Connectivity, genetic structure and stress response of Phragmites australis: Issues for restoration in a salinising wetland system

Aquatic Botany

Volumn 104, Issue , 2013, Pages 138-146

  Hurry, Charlotte R ^a   James, Elizabeth A ^b   Thompson, Ross M ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS VICTORIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chloroplast haplotype; Microsatellite; Plant condition; Restoration technique; Spatial genetic structure; Wetland salinity

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; COASTAL WETLAND; CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GRASS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MORPHOLOGY; SALINITY TOLERANCE;

AUSTRALIA; GIPPSLAND LAKES; VICTORIA [AUSTRALIA];

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 84870291626     PISSN: 03043770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adams J.G., Bate G.C. Growth and photosynthetic performance of Phragmites australis in estuarine waters: a field and experimental evaluation. Aquatic Botany 1999, 64:359-367.
2. Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Poff N.L., Naiman R.J. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 2006, 16:1311-1318.
3. Ashley M.V. Plant parentage, pollination, and dispersal: how DNA microsatellites have altered the landscape. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2010, 29:148-161.
4. Bird E.C.F. Reed growth in the Gippsland Lakes. Victorian Naturalist 1961, 77:262-268.
5. Bird E.C.F. The utilisation of some Australian coastal lakes. Australian Geographer 1962, 8:199-206.
6. Bird E.C.F. The Geomorphology of the Gippsland Lakes Region. Publication No.186 Environmental Study Series 1978, Ministry for Conservation, Victoria.
7. 2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 1987, 170:489-504.
8. Bonin C., Bellemain E., Bronken Eidesen P., Pompanon F., Brochmann C., Taberlet P. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:3261-3273. 10.1111/j1365-294x2004.02346.x.
9. Bonnet E., Van de Peer Y. zt: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Software 2002, 7:1-12.
10. Brix H. The European research project on reed die-back and progression (EUREED). Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 1999, 29:5-10.
11. Butcher P.A., McDonald M.W., Bell J.C. Congruence between environmental parameters, morphology and genetic structure in Australia's most widely distributed eucalypt, Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2009, 5:189-210.
12. Castañeda C., Ducrot D. Land cover mapping of wetland areas in an agricultural landscape using SAR and Landsat imagery. Journal of Environment Management 2009, 90:2270-2277. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.030.
13. Chambers R.M., Meyerson L.A., Saltonstall K. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany 1999, 64:261-273.
14. Chu H., Cho W.K., Jo Y., Kim W.-I., Rim Y., Kim J.-Y. Identification of natural hybrids in Korean Phragmites using haplotype and genotype analyses. Plant Systematics and Evolution 2011, 293:247-253.
15. Clark L.V., Jasieniuk M. POLYSAT: an R package for polyploid microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 2011, 11:562-566.
16. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:1657-1659.
17. Clevering O.A., Lissner J. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 1999, 64:185-208.
18. Clucas R.D., Ladiges P.Y. Dieback of Phragmites australis (Common reed) and increased salinity in the Gippsland Lakes. Publication No. 292 1980, Ministry for Conservation, Victoria.
19. Dept. of Natural Resources and Environment, 2001. Lake Wellington Catchment Salinity Management Plan Wetlands Monitoring Project. Part of A: Analysis and interpretation of wetland monitoring data, Victoria.
20. Erwin K.L. Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecological Management 2009, 17:71-84. 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1.
21. Fér T., Hroudová Z. Genetic diversity and dispersal of Phragmites australis a small river system. Aquatic Botany 2009, 90:165-171.
22. Gosling A. Coastal 20-$2.5 million for the restoration of 20 iconic coastal wetlands in northern New South Wales and South East Queensland. Australasian Plant Conservation: Journal of the Australian Network for Plant Conservation 2011, 20:3-4. Availability: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=667316528065061;res=IELHSS, ISSN:1039-6500 (cited 24.07.12).
23. Guo W., Wang R., Zhou S., Zhang S., Zhang Z. Genetic diversity and clonal structure of Phragmites australis in the Yellow River delta of China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 2003, 31:1093-1109.
24. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 1999, 41:95-98.
25. Hardy O.J., Vekemans X. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2002, 2:618-620.
26. Havens K., Berquist H., Priest W. Common reed grass Phragmites australis, expansion into constructed wetlands: are we mortgaging our wetland future?. Estuaries 2003, 26:417-422.
27. Hellings S., Gallagher J. Effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis. Journal of Applied Ecology 1992, 29:41-49.
28. Hoffmann A.A., Willi Y. Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nature Reviews 2008, 9:421-431.
29. Howard R.J., Rafferty P.S. Clonal variation in response to salinity and flooding stress in four marsh macrophytes of the northern Gulf of Mexico, USA. Environmental and Experimental Botany 2006, 56:301-313.
30. Howard R.J., Travis S.E., Sikes B.A. Rapid growth of a Eurasian haplotype of Phragmites australis in a restored brackish marsh in Louisiana, USA. Biological Invasions 2008, 10:369-379.
31. Jodoin Y., Lavoie C., Villeneuve P., Theriault M., Beaulieu J., Belzile F. High ways as corridors and habitats for the invasive common reed Phrgamites australis in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Applied Ecology 2008, 45:459-466.
32. Jombart T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1403-1405.
33. Jombart T., Devillard S., Balloux F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics 2010, 11:1-15.
34. Jombart T., Ahmed I. adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 2011, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521.
35. Kirk H., Paul J., Straka J., Freeland J.R. Long-distance dispersal and high genetic diversity are implicated in the invasive spread of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae), in North America. American Journal of Botany 2011, 98:1180-1190.
36. Krause G.H., Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 1991, 42:313-349.
37. Lissner J., Schierup H.H. Effects of salinity on the growth of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 1997, 55:247-260.
38. Loveless M.D., Hamrick J.L. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1984, 15:65-95.
39. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 1967, 27:209-220.
40. Marks M., Lapin B., Randall J. Phragmites australis (P-communis)-threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 1994, 14:285-294.
41. Matthews J.W., Peralta A.L., Flanagan D.N., Baldwin P.M., Soni A., Kent A.D., Endress A.G. Relative influence of landscape vs. local factors on plant. community assembly in restored wetlands. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:2108-2123.
42. McCormick M., Kettenring K.M., Baron H.M., Whigham D.F. Extent and reproductive mechanisms of Phragmites australis spread in brackish wetlands in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland (USA). Wetlands 2010, 30:67-74.
43. McCormick M., Kettenring K.M., Baron H.M., Whigham D.F. Spread of invasive Phragmites australis in estuaries with differing degrees of development: genetic patterns, Allee effects and interpretation. Journal of Ecology 2010, 6:1369-1378.
44. Meadows R.E., Saltonstall K. Distribution of native and introduced Phragmites australis in freshwater and oligohaline tidal marshes of the Delmarva peninsula and southern New Jersey. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 2007, 134:99-107.
45. Merritt D.M., Scott M.L., Poff N.L., Auble G.T., Lytle D.A. Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: riparian vegetation-flow response guilds. Freshwater Biology 2010, 55:206-225.
46. Morris K., Raulings E., Melbourne T., Mac Nally R., Thompson R.M. A novel trap for quantifying the dispersal of seeds by wind. Journal of Vegetation Science 2011, 22:807-817.
47. Munns R., Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2008, 59:651-681.
48. Otto S.P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 2007, 131:452-462.
49. Paul J., Vachon N., Garroway C.J., Freeland J.R. Molecular data provide strong evidence of natural hybridization between native and introduced lineages of Phragmites australis in North America. Biological Invasions 2010, 12:2967-2973.
50. Paul J., Kirk H., Freeland J. Genetic diversity and differentiation of fragmented reedbeds (Phragmites australis) in the United Kingdom. Hydrobiologia 2011, 665:107-115.
51. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 2006, 6:288-295.
52. Plut K., Paul J., Ciotir C., Major M., Freeland J.R. Origin of non-native Phragmites australis in North America, a common wetland invader. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 2011, 179:121-129.
53. R Development Core Team R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
54. Ralph P.J., Gademann R. Rapid light curves: a powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity. Aquatic Botany 2005, 82:222-237.
55. Raulings E.J., Boon P.I., Bailey P.C.E., Roache M.C., Morris K., Robinson R. Rehabilitation of Swamp Paperbark (Melaleuca ericifolia) wetlands in south-eastern Australia: effects of hydrology, microtopography, plant age and planting technique on the success of community-based revegetation trials. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2007, 15:175-188.
56. Richter B.D., Mathews R., Wigington R. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:206-224.
57. Salter J., Morris K., Bailey P.C.E., Boon P.I. Interactive effects of salinity and water depth on the growth of Melaleuca ericifolia Sm (Swamp paperbark) seedlings. Aquatic Botany 2007, 86:213-222.
58. Saltonstall K. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed Phragmites australis into north America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99:2445-2449.
59. Saltonstall K. Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis: implications for management. Estuaries 2003, 26:444-451.
60. Saltonstall K. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Molecular Ecology 2003, 12:1689-1702.
61. Sato T., Isagi Y., Sakio H., Osumi K., Goto S. Effect of gene flow on spatial genetic structure in the riparian canopy tree Cercidiphyllum japonicum revealed by microsatellite analysis. Heredity 2006, 96:79-84.
62. Silliman B.R., Bertness M.D. Shoreline development drives invasion of Phragmites australis and the loss of plant diversity on New England salt marshes. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:1424-1434.
63. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of nature populations. Science 1987, 236:787-792.
64. + transporter PhaHAK2, from salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant reed plants. Biotechnology Letters 2007, 29:501-506.
65. + transporter gene PhaHKT1 of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive reed plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 2007, 58:4387-4395.
66. Tharme R.E. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 2003, 19:397-441.
67. Vasquez E.A., Glenn E.P., Brown J.J., Guntespergen G.R., Nelson S.G. Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 2005, 298:1-8.
68. Weeks A.R., Sgrò C.M., Young A.G., Frankham R., Mitchell N.J., Miller K.A., Byrne M., Coates D.J., Eldridge M.D.B., Sunnucks P., Breed M.F., James E.A., Hoffman A.A. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Ecological Applications 2011, 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x.
69. Wijte H.B.M., Gallagher J.L. Effect of oxygen availability and salinity on early life history stages of salt marsh plants. I. Different germination strategies of Spartina alternifolia and Phragmites australis (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 1996, 83:1337-1347.