Single-port-access cholecystectomy: History should not be allowed to repeat

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1020-1021

  Connor, Saxon ^a  

^a Canterbury Health ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILE DUCT INJURY; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DIATHERMY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NOTE; PEROPERATIVE CARE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

BILE DUCT DISEASES; BILIARY TRACT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CICATRIX; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 67349199159     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-9951-3     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N et al. (2008) Single-port-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9874-4
2. S Varadarajulu A Tamhane E Drelichman 2008 Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy Gastrointest Endosc 67 854 890
3. W Li J Xiao 2008 Investigation for acceptance of natural orifice trasluminal endoscopic surgery by inpatients with digestive disease Gastrointest Endosc 67 Ab120
4. Volckmann ET, Hungness ES, Soper NJ et al. Surgeon perception of NOTES. SSAT 2007 annual meeting abstract book. www.ssat.com/cgi-bin/2007-posters.cgi . Accessed 10 Dec 2008
5. S Connor OJ Garden 2006 Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 93 158 168 (Pubitemid 43259599)
6. KS Gurusamy S Junnarkar M Farouk 2008 Day-case versus overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16 3 CD006798