Modeling unsteady flow characteristics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1431-1450

  Shahriari, S ^a   Hassan, I G ^a   Kadem, L ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Pressure symmetric formulation; Smoothed particle hydrodynamics; Transient and oscillating flows; Viscosity formulations; Wall shear stress; XSPH variant

Indexed keywords

BODY FORCES; CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS; DIFFERENT FREQUENCY; DRIVING FORCES; EXACT SOLUTION; FLOW CHARACTERISTIC; FLOW PHENOMENA; FREE-SURFACE FLOW; HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBER; INTERNAL FLOWS; LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER; MOVING BOUNDARIES; OSCILLATING PRESSURE; PHASE LAGS; POISEUILLE FLOW; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS METHODS; STOKES' SECOND PROBLEM; TRANSIENT FLOW; WALL SHEAR STRESS; WOMERSLEY; XSPH VARIANT;

BENCHMARKING; OSCILLATING FLOW; REYNOLDS NUMBER;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 84870242868     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Liu G.R., Liu M.B. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method 2003, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
2. Stillinger F.H., Rahman A. Improved simulation of liquid water by molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60:1545-1557.
3. Rubinstein R.Y., Kroese D.P. Simulation and the Mont Carlo Method 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. second ed.
4. Chen S., Doolen G.D. Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1998, 30:329-364.
5. Harlow F.H. The particle-in-cell computing method for fluid dynamics. Methods Comput. Phys. 1964, 3:319-343.
6. Lucy L.B. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron. J. 1977, 82:1013-1020.
7. Gingold R.A., Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1977, 181:375-389.
8. Monaghan J.J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 110:399-406.
9. Takeda H., Miyama S.M., Sekiya M. Numerical simulation of viscous flow by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1994, 92:939-960.
10. Morris J.P., Fox P.J., Zhu Y. Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 136:214-226.
11. Monaghan J.J., Kocharyan A. SPH simulation of multi-phase flow. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 87:225-235.
12. Hu X.Y., Adams N.A. A multi-phase SPH method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows. J. Comput. Phys 2006, 213:844-861.
13. Colagrossi A., Landrini M. Numerical simulation of interfacial flume by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 191:448-475.
14. Zhu Y., Fox P.J., Morris J.P. A pore-scale numerical model for flow through porous media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 1999, 23:881-904.
15. Ellero M., Kroger M., Hess S. Viscoelastic flows studied by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2002, 105:35-51.
16. International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research, J. Hydraulic Res., vol. 48, Supp. 1, Taylor & Francis, 2010. (URL: ). http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tjhr20/48/sup1.
17. Sigalotti L.D.G., Klapp J., Sira E., Melean Y., Hasmy A. SPH simulations of time-dependent Poiseuille flow at low Reynolds numbers. J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 191:622-638.
18. Lee E.S., Moulinec C., Xu R., Violeau D., Laurence D., Stansby P. Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:8417-8436.
19. Ting T.S., Prakash M., Cleary P.W., Thompson M.C. Simulation of high Reynolds number flow over a backward facing step using SPH. ANZIAM J. 2005, 47:C292-C309.
20. Libersky L., Petschek A.G. Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials. Advances in the Free Lagrange Method. Lect. Notes Phys. 1991, 395:248-257.
21. Benz W., Asphaug E. Simulations of brittle solids using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 87:253-265.
22. Randles P.W., Libersky L. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics some recent improvements and applications. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1996, 139:375-408.
23. Bonet J., Kulasegaram S. Correction and stabilization of smooth particle hydrodynamics methods with applications in metal forming simulations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2000, 47:1189-1214.
24. Gray J.P., Monaghan J.J., Swift R.P. SPH elastic dynamics. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2001, 190:6641-6662.
25. Cummins S.J., Rudman M. An SPH projection method. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 152:584-607.
26. Jiang F., Oliveira M.S.A., Sousa A.C.M. SPH simulation of transition to turbulence for planar shear fl. subjected to a streamwise magnetic field. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 217:485-501.
27. Traub O., Berk B.C. Laminar shear stress: mechanisms by which endothelial cells transduce an atheroprotective force. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1998, 18:677-685.
28. Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophy. 1992, 30:543-574.
29. Fox R.W., McDonald A.T., Pritchard P.J. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics 2004, John Wiley & Sons. Inc. sixth ed.
30. Ma J., Ge W. Is standard symmetric formulation always better for smoothed particle hydrodynamics?. Comput. Math. Appl. 2008, 55:1503-1513.
31. Cleary P.W. Modelling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH. Appl. Math. Model. 1998, 22:981-993.
32. Liu M.B., Liu G.R., Lam K.Y. Constructing smoothing functions in smoothed particle hydrodynamics with applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2003, 155:263-284.
33. Violeau D., Issa R. Numerical modeling of complex turbulent free-surface flows with the SPH method: an overview. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2007, 53:277-304.
34. Koshizuka S., Nobe A., Oka Y. Numerical analysis of breaking waves using the moving particle semi-implicit method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 1998, 26:751-769.
35. Quinlan N.J., Basa M., Lastiwka M. Truncation error in mesh-free particle methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2006, 66:2064-2085.
36. Vaughan G.L., Healy T.R., Bryan K.R., Sneyd A.D., Gorman R.M. Completeness, conservation and error in SPH for fluids. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2008, 56:37-62.
37. Graham D.I., Hughes J.P. Accuracy of SPH viscous flow models. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2008, 56:1261-1269.
38. Basa M., Quinlan N.J., Lastiwka M. Robustness and accuracy of SPH formulations for viscous flow. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2008, 60:1127-1148.
39. Fatehi R., Manzari M.T. Error estimation in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and a new scheme for second derivatives. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61:482-498.
40. Maddison S.T., Murray J.R., Monaghan J.J. SPH simulations of accretion disks and narrow rings. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 1996, 13:66-70.
41. Monaghan J.J., Gingold R.A. Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. J. Comput. Phys. 1983, 52:374-389.
42. Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations of shear flow. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2006, 365:199-213.
43. Monaghan J.J. On the problem of penetration in particle methods. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 82(1):1-15.
44. Imaeda Y., Inutsuka S.-I. Shear flows in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 2002, 569:501-518.
45. Loudon C., Tordesillas A. The use of dimensionless Womersley number to characterize the unsteady nature of internal flow. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 191:63-78.
46. White F.M. Viscous Fluid Flow 1991, McGraw-Hill book Co. second ed.
47. Omidvar P., Stansby P.K., Rogers B.D. Wave body interaction in 2D using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with variable particle mass. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2012, 68:686-705.
48. Irace C., Cortese C., Fiaschi E., Carallo C., Farinaro E., Gnasso A. Wall shear stress is associated with intima-media thickness and carotid atherosclerosis in subjects at low coronary heart disease risk. Stroke 2004, 35:464-468.
49. Yamaguchi R., Mashima T., Amagai H., Fujii H., Hayase T., Tanishita K. Variation of wall shear stress and periodic oscillations induced in the right-angle branch during laminar steady flow. J. Fluids Eng. 2005, 127(5):1013-1020.
50. Gésan-Guiziou G., Daufin G., Boyaval E., Berre O. Wall shear stress: effective parameter for the characterisation of the cross-flow transport in turbulent regime during skimmed milk microfiltration. Lait 1999, 79(3):347-354.
51. Bonet J., Lok T.-S.L. Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1999, 180:97-115.