Networking and knowledge exchange to promote the formation of transdisciplinary coalitions and levels of agreement among transdisciplinary peer reviewers

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Lobb, Rebecca ^a,b   Petermann, Lisa ^c,d   Manafo, Elizabeth ^c,e   Keen, Deb ^c   Kerner, Jon ^c  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Canadian Partnership Against Cancer   (Canada)

^d Mental Health Commission of Canada   (Canada)

^e RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

cancer; chronic disease; community health planning; community networks; health promotion; primary prevention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER; COOPERATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER REVIEW; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARD;

CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANNING; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;

EID: 84870237008     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31823991c2     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. World Health Organization, Director-General's Office, Communications Office. Almost 90% of All Deaths in Canada Are Due to Chronic Disease. Chronic Diseases and Their Control Press Release WHO; 59. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/press-release/2006/PR-59. pdf. Accessed March 24, 2010.
2. Hopkins DP, Razi S, Leeks KD, Priya Kalra G, Chattopadhyay SK, Soler RE. Smokefree policies to reduce tobacco use a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 38(2) (suppl):S275-S289.
3. Katz DL, O'Connell M, Yeh MC, Nawaz H, Njike V, Anderson LM. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings: a report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-10):1-12.
4. Khan LK, Sobush K, Keener D, Goodman K, Lowry A, Kakietek J. Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58(RR-7):1-26.
5. Increasing physical activity. A report on recommendations of the task force on community preventive services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-18):1-14.
6. Kerner JF. Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):193-198. (Pubitemid 351301648)
7. Bentley C, Browman GP, Poole B. Conceptual and practical challenges for implementing the communities of practice model on a national scale-a Canadian cancer control initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:3.
8. Graham AL, Kerner JF, Quinlan KM, Vinson C, Best A. Translating cancer control research into primary care practice: a conceptual framework. Am J Lifest Med. 2008;2:241-249.
9. Butler-Jones D. Public health science and practice: from fragmentation to alignment. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(1) (suppl):1-4.
10. Lasker RD, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health. 2003;80(1):14-47; discussion 8-60.
11. Lavis JN. Research, public policymaking, and knowledgetranslation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges. J Cont Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:37-45.
12. Lomas J. Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19(3):236-240.
13. Kerner J. Cancer Control. In: Elwood JM, Sutcliffe SB, eds. Chapter 5 Integrating Science with Service in Cancer Control: Closing the Gap Between Discovery and Delivery. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2010.
14. Mitchell P, Pirkis J, Hall J, Haas M. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14(2):104-111.
15. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G. Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P, eds. From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2005:13-26.
16. Smith PM. A transdisciplinary approach to research on work and health: what is it, what could it contribute, and what are the challenges? Crit Public Health. 2007;17(2):159-169. (Pubitemid 46995437)
17. Minkler M, Blackwell AG, Thompson M, Tamir H. Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1210-1213. (Pubitemid 38480179)
18. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers' engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Sci Commun. 2004;25(3):246-259. (Pubitemid 38254743)
19. Cheadle A, Senter S, Solomon L, Beery WL, Schwartz PM. A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community health partnerships: collaborationversus issue-oriented approaches. J Urban Health. 2005;82(4):638-652. (Pubitemid 41758610)
20. Wallerstein NB, Yen IH, Syme SL. Integration of social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 101(5):822-830.
21. Geneau R, Legowski B, Stachenko S. An intersectoral network for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Alberta healthy living network. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(4):153-161.
22. Kegler MC, Painter JE, Twiss JM, Aronson R, Norton BL. Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):300-310.
23. Colditz GA, Emmons KM, Vishwanath K, Kerner JF. Translating science to practice: community and academic perspectives. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):144-149. (Pubitemid 351301641)
24. Emmons KM, Viswanath K, Colditz GA. The role of transdisciplinary collaboration in translating and disseminating health research: lessons learned and exemplars of success. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2) (suppl):S204-S210. (Pubitemid 351932072)
25. Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2) (suppl):S116-S123. (Pubitemid 351932073)
26. Huberman A. Improving social practice through the utilization of university-based knowledge. Higher Educ. 1983;12(3):257-272.
27. Gajda R. Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. Am J Eval. 2004;25(1):65-77. (Pubitemid 38187530)
28. Manafo E, Petermann L, Lobb R, Keen D, Kerner J. Research, practice, and policy partnerships in pan-Canadian coalitions for cancer and chronic disease prevention. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011;17(6):E1-E11.
29. Center for Scientific Review. The peer review process. National Institutes of Health. http://cms.csr.nih.gov/aboutcsr/ overviewofpeerreviewprocess.htm. Accessed September 19, 2011.
30. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Understand peer review: process (start to finish). http://www.cihrirsc.gc.ca/e/39382.html. Accessed September 15, 2011.
31. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-428.
32. Himmelman AT. On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. Am J Commun Psychol. 2001;29(2):277-284.
33. Hodgson C. How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(11):1189-1195. (Pubitemid 27501055)
34. Hodgson C. Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11(10):864-868.
35. Mayo NE, Brophy J, Goldberg MS, Klein MB, Miller S, Platt RW, et al. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(8):842-848. (Pubitemid 44040875)