The effect of simplicity and perceived control on perceived ease of use

Association for Information Systems - 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 1764-1776

  Lee, Dongwon ^a   Moon, Junghoon ^a   Kim, Yong Jin ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Perceived control; Perceived ease of use; Simplicity; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL FACTORS; DIRECT MANIPULATION; EASE-OF-USE; IN-CONTROL; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MIT MEDIA LAB; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PILOT TESTS; SIMPLICITY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS; WEB INTERFACE DESIGN; WORK-FLOWS;

USER INTERFACES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870181050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Arnett, D.B., Laverie, D.A., and Meiers, A. Developing parsimonious retailer equity indexes using partial least squares analysis, a method and applications, Journal of Retailing (79) 2003, pp 161-170.
2. Bartolomeo, G., Blefari Melazzi, N., Martire, F., Salsano, S., Kapellaki, S., Koutsoloukas, E., Prezerakos, G.N., Tselikas, N.D., and Venieris, I.S. The Simplicity Project and its Demonstrator: Improving Ease of Use and Personalization of ICT Services, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2006, pp. 1-6.
3. Chen, L.D., Gillenson, M., and Sherrell, D. Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective, Information and Management (39) 2002, pp 705-719.
4. Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly (13: 3) 1989, pp 319-339.
5. Davis, F.D., R.P., B., and P.R., W. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22) 1992, pp 1111-1132.
6. Dianne, C., Milena, H., and Alex, I. Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce, Information and Management (43) 2006, pp 950-963.
7. Dishaw, M.T., and Strong, D.M. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs, Information and Management (36: 1) 1999, pp 9-21.
8. Heckausen, J., and Schulz, R. A Life-Span Theory of Control, Psychological Review (102: 2) 1995, pp 284-304.
9. Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S.J., and Wieckowshi, T.S. The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology, Behaviour and Information Technology (13: 6) 1994, pp 349-361.
10. Karvonen, K. The beauty of simplicity, ACM Conference on Universal Usability 2000, pp. 85-90.
11. Kieran, M., Eileen, P., and Wynn, W.C. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources, The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems (32: 3) 2001, pp 86-112.
12. Kim, Y.J., Kishore, R., and Sanders, G.L. From DQ to EQ: Understanding data quality in the context of e-business systems, Communications of the ACM (48:10) 2005, pp 75-81.
13. Li, B., Xu, S., and Zhang, J. Enhancing clustering blog documents by utilizing author/reader comments Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference ACM-SE 45) 2007, pp 94-99
14. Liaw, S. Unerstanding user perceptions of World Wide Web environments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (18) 2002, pp 137-148.
15. Maeda, J. "Simplicity, BT Technology Journal (22, 4) 2004, pp 285-286.
16. Maeda, J. The Laws of Simplicity The MIT Press, 2006.
17. McKinsey "How businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey," in: McKinsey Survey on Internet Technologies, 2007.
18. Moon, J.W., and Kim, Y.G. Extending the TAM for the World Wide Web context, Information and Management (38) 2001, pp 217-230.
19. Nielsen, J. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity, (1st edition ed.) Peachpit Press, 1999.
20. Philips "Our Brand Promise sense and simplicity, Philips Electronics 2004a.
21. Philips "Why Simplicity?," Philips Electronics 2004b.
22. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, T.K. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations, Academy of Management Review (26: 2) 2001, pp 238-310.
23. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, T.K. The State of Psychological Ownership, Integrating and Extending a Century of Research, Review of General Psychology (7: 1) 2003, pp 84-107.
24. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J.R., and Snyder, S.S. Changing the World and Changing Self, A Two-Process Model of Perceived Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (37) 1982, pp 257-268.
25. SAP "Simplifying for Usability," in: SAP Design Guide, 2004.
26. Skinner, E.A. Perceived Control, Motivation, and Coping SAGE, CA, 1995.
27. Taylor, S., and Todd, P.A. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research (6: 4) 1995, pp 144-176.
28. Teo, T., Lim, V., and Lai, R. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage, Omega (27) 1999, pp 25-37.
29. th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, 1998.
30. Tischler, L. "The Beauty of Simplicity," in: Fast Company.com, 2005, p. 52.
31. Tranctinsky, N. Aesthetic and Apparent Usabilty: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues, ACM CHI, 1997, pp. 115-123.
32. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research (11: 4) 2000, pp 342-365.
33. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science (45: 2) 2000, pp 186-204.
34. Wrosch, C., Heckausen, J., and Lachman, M.E. Primary and Secondary Control Strategies for Managing Health and Financial Stress Across Adulthood, Psychology and Aging (15: 3) 2000, pp 387-399.