Characteristics of flux and gel layer on microfilter and non-woven fabric filter surface based on anoxic-aerobic MBRs

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1389-1398

  Lee, Jung Yeol ^a   Choi, Bo Kyung ^a   Ahn, Kyu Hong ^a   Maeng, Sung Kyu ^b   Song, Kyung Guen ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b Sejong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dynamic gel layer; Membrane bioreactor; Membrane fouling; Microfilter; Non woven fabric filter

Indexed keywords

AEROBIC REACTOR; BATCH FILTRATION TESTS; CAKE FORMATION; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMER SUBSTANCE; GEL LAYERS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE SURFACE; MICRO FILTERS; PERMEATE FLUX; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

MEMBRANE FOULING; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NONWOVEN FABRICS; POLYPROPYLENES; SURFACES; THERMOPLASTICS;

MICROFILTRATION;

NITROGEN; ORGANIC MATTER; POLYETHYLENE; POLYPROPYLENE;

AEROBIC REACTOR; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BATCH REACTOR; BIOREACTOR; FILTER; FILTER REACTOR; FILTRATION; GEL; MICROFILTER; NON-WOVEN FABRIC FILTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER;

BIOREACTORS; FILTRATION; GELS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84870334958     PISSN: 16157591     EISSN: 16157605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-012-0727-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kiso Y, Jung YJ, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min KS (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bioreactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34:4143-4150
2. Chang IS, Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd SJ (2001) Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Trans IChemE 79:183-188
3. Chang MC, Horng RY, Shao H, Hu YJ (2006) Performance and filtration characteristics of non-woven membranes used in a submerged membrane bioreactor for synthetic wastewater treatment. Desalination 191:8-15
4. Chang WK, Hu AYJ, Horng RY, Tzou WY (2007) Membrane bioreactor with nonwoven fabrics as solid-liquid separation media for wastewater treatment. Desalination 202:122-128
5. Iversen V, Drews A, Schmidt T (2007) Textile filter medium for the use in membrane vistalization plant. Chem Ing Technol 79:1945-1950
6. Seo GT, Moon BH, Park YM, Kim SH (2007) Filtration characteristics of immersed coarse pore filters in an activated sludge system for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci Technol 55:51-58
7. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep Purif Technol 63:278-286
8. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489-1512
9. Chang IS, Clech PL, Jefferson B, Judd S (2002) Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 128:1018-1029
10. Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 248:17-53
11. Moghaddam MRA, Guan Y, Satoh H, Mino T (2006) Filter clogging in coarse pore filtration activated sludge process under high MLSS concentration. Water Sci Technol 54:55-66
12. Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36:5245-5251
13. Zhou XH, Shi HC, Cai Q, He M, Wu YX (2008) Function of selfforming dynamic membrane and biokinetic parameters determination by microelectrode. Water Res 42:2369-2376
14. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
15. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265-275
16. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350-356
17. Dominguez L, Rodriguez M, Prats D (2010) Effect of different extraction methods on bound EPS from MBR sludge. Part I: influence of extraction methods over three-dimensional EEM fluorescence spectroscopy fingerprint. Desalination 261:19-26
18. Lee J, Ahn WY, Lee CH (2011) Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 35:2435-2445
19. Ognier S, Wisniewski C, Grasmick A (2004) Membrane bioreactor fouling in sub-critical filtration conditions: a local critical flux concept. J Membr Sci 229:171-177
20. Wu YX, Huang X, Wen XH, Chen FT (2005) Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 51:107-114
21. Jeong TY, Cha GC, Yoo IK, Kim DJ (2007) Characteristics of bio-fouling in a submerged MBR. Desalination 207:107-113
22. Barker DJ, Stuckey DC (1999) A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment system. Water Res 33:3063-3082
23. Bouhabila EH, Ben AR, Buisson H (1998) Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment). Desalination 118:315-322
24. Wisniewski C, Grasmick A (1998) Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling. Colloids Surf 138:403-411
25. Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming HC (1999) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances-characterization, structure and function. Springer, Berlin
26. Hocaoglu SM, Orhon D (2010) Fate of soluble residual organics in membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 364:65-74