At the Papini hotel: On pragmatism in the study of international relations

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 669-691

  Franke, Ulrich ^a   Weber, Ralph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

abduction; International Relations; methodology; pragmatism; rules; theory and practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870164905     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066111404444     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adler E.The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-Cold War transformation.European Journal of International Relations. 2008;14 (2): 195-230.
2. Bauer H,Brighi EPragmatism in International Relations. Bauer HBrighi E, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009:1-9.
3. Bernstein RJThe New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1992:.
4. Bohman J.How to make a social science practical: Pragmatism, critical social science and multiperspectival theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 499-524.
5. Brandom RBBetween Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
6. Büger C,Gadinger F.Reassembling and dissecting: International relations practice from a science studies perspective.International Studies Perspectives. 2007;8 (1): 90-110.
7. Buzan B,Little R.Why international relations has failed as an intellectual project and what to do about it.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2001;30 (1): 19-39.
8. Cochran M.Deweyan pragmatism and post-positivist social science in IR.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 525-548.
9. Cull RE.The betrayal of pragmatism? Rorty's quarrel with James.Philosophy and Literature. 2000;24 (1): 83-95.
10. Debrock GProcess Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi; 2003:.
11. Deibert RJ.'Exorcismus theoriae': Pragmatism, metaphors and the return of the medieval in IR theory.European Journal of International Relations. 1997;3 (2): 167-192.
12. Derrida JLimited Inc. Wien: Passagen; 2001:.
13. Dewey JJohn Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953. Boydston JA, ed. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press; 1986 [1938]:.
14. Dewey JThe Public and its Problems. Athens: Swallow Press; 1991 [1927]:.
15. Friedrichs J.From positivist pretense to pragmatic practice: Varieties of pragmatic methodology in IR scholarship.International Studies Review. 2009;11 (3): 645-648.
16. Friedrichs J,Kratochwil F.On acting and knowing: How pragmatism can advance international relations research and methodology.International Organization. 2009;63 (4): 701-731.
17. Glock HJWhat is Analytic Philosophy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
18. Haack SEvidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 2009:.
19. Haas PM,Haas EB.Pragmatic constructivism and the study of international institutions.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 573-601.
20. Hellmann G.Letter to the editor (Brother, can you spare a paradigm? (Or was anybody ever a realist?).International Security. 2000;25 (1): 169-174.
21. Hellmann G.Creative intelligence: Pragmatism as a theory of thought and action. Paper presented at the 'Millennium' Special Issue Conference on 'Pragmatism in International Relations Theory'; 2002London; 2002.
22. Hellmann G.In conclusion: Dialogue and synthesis in individual scholarship and collective inquiry (The forum: Are dialogue and synthesis possible in international relations?).International Studies Review. 2003;5 (1): 147-150.
23. Hellmann G.Pragmatism and international relations.International Studies Review. 2009;11 (3): 638-662.
24. Hellmann GHandbuch der Internationalen Politik. Masala CSauer FWilhelm A, ed. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010:148-181.
25. Herborth B.Die via media als konstitutionstheoretische Einbahnstraße. Zur Entwicklung des Akteur-Struktur-Problems bei Alexander Wendt.Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen. 2004;11 (1): 61-87.
26. Isacoff JB.On the historical imagination of international relations: The case for a 'Deweyan reconstruction'.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 603-626.
27. James W.G. Papini and the pragmatist movement in Italy.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods. 1906;3 (13): 337-341.
28. James WThe Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover Publications; 1950 [1890]:.
29. James WWilliam James, Writings 1902-1910. Kuklick B, ed. New York: The Library of America; 1987a [1907]:479-624.
30. James WWilliam James, Writings 1902-1910. Kuklick B, ed. New York: The Library of America; 1987b [1909]:821-978.
31. James WWilliam James, Writings 1878-1899. Kuklick B, ed. New York: The Library of America; 1992 [1898]:1077-1097.
32. Katzenstein P,Sil RThe Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Reus-Smit CSnidal D, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:109-130.
33. Kessler O.Toward a sociology of the international? International relations between anarchy and world society.International Political Sociology. 2009;3 (1): 87-108.
34. King G,Keohane RO,Verba SDesigning Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994:.
35. Kratochwil FRules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
36. Kratochwil F.Of false promises and good bets: A plea for a pragmatic approach to theory building (the Tartu lecture).Journal of International Relations and Development. 2007a;10 (1): 1-15.
37. Kratochwil F.Of communities, gangs, historicity and the problem of Santa Claus: Replies to my critics.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2007b;10 (1): 57-78.
38. Kratochwil FThe Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Reus-Smit CSnidal D, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:444-461.
39. Kratochwil FPragmatism in International Relations. Bauer HBrighi E, ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009:11-25.
40. Lamberth DCWilliam James and the Metaphysics of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
41. Lapid Y.The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era.International Studies Quarterly. 1989;33 (3): 235-254.
42. Legro JW,Moravcsik A.Is anybody still a realist?.International Security. 1999;24 (2): 5-55.
43. Lewis CIPragmatism Old & New: Selected Writings. Haack S, ed. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books; 2006:517-528.
44. Mead GHMind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1974 [1934]:.
45. New Pragmatists. Misak C, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2007:.
46. Neumann IB.Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 627-651.
47. Oevermann UJenseits der Utopie. Müller-Doohm S, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1991:267-336.
48. Oevermann UDie Fallrekonstruktion. Sinnverstehen in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung. Kraimer K, ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 2000:58-156.
49. Onuf NGWorld of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 1989:.
50. Owen D.Re-orienting international relations: On pragmatism, pluralism and practical reasoning.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31 (3): 653-673.
51. Papini GTutte le opere di Giovanni Papini. Verona: Arnoldo Mondadori; 1961 [1905]:329-468.
52. Peirce CSCollected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VIII: Reviews, Correspondence, and Bibliography. Burks AW, ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1966 [1905]:165-170.
53. Peirce CSThe Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1 (1867-1893). Houser NKloesel C, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1992a [1868]:28-55.
54. Peirce CSThe Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1 (1867-1893). Houser NKloesel C, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1992b [1869]:56-82.
55. Peirce CSThe Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1 (1867-1893). Houser NKloesel C, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1992c [1878]:186-199.
56. Peirce CSThe Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1998 [1903]:208-225.
57. Pouliot V.The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities.International Organization. 2008;62 (2): 257-288.
58. Puchala DJ.Woe to the orphans of the scientific revolution.Journal of International Affairs. 1990;44 (1): 59-80.
59. Puchala DJ.The pragmatics of international history.Mershon International Studies Review. 1995;39 (1): 1-18.
60. Putnam HPragmatism: An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995:.
61. Putnam RA100 Years of Pragmatism: William James's Revolutionary Philosophy. Stuhr JJ, ed. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press; 2010:185-193.
62. Rorty RConsequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press; 1982:.
63. Rorty RPhilosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books; 1999 [1994]:.
64. Rytövuori-Apunen H.Forget 'post-positivist' IR! The legacy of IR theory as the locus for a pragmatist turn.Cooperation and Conflict. 2005;40 (2): 147-177.
65. Rytövuori-Apunen H.Abstractive observation as the key to the 'primacy of practice'.International Studies Review. 2009;11 (3): 641-645.
66. Smith SThe Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Reus-Smit CSnidal D, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:725-732.
67. Stuhr JJ100 Years of Pragmatism: William James's Revolutionary Philosophy. Stuhr JJ, ed. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press; 2010:194-207.
68. Vasquez J.The realist paradigm and degenerative vs. progressive research programs: An appraisal of neotraditional research on Waltz's balancing proposition.American Political Science Review. 1997;91 (4): 899-912.
69. Waltz KNTheory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979:.
70. Wendt A.The agent-structure problem in international relations theory.International Organization. 1987;41 (3): 335-370.
71. Wendt ASocial Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
72. West CThe American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1989:.
73. Wight C.Inside the epistemological cave all bets are off.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2007;10 (1): 40-56.