Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: Accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional fluoroscopic guidance

NeuroImage

Volumn 47, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2009, Pages

  von Jako, R A ^a   Carrino, J A ^b   Yonemura, K S ^c   Noda, G A ^d   Zhue, W ^e   Blaskiewicz, D ^e   Rajue, M ^e   Groszmann, D E ^a   Weber, G ^f  

^a GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FLUOROSCOPY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; KIRSCHNER WIRE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURONAVIGATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERTEBRA BODY;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SACRUM; SPINE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67651163423     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amiot L.P., Lang K., Putzier M., Zippel H., and Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25 5 (2000) 606-614
2. Cleary K.R., Anderson J., Brazaitis M., Devey G., DiGioia A., Freedman M., Gronemeyer D., Lathan C., Lemke H., Long D., Mun S.K., and Taylor R. Final report of the technical requirements for image-guided spine procedures Workshop, April 17-20, 1999, Ellicott City, Maryland, USA. Comput. Aided Surg. 5 3 (2000) 180-215
3. Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Loeser J.D., Bigos S.J., and Ciol M.A. Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74 4 (1992) 536-543
4. Ergur I., Akcali O., Kiray A., Kosay C., and Tayefi H. Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with biocortical purchase: an anatomical study. Eur. Spine J. 16 (2007) 1519-1523
5. Fantini G.A., Pappou I.P., Girardi F.P., et al. Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 32 (2007) 2751-2758
6. Foley K.T., and Gupta S.K. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J. Neurosurg. 97 1 Suppl (2002) 7-12
7. Gejo R., Matsui H., Kawaguchi Y., Ishihara H., and Tsuji H. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24 10 (1999) 1023-1028
8. Inamasa J., and Guiot B.H. Vascular injury and complication in neurosurgical spine surgery. Acta Neuruchir (Wien) 148 (2006) 375-387
9. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., and Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21 8 (1996) 941-944
10. Kawaguchi Y., et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 21 22 (1996) 2683-2688
11. Kulkarni S.S., Lowery G.L., Ross R.E., et al. Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of eight cases. Eur. Spine J. 12 (2003) 48-54
12. Magerl F.P. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 189 (1984) 125-141
13. Nguyen H.-.V., Akbarnia B.A., van Dam B.E., et al. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants. Spine 31 21 (2006) 2449-2453
14. Portenoy R.K. Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a review of the critical issues. J. Pain Symptom Manage 11 4 (1996) 203-217
15. Sagi H.C., Manos R., Benz R., Ordway N.R., and Connolly P.J. Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part one: results of a cadaveric study evaluating lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine 28 17 (2003) 2013-2018
16. Sagi H.C., Manos R., Park S.C., Von Jako R., Ordway N.R., and Connolly P.J. Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part two: results of a cadaveric study evaluating thoracic pedicle screw placement. Spine 28 17 (2003) E351-E354
17. Slomczykowski M., Roberto M., Schneeberger P., Ozdoba C., and Vock P. Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine 24 10 (1999) 975-982 discussion 983
18. Vaccaro A.R., Rizzolo S.J., Balderston R.A., Allardyce T.J., et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. J. Bone Joint Surg. 77A (1995) 1193-1206
19. Weinstein J.N., Spratt K.F., Sprengler D., et al. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 13 9 (1988) 1012-1018