvergent Monte Carlo method for multiple integrals on the grid. LNCS 3516: 735-742.
9. Karaivanova A, Dimov I, Ivanovska S (2001) A Quasi-Monte Carlo method for integration with improved convergence. LNCS 2179: 158-165.
10. Kucherenko S, Rodriguez-Fernandez M, Pantelides C, Shah N (2009) Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(7): 1135-1148. doi: 10. 1016/j. ress. 2008. 05. 006.
11. Liang X, Dai Y (2008) A sensitivity study of the common land model on soil texture and soil brightness. Clim Environ Res (in Chinese) 13(5): 585-597.
12. Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP, Lohmann D, Boone A, Chang S, Chen F, Dai Y, Desborough C, Dickinsonh RE, Duan Q, Ek M, Gusev YM, Habets F, Irannejad P, Koster R, Mitchell KE, Nasonova ON, Noilhan J, Schaake J, Schlosser A, Shao Y, Shmakin AB, Verseghy D, Warrach K, Wetzel P, Xue Y, Yang Z-L, Zeng Q-C (1998) The project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas river basin experiment: 2. Spatial and temporal analysis of energy fluxes. Glob Planet Chang 19: 137-159.
13. Luo S, Lu S, Zhang Y, Hu Z, Ma Y, Li S, Shang L (2008) Simulation analysis on land surface process of BJ site of Central Tibetan Plateau using CoLM. Plateau Meteorol (in Chinese) 27(2): 259-271.
14. Mölders N (2005) Plant- and soil-parameter-caused uncertainty of predicted surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 133(12): 3498-3516.
15. Moulin S, Bondeau A, Delecolle R (1998) Combining agricultural crop models and satellite observations: from field to regional scales. Int J Remote Sens 19: 1021-1036.
16. Nossent J, Elsen P, Bauwens W (2011) Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environ Model Softw 26(12): 1515-1525. doi: 10. 1016/j. envsoft. 2011. 08. 010.
17. Prihodko L, Denning AS, Hanan NP, Baker I, Davis K (2008) Sensitivity, uncertainty and time dependence of parameters in a complex land surface model. Agric For Meteorol 148(2): 268-287. doi: 10. 1016/j. agrformet. 2007. 08. 006.
18. Rosero E, Yang Z-L, Wagener T, Gulden LE, Yatheendradas S, Niu G-Y (2010) Quantifying parameter sensitivity, interaction, and transferability in hydrologically enhanced versions of the Noah land surface model over transition zones during the warm season. J Geophys Res 115(D3): doi: 10. 1029/2009jd012035.
19. Rosolem R, Gupta HV, Shuttleworth WJ, Zeng X, de Gonçalves LGG (2012) A fully multiple-criteria implementation of the Sobol' method for parameter sensitivity analysis. J Geophys Res 117(D7): doi: 10. 1029/2011jd016355.
20. Saltelli A (2002) Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Comput Phys Commun 145(2): 280-297.
21. Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2002) On the relative importance of input factors in mathematical models: Safety assessment for nuclear waste disposal, vol 97. vol 459. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, ETATS-UNIS.
22. Saltelli A, Annoni P, Azzini I, Campolongo F, Ratto M, Tarantola S (2010) Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181(2): 259-270. doi: 10. 1016/j. cpc. 2009. 09. 018.
23. Sobol' IM (1976) Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property. USSR Comput Maths Math Phys 16: 236-242 (in English).
24. Sobol' IM (1990) On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie: 2(1): 112-118.
25. Sobol' IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simul 55(1-3): 271-280.
26. Sobol' IM (2007) Global sensitivity analysis indices for the investigation of nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 19(11): 23-24, in Russian.
27. Sobol' IM, Tarantola S, Gatelli D, Kucherenko SS, Mauntz W (2007) Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(7): 957-960. doi: 10. 1016/j. ress. 2006. 07. 001.
28. Sridhar V (2002) Validation of the NOAH-OSU land surface model using surface flux measurements in Oklahoma. J Geophys Res 107(D20): doi: 10. 1029/2001jd001306.
29. Tang Y, Reed P, Wagener T, Werkhoven KV (2006) Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3: 3333-3395.
30. Xin Y, Bian L, Zhang X (2006) The application of CoLM to Arid region of Northwest China and Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Plateau Meteorol (in Chinese) 25(4): 567-574.
31. Yang J (2011) Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis. Environ Model Softw 26(4): 444-457. doi: 10. 1016/j. envsoft. 2010. 10. 007.