Impact of ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy simulation on trainee confidence and biopsy outcomes

American Journal of Nephrology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 570-574

  Dawoud, Dalia ^a   Lyndon, Will ^a   Mrug, Sylvie ^b   Bissler, John J ^c   Mrug, Michal ^a,d,e  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BIRMINGHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

Bleeding complications; Kidney biopsy; Model; Training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY SIZE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROTHROMBIN TIME; SIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; KIDNEY; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; NEPHROLOGY; SELF EFFICACY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE; TURKEYS;

EID: 84870386646     PISSN: 02508095     EISSN: 14219670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000345305     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Albani JM, Lee DI: Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol En-dourol Soc 2007; 21: 285-287. (Pubitemid 46626535)
2. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Sa-tava RM: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 458-463; discussion 463-454.
3. Uccelli, J, Ka hol, K, Ashby, A, Smith, M, Fer-rara, J: The validity of take-home surgical simulators to enhance resident technical skill proficiency. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 315-319; discussion 319.
4. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1088-1097.
5. Winters W, McDonald R, Krauter L: The detection of murine autosomal recessive poly-cystic kidney disease using real-time ultrasound. Pediatr Nephrol 1997; 11: 337-338. (Pubitemid 27230821)
6. Mackinnon B, Fraser E, Simpson K, Fox JG, Geddes C: Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 3566-3570.
7. Mackinnon B, McKinlay J, McQuarrie E, Geddes C: Ea rly u lt rasound to detec t complications after renal biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 316-317.
8. Waldo, B, Korbet, SM, Freimanis, MG, Lewis, EJ: The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 2433-2439.
9. Mrug M, Bissler JJ: Simulation of real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2010; 78: 705-707.
10. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB: Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011; 86: 706-711.
11. Byrne AJ, Blagrove MT, McDougall SJP: Dynamic confidence during simulated clinical tasks. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 785-788. (Pubitemid 41826603)
12. Coy K, McDougall H, Sneed M: Issues regarding practical validity and gender bias of the Perceptual Abilities Test (PAT). J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 31-37.