Effects of salinity on the growth of Phragmites australis

Aquatic Botany

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 247-260

  Lissner, Jørgen ^a   Schierup, Hans Henrik ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Osmoregulation; Relative growth rates; Salinity tolerance; Salt excretion; Survival

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOTANY; GROWTH RATE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; OSMOLALITY; OSMOREGULATION; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; SURVIVAL;

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; POACEAE;

GROWTH; OSMOREGULATION; SALINITY TOLERANCE; SALT EXCRETION; SURVIVAL;

DENMARK, JUTLAND;

EID: 0030617986     PISSN: 03043770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3770(96)01085-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bird, E.C.F., 1961. Reed growth in the Gibbsland Lakes. Vict. Nat., 77: 262-268.
2. Björk, S., 1967. Ecologic investigations of Phragmites communis. Studies in theoretic and applied limnology. Folia Limnol. Scand., 14: 1-248.
3. Borhidi, A., 1970. Ökologie, Wettbewerp und Zönologie des Schilfrohrs (Phragmites communis L.) und die Systematik der Brackrörhricte. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung., 16 (1-2): 1-12.
4. Chapman, V.J., 1939. Studies in salt-marsh ecology. Sections IV and V. J. Ecol., 27: 160-201.
5. Clucas, R.D. and Ladiges, P.Y., 1980. Die-back of Phragmites australis (Common Reed) and increased salinity in the Gibbsland Lakes. Environmental Studies Series, 292 Ministry for Conservation, Victoria.
6. FAO/UNESCO, 1973. Irrigation, Drainage and Salinity. An International Source Book. Hutchinson, London.
7. Hastam, S.M., 1969. Variation of population type in Phragmites communis Trin. Ann. Bot., 34: 147-158.
8. Haslam, S.M., 1970. The performance of Phragmites communis Trin, in relation to water-supply. Ann. Bot., 34: 867-77.
9. Haslam, S.M., 1971. The development and establishment of young plants of Phragmites communis Trin. Ann. Bot., 35: 1059-1072.
10. Haslam, S.M., 1972. Biological flora of the British Isles. Phragmites communis Trin. J. Ecol., 60: 585-610.
11. Haslam, S.M., 1973. Some aspects of the life history and autecology of Phragmites communis Trin. A review. Polsk. Arch. Hydrobiol., 20: 79-100.
12. Hellings, S.E. and Gallagher, J.L., 1992. The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis. J. Appl. Ecol., 29: 41-49.
13. Matoh, T., Matsushita, N. and Takahashi, E., 1988. Salt tolerance of the reed plant Phragmites communis. Physiol. Plant., 72: 8-14.
14. Milburn, J.A., 1979. Water Flow in Plants. Integrated Themes in Biology. Longman, London.
15. Ranwell, D.S., Bird, E.C.F. and Hubbard, J.C.E., 1964. Spartina salt marshes in southern England. V. Tidal submergence and chlorinity in Poole Harbour. J. Ecol., 52: 627-642.
16. Robbins, C.W., Meyer, W.S., Prathapar, S.A. and White, R.J.G., 1991. Understanding salt and sodium in soils, irrigation water and shallow groundwaters. CSIRO Water Resources Series, 4. Canberra.
17. Roman, C.T., Niering, W.A. and Warren, R.S., 1984. Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction. Environ. Manage., 8: 141-150.
18. Schiemp, H.-H., 1987. Marginaljorder og miljøinteresser: Tagrørsarealers økologi, drift og udnyttelse. Miljøministeriets projektundersøgelser, 1987, Teknikerrapport nr. 33 (Denmark).
19. Taylor, N., 1939. Salt tolerance of Long Island salt marsh plants. New York State Mus. Circ., 23: 1-42.
20. Waisel, Y. and Rechav, Y., 1971. Ecotypic differentiation in Phragmites communis Trin. Hidrobiol., 12, 259-266.