Understanding music sharing behavior in China: Development of an instrument

14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 1148-1157

  Amoroso, Donald ^a   Dembla, Pamila ^a   Wang, Hui ^b   Greiner, Martina ^b   Liu, Pengpeng ^a  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese consumers; Music piracy; Music sharing; Peer to peer; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

CHINESE CONSUMERS; MUSIC PIRACY; MUSIC SHARING; PEER TO PEER; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INSTRUMENT TESTING; INSTRUMENTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84870333879     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000) Time Flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and Belifes about information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, 24, 4, 665-694.
2. Altinkemer, K. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2000) Bundling and distribution of digitized music over the internet, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10, 3, 209-224.
3. Amoroso, D., Guo, M.(2006), Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
4. Amoroso, D. and Koster.A. (2003) The impact of internet distribution and file sharing on the music industry, European Applied Business Research Conference, Venice, Italy.
5. Ba, S. and Pavlou, P. A. (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior, MIS Quarterly, 26, 3, 243-268.
6. Bhattacherjee, S., Gopal, R. and Sanders. G (2003) Digital music and online sharing: Software piracy 2.0? Communications of the ACM, 46, 7, 107-112.
7. Brancheau, J. C. and Wetherbe, J. C. (1990) The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing, Information Systems Research, 1, 2, 115-143.
8. Chiou, J.-S., Huang, C.Y., and Lee, H.(2005) The antecedents of music piracy attitudes and intentions, Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 2, 161-174.
9. Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319-340.
10. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
11. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, Ontario.
12. Gao, Y. and Koufaris, M. (2006) Perceptual antecedents of user attitude in electronic commerce, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37, 2, 3-42.
13. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., and Vitale, M. (2000) Consumer trust in an Internet store, Information Technology and Management, 1, 45-71.
14. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K. K.(2000) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, 29, 1, 113-143.
15. Koster, A. & Amoroso, D. L. (2003) Evolution of music distribution over the internet. Proceedings of San Diego International Systems Conference.
16. Mathieson, K. (1991) Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 173-191.
17. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 3, 709-734.
18. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting new information technology innovation, Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 192-222.
19. Oberholzer, P. and Strumpf, K. (2004) P2P's impact on recorded music sales, Second Workshop on Economics of Peerto-Peer Systems, Massachusetts.
20. Pavlou, P. A., (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the Technology Acceptance Model., International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3, 101-134.
21. Pavlou, P. A. and Gefen, D. (2004), Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust, Information Systems Research, 15, 1, 37-59.
22. Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., and Vandenbosch, M. (2001) Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system, Information Systems Research, 12, 2, 208-222.
23. Straub, D., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995), Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing, Management Science, 41, 8, 1328-1342.
24. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 144-176.
25. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46, 2, 186-204.
26. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2000) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.
27. Xia, L. and Sudharshan, D. (2000) An examination of the effects of cognitive interruptions on consumer online decision processes, Second Marketing Science Internet Conference, USC, Los Angeles, California.
28. Xu, H., Wang, H., and Teo, H.-H. (2005) Predicting the usage of P2P sharing software: The role of trust and perceived risk, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.