Carbon nanotubes impregnated with subventricular zone neural progenitor cells promotes recovery from stroke

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages 2751-2765

  Moon, Sung Ung ^a   Kim, Jihee ^a   Bokara, Kiran Kumar ^a   Kim, Jong Youl ^a   Khang, Dongwoo ^b,c   Webster, Thomas J ^b,c   Lee, Jong Eun ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Brown University   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Brain; Carbon nanotubes; In vivo; Stem cell; Stroke; Wettability

Indexed keywords

BROXURIDINE; CARBON NANOTUBE; CD11B ANTIGEN; CELL MARKER; DOUBLECORTIN; GLIAL FIBRILLARY ACIDIC PROTEIN; GLYCOPROTEIN P 15095; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 2; NESTIN; SYNAPTOPHYSIN;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBODY LABELING; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; BRAIN INFARCTION SIZE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE CELL LESION; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; SUBVENTRICULAR ZONE; SYNAPTIC INHIBITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOVEMENT; EXERCISE TEST; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NANOTUBES, CARBON; NEURAL STEM CELLS; NEUROGENESIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STROKE; SYNAPSES; WETTABILITY;

RATTUS;

EID: 84870314846     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S30273     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Chai C, Leong KW. Biomaterials approach to expand and direct differentiation of stem cells. Mol Ther. 2007;15(3):467-480.
2. Ma W, Fitzgerald W, Liu QY, etal. CNS stem and progenitor cell differentiation into functional neuronal circuits in three-dimensional collagen gels. Exp Neurol. 2004;190(2):276-288.
3. Ruoslahti E. Stretching is good for a cell. Science. 1997;276(5317): 1345-1346.
4. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005;310(5751):1139-1143.
5. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natiella RR, Carter JM. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18(4):327-355.
6. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126(4):677-689.
7. Weiss P. Experiments on cell and axon orientation in vitro; the role of colloidal exudates in tissue organization. J Exp Zool. 1945;100: 353-386.
8. Curtis AS, Varde M. Control of cell behavior: topological factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1964;33:15-26.
9. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials. 1997;18(24):1573-1583.
10. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. New depths in cell behaviour: reactions of cells to nanotopography. Biochem Soc Symp. 1999;65:15-26.
11. Recknor JB, Sakaguchi DS, Mallapragada SK. Directed growth and selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells on micropatterned polymer substrates. Biomaterials. 2006;27(22):4098-4108.
12. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15):2603-2610.
13. Oliva AA Jr, James CD, Kingman CE, Craighead HG, Banker GA. Patterning axonal guidance molecules using a novel strategy for microcontact printing. Neurochem Res. 2003;28(11):1639-1648.
14. Estes BT, Gimble JM, Guilak F. Mechanical signals as regulators of stem cell fate. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2004;60:91-126.
15. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 2004;6(4):483-495.
16. Weiss L. The adhesion of cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1960;9:187-225.
17. Kaelble DH, Moacanin J. Surface energetics analysis of artificial blood substitutes. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979;17(5):593-601.
18. Grinnell F. Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. Int Rev Cytol. 1978;53:65-144.
19. Absolom DR, Hawthorn LA, Chang G. Endothelialization of polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(4):271-285.
20. Schleicher I, Parker A, Leavesley D, Crawford R, Upton Z, Xiao Y. Surface modification by complexes of vitronectin and growth factors for serum-free culture of human osteoblasts. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(11-12):1688-1698.
21. Hamilton DW, Riehle MO, Monaghan W, Curtis AS. Chondrocyte aggregation on micrometric surface topography: a time-lapse study. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(1):189-199.
22. Kim TG, Park TG. Biomimicking extracellular matrix: cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(2):221-233.
23. van Wachem PB, Beugeling T, Feijen J, Bantjes A, Detmers JP, van Aken WG. Interaction of cultured human endothelial cells with polymeric surfaces of different wettabilities. Biomaterials. 1985;6(6): 403-408.
24. van Wachem PB, Hogt AH, Beugeling T, etal. Adhesion of cultured human endothelial cells onto methacrylate polymers with varying surface wettability and charge. Biomaterials. 1987;8(5):323-328.
25. Kishida A, Iwata H, Tamada Y, Ikada Y. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces grafted with non-ionic and ionic monomers. Biomaterials. 1991;12(8):786-792.
26. Lee JH, Khang G, Lee JW, Lee HB. Interaction of different types of cells on polymer surfaces with wettability gradient. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;205(2):323-330.
27. Lee JH, Lee JW, Khang G, Lee HB. Interaction of cells on chargeable functional group gradient surfaces. Biomaterials. 1997;18(4): 351-358.
28. Kim MS, Shin YN, Cho MH, etal. Adhesion behavior of human bone marrow stromal cells on differentially wettable polymer surfaces. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(8):2095-2103.
29. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(1-2):1-18.
30. Lin JC, Tseng SM. Surface characterization and platelet adhesion studies on polyethylene surface with hirudin immobilization. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12(9):827-832.
31. Akerud P, Canals JM, Snyder EY, Arenas E. Neuroprotection through delivery of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor by neural stem cells in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21(20):8108-8118.
32. Teng YD, Lavik EB, Qu X, etal. Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(5): 3024-3029.
33. Park KI, Teng YD, Snyder EY. The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(11):1111-1117.
34. Borlongan CV, Tajima Y, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, Sanberg PR. Cerebral ischemia and CNS transplantation: differential effects of grafted fetal rat striatal cells and human neurons derived from a clonal cell line. Neuroreport. 1998;9(16):3703-3709.
35. Ourednik V, Ourednik J, Flax JD, etal. Segregation of human neural stem cells in the developing primate forebrain. Science. 2001;293(5536):1820-1824.
36. Steindler DA. Neural stem cells, scaffolds, and chaperones. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(11):1091-1093.
37. Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(5):2074-2077.
38. Snyder EY, Taylor RM, Wolfe JH. Neural progenitor cell engraftment corrects lysosomal storage throughout the MPS VII mouse brain. Nature. 1995;374(6520):367-370.
39. Martinez-Serrano A, Bjorklund A. Protection of the neostriatum against excitotoxic damage by neurotrophin-producing, genetically modified neural stem cells. J Neurosci. 1996;16(15):4604-4616.
40. Snyder EY, Yoon C, Flax JD, Macklis JD. Multipotent neural precursors can differentiate toward replacement of neurons undergoing targeted apoptotic degeneration in adult mouse neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(21):11663-11668.
41. Gage FH. Cell therapy. Nature. 1998;392(Suppl 6679):18-24.
42. Bellamkonda R, Ranieri JP, Bouche N, Aebischer P. Hydrogel-based three-dimensional matrix for neural cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(5):663-671.
43. Woerly S, Petrov P, Sykova E, Roitbak T, Simonova Z, Harvey AR. Neural tissue formation within porous hydrogels implanted in brain and spinal cord lesions: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and diffusion studies. Tissue Eng. 1999;5(5):467-488.
44. Lovat V, Pantarotto D, Lagostena L, etal. Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. Nano Lett. 2005;5(6):1107-1110.
45. Johansson F, Carlberg P, Danielsen N, Montelius L, Kanje M. Axonal outgrowth on nano-imprinted patterns. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8): 1251-1258.
46. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials. 2002;23(15): 3279-3287.
47. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2003;24(11):1877-1887.
48. McKenzie JL, Waid MC, Shi R, Webster TJ. Decreased functions of astrocytes on carbon nanofiber materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25(7-8): 1309-1317.
49. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70(1):129-138.
50. Nho Y, Kim JY, Khang D, Webster TJ, Lee JE. Adsorption of mesenchymal stem cells and cortical neural stem cells on carbon nanotube/polycarbonate urethane. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010;5(3): 409-417.
51. Kim JY, Khang D, Lee JE, Webster TJ. Decreased macrophage density on carbon nanotube patterns on polycarbonate urethane. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88(2):419-426.
52. Lee JE, Khang D, Webster TJ. Stem cell impregnated carbon nanotubes nanofibers for healing damaged neural tissue. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2006;915:R01-R07.
53. Grinnell F, Feld MK. Fibronectin adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces detected by antibody binding and analyzed during cell adhesion in serum-containing medium. J Biol Chem. 1982;257(9): 4888-4893.
54. Horbett TA, Schway MB. Correlations between mouse 3T3 cell spreading and serum fibronectin adsorption on glass and hydroxyethylmethacrylate-ethylmethacrylate copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(9):763-793.
55. Steele JG, Johnson G, Underwood PA. Role of serum vitronectin and fibronectin in adhesion of fibroblasts following seeding onto tissue culture polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26(7):861-884.
56. Lee JE, Yenari MA, Sun GH, etal. Differential neuroprotection from human heat shock protein 70 overexpression in in vitro and in vivo models of ischemia and ischemia-like conditions. Exp Neurol. 2001;170(1):129-139.
57. Yenari MA, Palmer JT, Sun GH, de Crespigny A, Mosely ME, Steinberg GK. Time-course and treatment response with SNX-111, an N-type calcium channel blocker, in a rodent model of focal cerebral ischemia using diffusion-weighted MRI. Brain Res. 1996;739(1-2):36-45.
58. Windle V, Corbett D. Fluoxetine and recovery of motor function after focal ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2005;1044(1):25-32.
59. Kim JH, Yenari MA, Giffard RG, Cho SW, Park KA, Lee JE. Agmatine reduces infarct area in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia and protects cultured neurons from ischemia-like injury. Exp Neurol. 2004;189(1):122-130.
60. Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Lu M, Zhang X, Chopp M. Therapeutic benefit of intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2001;189(1-2):49-57.
61. Napieralski JA, Banks RJ, Chesselet MF. Motor and somatosensory deficits following uni-and bilateral lesions of the cortex induced by aspiration or thermocoagulation in the adult rat. Exp Neurol. 1998;154(1):80-88.
62. Limke TL, Rao MS. Neural stem cells in aging and disease. J Cell Mol Med. 2002;6(4):475-496.
63. Srivastava AS, Shenouda S, Mishra R, Carrier E. Transplanted embryonic stem cells successfully survive, proliferate, and migrate to damaged regions of the mouse brain. Stem Cells. 2006;24(7):1689-1694.
64. Harrison BS, Atala A. Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):344-353.
65. Ratner BD. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
66. Chang YC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Li H. Regenerative therapy for stroke. Cell Transplant. 2007;16(2):171-181.
67. Vermeer AW, Giacomelli CE, Norde W. Adsorption of IgG onto hydrophobic teflon. Differences between the F(ab) and F(c) domains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1526(1):61-69.
68. Chen RJ, Bangsaruntip S, Drouvalakis KA, etal. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(9):4984-4989.
69. Arvidsson A, Collin T, Kirik D, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med. 2002;8(9):963-970.