Inaccusatività tardo-latina e suoi riflessi in testi italiani antichi centro-meridionali

Zeitschrift fur Romanische Philologie

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 300-331

  Cennamo, Michela ^a  

^a NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870098948     PISSN: 00498661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/zrph.1999.115.2.300     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bertinetto, P. M. (1991) „II verbo”, in L. Renzi & G. Salvi (a cura di) Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, vol. II. Bologna: II Mulino, 13-163.
2. Cennamo, M. (1993) The Reanalysis of Reflexives: a Diachronie Perspective. Napoli: Liguori.
3. ― (1995) „Patterns of active syntax in Late Latin pleonastic reflexives”, in stampa in D. Bentley & J. C. Smith (eds.) Proceedings ofthe XII International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Selected Papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. ― (1997) „Uextended accusative” e le nozioni di voce e relazione grammaticale nel latino tardo e medievale”, in stampa in R. Sornicola (ed) Langue Ecrite et Langue Parlee. Napoli: Universita di Napoli.
5. ― (1998) „Transitivita e Inaccusativita in testi antichi abruzzesi e napoletani”, in P. Ramat & E. Roma (a cura di) Atti del XXX Congresso della Societä di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, 93-109.
6. ― (1999) „Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusativity Hypothesis”. Transactions ofthe Philological Society 97, 1: 103-150.
7. ― (in prep. a) Unaccusativity in some Campanian varieties: a syntactico-semantic account.
8. ― (in prep. b) Transitivity and Argument Structure: a Diachronic/Variational Study.
9. Centineo, G. (1986) „A lexical theory of auxiliary selection in Italian”. Davies Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 1-35.
10. Comrie, B. (1976) Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. ― (1985) „Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology”, in T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III, 309-348.
12. ― (1989) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Dahlen, E. (1964) Etudes Syntaociques sur Certains Verbes Pronominaux en Latin et en Langues Romanes, Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
14. De Blasi, N. (1995) „Kampanien” in G. Holtus et al. (eds.) Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, vol. II, 2. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 175-189.
15. Dixon, D. R. (1979) „Ergativity”, Language 55, 1: 59-138.
16. ― (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Durante, M. (1981) Dal Latino all'Italiano Modemo. Bologna: Zanichelli.
18. Gerola, B. (1950) „Aspetti della sintassi del nominativo e dell'accusativo nel tardo latino”. Atti deWIstituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 108 (1949/
19. Class-e di Scienze morali e lettere, 207-236.
20. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel: Dordrecht.
21. Giacalone Ramat, A. (1995a) „Sulla grammaticalizzazione dei verbi di movimento: andare e venire + gerundio”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 53: 168-203.
22. ― (1995b) „On some grammaticalization patterns for auxiliaries”, in stampa in R. Hogg et al. (eds) Proceedings of the XII International Conference onHistorical Linguistics. Selected Papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23. Klaiman, M. H. (1991a) „Control and grammar”, Linguistics 29: 623-651.
24. ― (199Ib) Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. La Fauci, N. (1984) „Sulla natura assolutiva del controllore dell'accordo del participio passato in italiano”. La Memoria: Annali deüa Facolta di Lettere del-VUniversita di Palermo 3: 187-253.
26. ― (1991) „La continuita nella diversita formale: aspetti di morfosintassi diacronica romanza”, in V. Orioles (ed.) Innovazione e Conservazione neue Lingue.
27. Atti del Convegno della Societa Italiana di Glottologia, Pisa: Giardini, 135-168.
28. ― (1992) „Capitoli di morfosintassi siciliana antica. Tassonomia dei costrutti medi e ausiliari perfettivi”, in Studi Linguistici Offerti a Girolamo Caracausi.
29. Palermo: Centro di Studi Linguistici e Alologici Siciliani, 185-200.
30. ― (1994) Objects and Subjects in the Formation of Romance Morphosyntax, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
31. Ledgeway, A. (1995) A Diachronie Grammar of the Neapolitan Dialect, MS. University of Manchester.
32. ― (1996) The Grammar of Complementation in the Neapolitan Dialect. PhD. thesis. Manchester: University of Manchester.
33. Lehmann, Ch. (1985) „Ergative and active traits in Latin”, in F. Plank (ed.) Relational Grammar. Berlin: Mouton, 243-267.
34. ― (1988) „Predicate classes and participation”, in Studies in General Comparative Linguistics. Köln: Akup, 33-77.
35. Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. (1989) „An approach to unaccusative mismatches”. Proceedings of the North-East Linguistics Society 19: 314-328.
36. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav (1995) Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
37. Löfstedt, E. (1911) Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
38. ― (1933) Syntactica, vol. 2. Lund: Gleerup.
39. Merlan, F. (1985) „Split Intransitivity: functional oppositions in intransitive inflection”, in J. Nichols & A. C. Woodbury (eds.) Grammar inside and Outside the Clause. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 324-362.
40. Mithun, M. (1991) „Active/Agentive case marking and its motivations”. Language 67.3: 511-546.
41. Norberg, D. (1943) Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins. Uppsala: Lundequistiska Bokhandeln.
42. ― (1944) Beiträge zur Spätlateinischen Syntax. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
43. Perlmutter, D. M. (1978) „Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis”. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157-189.
44. ― (1989) „Multiattachment and the Unaccusative Hypothesis: the perfect auxiliary in Italian”. Probus 1,1: 63-119.
45. Pinkster, H. (1985) „The Strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Romance”, in M. Harris & P. Ramat (eds.) Historical Development of auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Grutter.
46. Plank, F. (1985) „The extended accusative/restricted nominative in perspective”, in F. Plank (ed.) Relational Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 113-140.
47. Ramat, P. (1984) Linguistica Tipologica. Bologna: II Mulino.
48. Rappaport, M. (1988) „Unaccusativity and verbs of motion”, Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on English and Greek: Description and/or Comparison of the two Languages. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.
49. Rohlfs, G. (1968/69) Grammatica Storica della Lingua Italiana e dei suoi Dialetti, vol. 2, 3. Torino: Einaudi.
50. Sapir, E. (1917) Recensione di Uhlenbeck 1917. Internationaljournal of American Linguistics. 1: 82-86.
51. Schiaffini, A. (1954) Testi Fiorentini del Dugento e dei primi del Trecento. Firenze: Sansoni.
52. Siewierska, A. (1984) The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.
53. Sorace, A. (1993a) „Incomplete vs divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian”. Second Language Research 9: 22-47.
54. ― (1993b) „Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: symmetries and predictable indeterminacy”. Journal of French Language Studies 3: 71-93.
55. ― (1995a) „Acquiring linking rules and argument structure in a second language: the unaccusative/unergative distinction”, in L. Eubank, L. Selinker, M. Smith (eds.) The Current State of Interlanguage. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 153-175.
56. ― (1995b) „Constraintes semantiques sur la syntaxe: l'acquisition de rinaccusativite en Italien L”. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangere 5: 79-113.
57. Sornicola, R. (1996) „Alcune strutture con pronome espletivo nei dialetti italiani meridionali”, in P. Benincä et al. (a cura di) Italiani e Dialetti nel Tempo. Roma: Bulzoni, 323-340.
58. Thielmann, Ph. (1885) „Habere mit dem Part. Perf. Pass.”. Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik 2: 372-423; 509-549.
59. Väänänen, V. (1966) Le Latin Vulgaire des Inscriptions Pompeiennes, 3a ed. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
60. ― (1971) Introduzione al Latino Volgare. Bologna-Patron.
61. Van Valin, R. D. Jr. (1990) „Semantic parameters of split intransitivity”, Language 66.2: 221-260.
62. ― (1993) „A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar”, in R. D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.) Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, l-164.
63. Vendler, Z. (1967) Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
64. Vignuzzi, U. (1992) „Gli Abruzzi e il Molise”, in F. Bruni (a cura di) Ultaliano neue Regioni. Lingua Nationale e Identita Regionale. Torino: Utet, 594-628.
65. Vincent, N. (1982) „The development of the auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance”, in N. Vincent & M. Harris (eds.) Studies in the Romance Verb. London: Croom Helm, 71-96.
66. Zamboni, A. (1996) „Dal latino tardo al romanzo arcaico: aspetti diacronicotipologici della flessione nominale”, in P. Ramat & E. Roma (a cura di), Atti del XXX Congresso della Societa di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, 127-46.