Nanometrical evaluation of direct laser implant surface

Surface and Interface Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 1582-1586

  Ricci, M ^a   Mangano, F ^b   Tercio, T ^a   Tonelli, P ^d   Barone, A ^c   Raspanti, M ^b   Covani, U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b Gravedona   (Italy)

^c Versilia General Hospital   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

atomic force microscopy; implant; laser

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; FORMING; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); LASERS; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TERNARY ALLOYS; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

DIRECT LASER FABRICATIONS; DIRECT LASER FORMING; IMPLANT SURFACE; OSTEOBLAST ADHESION; PEAK-TO-PEAK VALUES; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ROUGHNESS; TITANIUM DISCS;

METAL IMPLANTS;

EID: 84870058834     PISSN: 01422421     EISSN: 10969918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sia.5087     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. O. Bahat, R. M. Sullivan,. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2010, 12 (Suppl 1), e2-12. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
2. T. Albrektsson, P. I. BrÃ¥nemark, H. A. Hansson, J. Lindström,. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1981, 52 (2), 155-70.
3. M. Aboushelib, N. Salem, A. Abotaleb, N. Abd El Moniem,. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique. J. Oral Implantol. 2011 Sep 9. [Epub ahead of print]
4. M. Annunziata, A. Oliva, M. A. Basile, M. Giordano, N. Mazzola, A. Rizzo, A. Lanza, L. Guida,. The effects of titanium nitride-coating on the topographic and biological features of TPS implant surfaces. J. Dent. 2011, 39 (11), 720-8.
5. W. C. Vrouwenvelder, C. G. Groot, K. de Groot,. Better histology and biochemistry for osteoblasts cultured on titanium-doped bioactive glass: bioglass 45S5 compared with iron-, titanium-, fluorine- and boron-containing bioactive glasses. Biomaterials 1994, 15 (2), 97-106.
6. U. Hempel, T. Hefti, P. Dieter, F. Schlottig,. Response of human bone marrow stromal cells, MG-63, and SaOS-2 to titanium-based dental implant surfaces with different topography and surface energy. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct 21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02328.x.
7. P. M. Brett, J. Harle, V. Salih, R. Mihoc, I. Olsen, F. H. Jones, M. Tonetti,. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004, 35 (1), 124-33.
8. J. Lincks, B. D. Boyan, C. R. Blanchard, C. H. Lohmann, Y. Liu, D. L. Cochran, D. D. Dean, Z. Schwartz,. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998, 19 (23), 2219-32.
9. D. L. Cochran, P. V. Nummikoski, A. A. Jones, S. R. Makins, T. J. Turek, D. Buser,. Radiographic analysis of regenerated bone around endosseous implants in the canine using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1997, 12 (6), 739-48.
10. A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson,. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2010, 25 (1), 63-74.
11. A. B. Novaes Jr, S. L. Souza, P. T. de Oliveira, A. M. Souza,. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2002, 17 (3), 377-83.
12. D. Buser, R. K. Schenk, S. Steinemann, J. P. Fiorellini, C. H. Fox, H. Stich,. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1991, 25 (7), 889-902.
13. A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, B. Andersson,. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1996, 11 (1), 38-45.
14. K. Gotfredsen, G. E. Carlsson, A. Jokstad, K. Arvidson Fyrberg, M. Berge, B. Bergendal, T. Bergendal, J. E. Ellingsen, J. Gunne, M. Hofgren, B. Holm, F. Isidor, S. Karlsson, E. Klemetti, N. P. Lang, T. Lindh, M. Midtbø, M. Molin, T. Närhi, K. Nilner, B. Owall, B. Pjetursson, E. Saxegaard, S. Schou, R. Stokholm, B. Thilander, C. Tomasi, A Wennerberg. Scandinavian Society for Prosthetic Dentistry; Danish Society of Oral Implantology. Implants and/or teeth: consensus statements and recommendations. J. Oral Rehabil. 2008, 35 (Suppl 1), 2-8.
15. K. Kieswetter, Z. Schwartz, T. W. Hummert, D. L. Cochran, J. Simpson, D. D. Dean, B. D. Boyan,. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1996, 32 (1), 55-63.
16. C. Mangano, F. G. Mangano, J. A. Shibli, M. Ricci, V. Perrotti, S. d'Avila, A. Piattelli,. Immediate Loading of Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Unsplinted Direct Laser Metal Forming (DLMF) Implants. Results From a 1-Year Prospective Study. J. Periodontol. 2012, 83 (1), 70-8.
17. Pechkova E., S. V. Roth, M. Burghammer, D. Fontani, C. Riekel, C. Nicolini,. μGISAXS and protein nanotemplate crystallization methods and instrumentation. J Synchroton Radiat 2005, 12, 713-716.
18. M. Thieme, K. P. Wieters, F. Bergner, D. Scharnweber, H. Worch, J. Ndop, T. J. Kim, W. Grill,. Titanium powder sintering for preparation of a porous functionally graded material destined for orthopaedic implants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2001, 12 (3), 225-31.
19. L. Le Guehennec, E. Goyenvalle, M. A. Lopez-Heredia, P. Weiss, Y. Amouriq, P. Layrolle,. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008, 19 (11), 1103-10.
20. O. Zinger, K. Anselme, A. Denzer, P. Habersetzer, M. Wieland, J. Jeanfils, P. Hardouin, D. Landolt,. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials 2004, 25 (14), 2695-711.
21. P. M. Brett, J. Harle, V. Salih, R. Mihoc, I. Olsen, F. H. Jones, M. Tonetti,. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004, 35 (1), 124-33.
22. D. E. Ingber, I. Tensegrity,. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (Pt 7), 1157-73.
23. M. Lind, C. Bünger,. Factors stimulating bone formation. Eur. Spine J. 2001, 10 (Suppl 2), S102-9.
24. B. D. Boyan, T. W. Hummert, D. D. Dean, Z. Schwartz,. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996, 17 (2), 137-46. Review.
25. J. D. Andrande,. Principle of protein adsorption. In Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers (Ed:, J. Andrade,). Plenum, New York, 1985, pp. 1-80.
26. T. A. Horbett,. Protein adsorption on biomaterials. In Biomaterials: Interfacial Phenomena and Applications. ACS advances in chemistry series, Vol 199 (Eds:, S. L. Cooper, N. A. Peppas,). American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1982, pp. 233-244.
27. A. J. García, P. Ducheyne, D. Boettiger,. Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998, 40 (1), 48-56.
28. A. Rosengren, E. Pavlovic, S. Oscarsson, A. Krajewski, A. Ravaglioli, A. Piancastelli,. Plasma protein adsorption pattern on characterized ceramic biomaterials. Biomaterials 2002, 23 (4), 1237-47.
29. R. M. London, F. A. Roberts, D. A. Baker, M. D. Rohrer, R. B. O'Neal,. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2002, 17 (3), 369-76.
30. K. Kieswetter, Z. Schwartz, T. W. Hummert, D. L. Cochran, J. Simpson, D. D. Dean, B. D. Boyan,. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1996, 32 (1), 55-63.