The kinematics and stability of single-radius versus multi-radius femoral components related to Mid-range instability after TKA

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 53-58

  Stoddard, James E ^a   Deehan, David J ^b   Bull, Anthony M J ^a   McCaskie, Andrew W ^c   Amis, Andrew A ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

kinematics; ligament laxity; mid range instability; prosthesis geometry; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INSTABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CADAVER; COXA VALGA; COXA VARA; FEMUR; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIBIA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84870242556     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22170     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR., 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82-B: 1189-1195.
2. Clarke H, Hentz JG., 2008. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2711-2716.
3. Scuderi GR, Meneghini RM, Booth RE, et al. 2009. Technological developments in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91-A: 49-51.
4. National Joint Registry for England and Wales Version 6 2009. www.njrcentre.org.uk 23-25.
5. Attfield S, Wilton T, Pratt D, et al. 1996. Soft tissue balance and recovery of proprioception after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B: 540-545.
6. Firestone TP, Eberle RW., 2006. Surgical management of symptomatic instability following failed primary knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88-A: 80-84.
7. Yercan HS, Selmi AS, Sugun TS, et al. 2005. Tibiofemoral instability in total knee replacement: a review, Part 1: Basic principles and classification. Knee 12: 257-266.
8. Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, et al. 2010. The effect of anteroposterior laxity on the range of movement and knee function following a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92-B: 1090-1095.
9. Warren PJ, Olanlokum TK, Cobb AG, et al. 1994. Laxity and function in knee replacements: a comparative study of three prosthetic designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305: 200-208.
10. Warren LF, Marshall JL, Girgis F., 1974. The prime static stabilizer of the medial side of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56A: 665-674.
11. Wang H, Simpson K, Ferrara M, et al. 2006. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit to stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. J Arthrop 21: 1193-1199.
12. Kessler O, Bull AMJ, Amis AA., 2009. A method to quantify alteration of knee kinematics caused by changes of TKR positioning. J Biomech 42: 665-670.
13. Bull AMJ, Kessler O, Alam M, et al. 2008. Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 466: 2491-2499.
14. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ., 1993. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286: 40-47.
15. Whiteside L, Arima A., 1985. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in a valgus total knee arthoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321: 168-173.
16. Wijdiks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF, et al. 2009. Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 91-A: 521-529.
17. Hall J, Copp S, Adelson W, et al. 2008. Extensor mechanism function in single-radius vs. multiradius femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthrop 23: 216-219.
18. Vince KG, Abdeen A, Sugimori T., 2006. The unstable total knee arthroplasty-causes and cures. J Arthrop 21: 44-49.
19. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, et al. 1998. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 356: 111-118.
20. Jones DP, Locke C, Pennington J, et al. 2006. The effect of sagittal laxity on function after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. J Arthrop 21: 719-723.