Strain-adaptive in silico modeling of bone adaptation - A computer simulation validated by in vivo micro-computed tomography data

Bone

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 485-492

  Schulte, Friederike A ^a   Zwahlen, Alexander ^a   Lambers, Floor M ^a   Kuhn, Gisela ^a   Ruffoni, Davide ^a   Betts, Duncan ^a   Webster, Duncan J ^a   Müller, Ralph ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

In silico simulation; In vivo micro computed tomography; Mechanical loading; Ovariectomy; Trabecular bone; Validation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; BONE STRUCTURE; BONE VOLUME FRACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; LOADING TEST; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; OVARIECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; TRABECULAR BONE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERTEBRA;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; OVARIECTOMY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84870389562     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Frost H.M. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 1990, 226:403-413.
2. Burr D.B. Targeted and nontargeted remodeling. Bone 2002, 30:2-4.
3. Hadjidakis, II, Bone remodeling D.J. Androulakis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1092:385-396.
4. Cohen B., Millett P.J., Mist B., Laskey M.A., Rushton N. Effect of exercise training programme on bone mineral density in novice college rowers. Br J Sports Med 1995, 29:85-88.
5. Leblanc A.D., Schneider V.S., Evans H.J., Engelbretson D.A., Krebs J.M. Bone-mineral loss and recovery after 17weeks of bed rest. J Bone Miner Res 1990, 5:843-850.
6. Riggs B.L. Overview of osteoporosis. West J Med 1991, 154:63-77.
7. Schulte F.A., Lambers F.M., Webster D.J., Kuhn G., Müller R. In vivo validation of a computational bone adaptation model using open-loop control and time-lapsed micro-computed tomography. Bone 2011, 49:1166-1172.
8. Adachi T., Tsubota K., Tomita Y., Hollister S.J. Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using microstructural voxel finite element models. J Biomech Eng 2001, 123:403-409.
9. Ruimerman R., Hilbers P., van Rietbergen B., Huiskes R. A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomech 2005, 38:931-941.
10. Dunlop J.W., Hartmann M.A., Brechet Y.J., Fratzl P., Weinkamer R. New suggestions for the mechanical control of bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 2009, 85:45-54.
11. Frost H.M. The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents. Bone Miner 1987, 2:73-85.
12. Lambers F.M., Schulte F.A., Kuhn G., Webster D.J., Müller R. Mouse tail vertebrae adapt to cyclic mechanical loading by increasing bone formation rate and decreasing bone resorption rate as shown by time-lapsed in vivo imaging of dynamic bone morphometry. Bone 2011, 49:1340-1350.
13. Webster D.J., Morley P.L., van Lenthe G.H., Müller R. A novel in vivo mouse model for mechanically stimulated bone adaptation - a combined experimental and computational validation study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008, 11:435-441.
14. Lambers F.M., Kuhn G., Schulte F.A., Koch K., Müller R. Longitudinal assessment of in vivo bone dynamics in a mouse tail model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 2011, 90:108-119.
15. Frost H.M., Turner C.H. Toward a mathematical description of bone biology: the principle of cellular accommodation. Calcif Tissue Int 2000, 67:184-187.
16. Christen P., van Rietbergen B., Lambers F.M., Müller R., Ito K. Bone morphology allows estimation of loading history in a murine model of bone adaptation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2012, 11(3-4):483-492.
17. Huiskes R., Ruimerman R., van Lenthe G.H., Janssen J.D. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000, 405:704-706.
18. Limpert E., Stahel W.A., Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 2001, 51:341-352.
19. Wergedal J.E., Sheng M.H.C., Ackert-Bicknell C.L., Beamer W.G., Baylink D.J. Genetic variation in femur extrinsic strength in 29 different inbred strains of mice is dependent on variations in femur cross-sectional geometry and bone density. Bone 2005, 36:111-122.
20. Akhter M.P., Iwaniec U.T., Covey M.A., Cullen D.M., Kimmel D.B., Recker R.R. Genetic variations in bone density, histomorphometry, and strength in mice. Calcif Tissue Int 2000, 67:337-344.
21. van Rietbergen B., Weinans H., Huiskes R., Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J Biomech 1995, 28:69-81.
22. Arbenz P., van Lenthe G.H., Mennel U., Müller R., Sala M. A scalable multi-level preconditioner for matrix-free μ-finite element analysis of human bone structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2008, 73:927-947.
23. Mullender M.G., Huiskes R., Versleyen H., Buma P. Osteocyte density and histomorphometric parameters in cancellous bone of the proximal femur in five mammalian species. J Orthop Res 1996, 14:972-979.
24. Courant R., Friedrichs K., Lewy H. Partial differential equations of mathematical physics. Math Ann 1928, 100:32-74.
25. Kohler T., Stauber M., Donahue L.R., Müller R. Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models. Bone 2007, 41:659-667.
26. R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2007, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
27. Schulte F.A., Lambers F.M., Kuhn G., Müller R. In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. Bone 2011, 48:433-442.
28. Turner C.H., Forwood M.R., Rho J.Y., Yoshikawa T. Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 1994, 9:87-97.
29. Hsieh Y.F., Robling A.G., Ambrosius W.T., Burr D.B., Turner C.H. Mechanical loading of diaphyseal bone in vivo: the strain threshold for an osteogenic response varies with location. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16:2291-2297.
30. Cullen D.M., Smith R.T., Akhter M.P. Time course for bone formation with long-term external mechanical loading. J Appl Physiol 2000, 88:1943-1948.
31. Voide R., Schneider P., Stauber M., van Lenthe G.H., Stampanoni M., Müller R. The importance of murine cortical bone microstructure for microcrack initiation and propagation. Bone 2011, 49:1186-1193.
32. Parfitt A.M. Targeted and nontargeted bone remodeling: relationship to basic multicellular unit origination and progression. Bone 2002, 30:5-7.
33. Viceconti M. A tentative taxonomy for predictive models in relation to their falsifiability. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2011, 369:4149-4161.
34. van Rietbergen B., Odgaard A., Kabel J., Huiskes R. Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. J Biomech 1996, 29:1653-1657.