Foveated 3D graphics

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Guenter, Brian ^a   Finch, Mark ^a   Drucker, Steven ^a   Tan, Desney ^a   Snyder, John ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Antialiasing; Eccentricity; Minimum angle of resolution (MAR); Multiresolution gaze contingent display (MGCD)

Indexed keywords

3D GRAPHICS; ANGULAR SIZES; ANTI-ALIASING ALGORITHMS; DISPLAY RESOLUTIONS; ECCENTRICITY; FIELD OF VIEWS; FOVEATION; GAZE POINT; GAZE-CONTINGENT; HIGH QUALITY; IMAGE LAYERS; MINIMUM ANGLE OF RESOLUTION; PSYCHOPHYSICAL; RENDERING QUALITY; SAMPLING RATES; THREE-LAYER; USER STUDY;

ANTI-ALIASING; IMAGE MATCHING;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84870216566     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2366145.2366183     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. BAUDISCH, P., DECARLO, D., DUCHOWSKI, A. T., AND GEISLER, W. S. 2003. Focusing on the essential: considering attention in display design. Commun. ACM 46 (March), 60-66.
2. BERGSTRÖM, P. 2003. Eye-movement Controlled Image Coding. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
3. CHENG, I. 2003. Foveated 3D model simplification. In Proceedings, Signal Processing and its Applications, 241-244.
4. COLENBRANDER, A. 2001. Vision and vision loss. In Duane's Clinical Opthalmology. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, ch. 51.
5. COOK, R. L., PORTER, T., AND CARPENTER, L. 1984. Distributed ray tracing. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 18 (January), 137-145.
6. DUCHOWSKI, A. T., AND ÇÖLTEKIN, A. 2007. Foveated gazeconingent displays for periperal LOD management, 3D visualization, and stereo imaging. ACM Trans. on Multimedia, Communications and Applications 3, 4 (Dec.).
7. DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2002. A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 34, 455-70.
8. FUNKHOUSER, T., AND SEQUIN, C. 1993. Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '93 Proceedings), vol. 27, 247-254.
9. GEISLER, W. S., AND PERRY, J. S. 2002. Real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. In Proceedings of the symposum on eye tracking research applications ETRA.
10. GUENTER, B. 1994. Motion compensated noise reduction. Tech. rep., Microsoft Research.
11. HAN, C., SUN, B., RAMAMOORTHI, R., AND GRINSPUN, E. 2007. Frequency domain normal map filtering. ACM Trans. Graph. 26 (July).
12. HORVITZ, E., AND LENGYEL, J. 1997. Perception, attention, and resources: a decision-theoretic approach to graphics rendering. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, UAI'97, 238-249.
13. LEVOY, M., AND WHITAKER, R. 1989. Gaze-directed volume rendering. Tech. rep., University of North Carolina.
14. LOSCHKY, L. C., AND MCCONKIE, G. W. 2000. User performance with gaze contingent multiresolutional displays. In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, ETRA '00, 97-103.
15. LUEBKE, D., HALEN, B., NEWFIELD, D., AND WATSON, B. 2000. Perceptually driven simplification using gaze-directed rendering. Tech. rep., University of Virginia.
16. MURPHY, H., AND DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2001. Gaze-contingent level of detail rendering. In Eurographics 2001 (Short Presentations).
17. MURPHY, H. A., AND DUCHOWSKI, A. T. 2007. Hybrid image/ model based gaze-contingent rendering. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.
18. MYSZKOWSKI, K. 2002. Perception-based global illumination, rendering, and animation techniques. In SCCG '02: Proceedings of the 18th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, 13-24.
19. NEHAB, D., SANDER, P. V., LAWRENCE, J. D., TATARCHUK, N., AND ISIDORO, J. R. 2007. Accelerating real-time shading with reverse reprojection caching. In ACM SIGGRAPH/ Eurographics Symposium on Graphics Hardware, 25-35.
20. OHSHIMA, T., YAMAMOTO, H., AND TAMURA, H. 1996. Gazedirected adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space. In Proceedings of the 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS 96), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, VRAIS '96, 103-110.
21. OLANO, M., AND BAKER, D. 2010. LEAN mapping. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, I3D '10, 181-188.
22. O'SULLIVAN, C., DINGLIANA, J., AND HOWLETT, S. 2002. Gaze-contingent algorithms for interactive graphics. In The Mind's Eyes: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, J. Hyönä, R. Radach, and H. Deubel, Eds. Elsevier Science, Oxford.
23. RAMANARAYANAN, G., FERWERDA, J., WALTER, B., AND BALA, K. 2007. Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. 26 (July).
24. REDDY, M. 1998. Specification and evaluation of level of detail selection criteria. Virtual Reality 3, 2, 132-143.
25. REDDY, M. 2001. Perceptually optimized 3D graphics. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 21, 5 (sep/oct), 68-75.
26. REINGOLD, E., LOSCHKY, L. C., MCCONKIE, G. W., AND STAMPE, D. M. 2003. Gaze-contingent multiresolution displays: an integrative review. Human Factors 45, 2, 307-28.
27. STRASBURGER, H., RENTSCHLER, I., AND JÜTTNER, M. 2011. Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. Journal of Vision 11, 5, 1-82.
28. THIBOS, L. N. 1989. Image processing by the human eye. In Visual Communications and Image Processing IV,W. A. Pearlman, Ed., Proc. SPIE 1199, 1148-1153.
29. VIRSU, V., AND ROMANO, J. 1979. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 37, 475-494.
30. WATSON, B., WALKER, N., HODGES, L. F., AND WORDEN, A. 1997. Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4 (December), 323-346.
31. WATSON, B., WALKER, N., AND HODGES, L. F. 2004. Suprathreshold control of peripheral LOD. ACM Trans. Graph. 23 (Aug.), 750-759.
32. WEAVER, K. A. 2007. Design and evaluation of a perceptually adaptive rendering system for immersive virtual reality environments. Master's thesis, Iowa State University.
33. WEYMOUTH, F. W. 1958. Visual sensory units and the minimum angle of resolution. American Journal of Opthalmology 46, 102-113.
34. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Trans. Graph. 20 (January), 39-65.