NHS information: Revolution or evolution?

Health Policy and Technology

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 193-198

  Takian, Amirhossein ^a   Cornford, Tony ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84870391205     PISSN: 22118837     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Liberating the N.H.S.: an information revolution. London: Department of Health ; 2010 [accessed 01.07.12]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_120080.
2. The power of information: putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need. London: Department of Health. 2012. [accessed 31.08.12]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_134181.
3. Making open data real: a public consultation. Cabinet Office ; 2011 [accessed 01.07.12]. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/making-open-data-real-public-consultation.
4. Korner E. Report of the Steering Group on Health Services Information, No.1: a report on the collection and use of information about hospital clinical activity in the NHS. Department of Health and Social Security, Steering Group on Health Services Information; 1982.
5. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005. Department of Health ; 1998 [accessed 30.06.12]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007832.
6. Equity and excellence: liberating the N.H.S. London: Department of Health ; 2010 [accessed 09.03.12]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_117353.
7. The National Program for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems. National Audit Office ; 2011 [accessed 28.06.12]. http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/1012/npfit.aspx.
8. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, et al. The devil's in the detail: final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and Health Space Programmes. London: University College London; 2010.
9. Greenhalgh T., Stramer K., Bratan T., Byrne E., Russell J., Potts H.W.W. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. British Medical Journal 2010, 340:c3111.
10. Major Projects Authority Program Assessment Review Of The National Program For IT. Cabinet Office ; 2011 [accessed 02.07.12]. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/mpa-review-nhs-it.pdf.
11. Takian A., Petrakaki D., Cornford T., Sheikh A., Barber B. Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems. BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12:105.
12. Robertson A., Cresswell K., Takian A., et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. British Medical Journal 2010, 341:c4564.
13. Sheikh A., Cornford T., Barber N., et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in early adopter hospitals'. British Medical Journal 2011, 343:d6054.
14. Cresswell K, Ali M, Avery A, Barber N, Cornford T, Crowe S, et al. The long and winding road...an independent evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the national health service care records service (NHS CRS) in secondary care in England. Available from: ; 2011 [accessed 01.07.12]. http://www.haps.bham.ac.uk/publichealth/cfhep/005.shtml.
15. Warner N. A suitable case for treatment: the NHS reform 2011, Grosvenor House, Surrey.
16. Benson T. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not-part 1: incentives. British Medical Journal 2002, 325(7372):1086-1089.
17. Benson T. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not-part 2: scalability. British Medical Journal 2002, 325(7372):1090-1093.
18. Hillestad R., Bigelow J., Bower A., et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2005, 24(5):1103-1117.
19. Robertson A., Cornford T., Barber N., Avery A., Sheikh A. The NHS IT nightmare: more than just a bad dream. The Lancet 2012, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60023-3.
20. Robertson A., Bates D., Sheikh A. The rise and fall of the National Program for IT. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2011, 00:1-3. 10.1258/jrsm.2011.11k039.
21. Brennan S. The biggest computer program in the world ever! How's it going?. Journal of Information Technology 2007, 22:201-211.
22. Craig D. Plundering the public sector: how new labour are letting consultants run off with £70bn of our money 2006, Counstable, London.
23. Building the information core: implementing the NHS Plan. Department of Health: London; 2001.
24. Kaiser Permanente. 'Lessons learned from the Largest Civilian EHR System' ; 2011 [accessed 04.07.12]. http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/EMR/229200032.
25. Jha A., Perlin J., Kizer H., Dudley A. Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. New England Journal of Medicine 2003, 349:1093-1094.
26. Ovretveit J., Scott T., Rundall T., Shortell S., Brommels M. Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies. Health Policy 2007, 84:181-190.
27. Keshavjee K, Bosomworth J, Copen J, et al. Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings/AMIA symposium; 2006. p. 982.
28. Atherton H., Majeed A. An information revolution: time for the NHS to step up to the challenge. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2011, 104(6):228-230. 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110062.
29. Haughom J. Implementation of an electronic health record. British Medical Journal 2011, 343:d5887. 10.1136/bmj.d5887.
30. Takian A. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English Hospital Joining the National Program for InformationTechnology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2012, 180:901-905.
31. Liberating the NHS: an information revolution. A summary of consultation responses. London: Department of Health ; 2011 [accessed 01.07.12]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_129580.pdf.
32. Blumenthal D., Tavenner M. The meaningful use regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 363:501-504.
33. Government ICT strategy. Cabinet Office. Available from: ; 2011 [accessed 05.07.12]. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/content/government-ict-strategy.
34. Coiera E. Why system inertia makes health reform so difficult. British Medical Journal 2011, 342:d3693.
35. Lichtner V, et al. Mapping stakeholders for system evaluation-the case of the Electronic Prescription Service in England. In: Safran C, Reti S, Marin H, editors. Medinfo 2010-Proceedings of the 13th world congress on medical informatics, Cape Town, South Africa: IOS Press; 2010. p. 1221-25.