3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy - Results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses

European Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2547-2552

  Braak, Sicco J ^a   Van Melick, Harm H E ^a   Onaca, Mircea G ^a   Van Heesewijk, Johannes P M ^a   Van Strijen, Marco J L ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Hard to reach; Outcome; Percutaneous biopsy; Small renal masses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY HEMORRHAGE; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84870321240     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2498-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Vasudevan A, Davies RJ, Shannon BA, Cohen RJ (2006) Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. BJU Int 97: 946-949
2. Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guillé F, Lobel B (2002) Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 90: 358-363
3. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma - age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). Urology 56: 58-62
4. Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M et al (2009) Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 181: 2033-2036
5. Marinez-Pineiro L, Maestro MA (2010) Challenging the EAU guidelines: role of biopsy and management of small renal tumours. Eur Urol 9: 450-453
6. Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R et al (2007) Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: W357-W364
7. Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JPM (2010) Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W445-W451
8. Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DYT, Uzzo RG (2006) The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 175: 425-431
9. Kroeze SGC, Huisman M, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ, Bosch JLHR, van den Bosch MAAJ (2012) Real-time 3D fluoroscopyguided large core needle biopsy of renal masses: a critical early evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35: 680-685. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0237-4
10. Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR et al (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178: 379-386
11. Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG (2003) Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180: 1281-1287
12. Nadal L, Baumgartner BR, Bernardino ME (1986) Percutaneous renal biopsies: accuracy, safety, and indications. Urol Radiol 8: 67-71
13. Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 53: 1003-1012
14. Silverman SG, Unn Gan Y, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES (2006) Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutanous biopsy. Radiology 240: 6-22
15. Lechevalier E, André M, Barriol D et al (2000) Fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance. Radiology 216: 506-510
16. Lechevalier E (2007) Core biopsy of solid renal masses under CT guidance. Eur Urol 6: 540-543
17. Shannon BA, Cohen RJ, de Bruto H, Davis RJ (2008) The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 180: 1257-1261
18. Sharma KV, Venkatesan AM, Swerdlow D et al (2010) Imageguided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 13: 100-109
19. Hussain S (1996) Gantry angulation in CT-guided percutaneous adrenal biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 537-539
20. vanSonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, Ferruci JT, Mueller PR, Simeone JF (1981) Triangulation method for percutaneous needle guidance: the angled approach to upper abdominal masses. AJRAm J Roentgenol 137: 757-761
21. Odisio BC, Tam AL, Avritscher R, Gupta S, Wallace MJ (2012) CT-guided adrenal biopsy: comparison of ipsilateral decubitus versus prone patient positioning for biopsy approach. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2363-4
22. Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Baba HA et al (2008) MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system. Eur Radiol 18: 2865-2873
23. Kühn JP, Langner S, Hegenscheid K et al (2010) Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field widebore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artifacts. Eur Radiol 20: 2414-2421
24. Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I et al (2009) Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional Imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology 250: 545-550
25. Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J (2007) CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188: 1479-1484
26. Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, van Meerten EL Van Persijn (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74: 720-726
27. Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J (2009) Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192: 881-886
28. Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of corecutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58: 390-395
29. Kolb LG, Velosa JA, Bergstralh EJ, Offord KP (1994) Percutaneous renal allograft biopsy a comparison of two neelde types and analysis of risk factors. Transplantation 57: 1742-1746
30. Whittier WL, Korbet SM (2004) Renal biopsy: update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 661-665