Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: Relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 507-515

  La Rocca, Andres Pascual ^a   Alemany, Antonio Santos ^a   Levi Jr , Paul ^b   Juan, Monica Vicario ^a   Molina, Jose Nart ^a   Weisgold, Arnold S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT INTERNACIONAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

buccal plate; cone beam CT; implant

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH APEX; TOOTH CROWN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870240806     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318271d487     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Hirschfeld I. A study of skulls in the American Museum of Natural History in relation to periodontal disease. J Dent Res. 1923;5:241-265.
2. O'Connor TW, Biggs N. Interproxi-mal craters. J Periodont. 1964;35:46-57.
3. Morris ML. The position of the margin of the gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1958;11:969-984.
4. Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20:570-577.
5. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A concept of osseous surgery and its clinical applications. In: Ward HL, Chas C, eds. A Peri-odontal Point of View: A Practical Expression of Current Problems Integrating Basic Science With Clinical Data. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publishing Co.; 1973:276-323.
6. Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, ed. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1989:477-514.
7. Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival pheno-types in young male adults. J Clin Perio-dontol. 1997;24:65-71.
8. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:428-433.
9. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1969;13:87-102.
10. Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following non surgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13:654-657.
11. Weisgold A. Contours of the full crown restoration. Alpha Omegan. 1977; 7:77-89.
12. Sanavi F, Weisgold AS, Rose LF. Biologic width and its relation to periodon-tal biotypes. J Esthet Dent. 1988;10:157-163.
13. Pontoriero R, Carnevale G. Surgical crown lengthening: A 12-month clinical gingival biotype 963 wound healing study. J Periodontol. 2001;72:841-848.
14. Baldi C, Pini-Prato G, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1077-1084.
15. Huang LH, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcomes of coro-nally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1729-1734.
16. Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: A systematic review. J Periodontol. 2006; 77:1625-1634.
17. Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, et al. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:121-129.
18. Aziz T, Flores-Mir C. A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandib-ular incisors and gingival recession. Aust Orthod J. 2011;27:33-39.
19. Chaturvedi R, Das T, Gupta J, et al. Mucogingival considerations following orthodontic therapy: A case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32:38-41.
20. JCO Interviews. Dr Birte Melsen on adult orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2006;40:703-716.
21. Kois JC. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: Five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25:895-896.
22. Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent. 2011;20:e38-e47.
23. Saadoun AP, Touati B. Soft tissue recession around implants: Is it still unavoidable?dPart I. Pract Proced Aes-thet Dent. 2007;19:81-87.
24. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:73-80.
25. Beker DL, Seimour GL. The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession. J Clin Periodontol. 1976;3:208-219.
26. Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, et al. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations:1-year prospective study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1048-1055.
27. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, et al. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla:3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:746-753.
28. Eghbali A, De Rouck T, De Bruyn H, et al. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:958-963.
29. Alpiste-Illueca F. Dimensions of the dentogingival unit in maxillary anterior teeth: A new exploration technique (parallel profile radiograph). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 4:386-396.
30. Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Kononen E. Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:439-442.
31. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23:839-845.
32. Ursell MJ. Relationships between alveolar bone levels measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol. 1989;16:81-86.
33. Kan J, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois J. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: An evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in human. J Periodontol. 2003;74:557-562.
34. Kan J, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Gingival biotype assessment in the aesthetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:237-243.
35. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, et al. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol. 2010; 81:569-574.
36. Cook R, Mealey B, Verrett R, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: An in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:345-354.
37. Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, et al. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1168-1171.
38. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1261-1266.
39. Ueno D, Sato J, Igarashi C, et al. Accuracy of oral mucosal thickness measurements using spiral computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011;82:829-836.
40. Benavides E, Rios H, Ganz S, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012;21:78-86.
41. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, et al. Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:431-436.
42. Sammartino G, Marenzi G, di Lauro AE, et al. Aesthetics in oral implantology: Biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects. Implant Dent. 2007;16:54-65.
43. Cardarapoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:809-818.
44. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodont. 2005;32:212-218.
45. Teughels W, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of inter-proximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(suppl 4):134-145.
46. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:645-652.
47. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:820-828.
48. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:113-119.
49. Bashutski JD, Wang HL. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent. 2007;16:340-348.
50. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillo-fac Implants. 2004;19(suppl):43-61.
51. Belser U, Martin W, Jung R, et al. ITI Treatment Guide, Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone. Single-tooth Replacements. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd; 2007;43-45.
52. Braut V, Bornstein M, Belser U, et al. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone walldA retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:125-131.
53. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, et al. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:22-29.
54. Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:37-42.
55. Maynard GJ, Wilson RD. Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. Dent Clin North Am. 1980;24:683-703.