Donor identification 'kills gamete donation'? A response

Human Reproduction

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3380-3384

  Allan, Sonia ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

donor anonymity; donor conception; gamete donation; justice; retrospective legislation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; DONOR; GAMETE; GAMETE DONATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT INFORMATION;

EID: 84870039712     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des351     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allan S. Submission to the Senate Committee Inquiry into Donor Conception. Access to Genetic Information and Donor Identification, Submission No 30, Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary- Business/Committees/Senate-Committees?url=legcon-ctte/donor-conception/ submissions.htm.
2. Allan S. Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia. J L Med 2011;19:354-376.
3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 19-20.
4. Chisholm R. Information rights and donor conception: lessons from adoption? J L Med 2012;19:22-735.
5. Crawshaw MA, Blyth ED, Daniels KD. Past semen donors' views about the use of a voluntary contact register. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14:411-417.
6. Daniels K, Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Curson R. Short communication: previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1670-1675.
7. Donor. Victorian assisted reproductive treatment authority time to tell seminar. Public communications by donor, parents and donor-conceived individuals, 2011.
8. Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corp (1994) 179 CLR 297.
9. Greenberg D (ed.). Craies on Legislation: A Practitioner's Guide to the Nature, Process, Effect and Interpretation of Legislation, 8th edn. UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
10. L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates Unitramp SA v Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Co Ltd (The Boucraa) [1994] 1 All ER 486, 525 (Sir Thomas Bingham MR).
11. Mahlstedt P, Probasco K. Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 1991;56:747-753.
12. Odièvre v. France. Application, no. 42326/98. European Court of Human Rights, 13 February 2003.
13. Pennings G. How to kill gamete donation: retrospective legislation and donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 2012;27:2881-2885.
14. R v Kidman (1915) 20 CLR 425 per Isaacs, Higgins, Gavan Duffy, Powers and Rich JJ (Griffith CJ dissenting).
15. Robinson J, Forman R, Clark A, Egan D, Chapman M, Barlow D. Attitudes of donors and recipients to gamete donation. Hum Reprod 1991; 6:307-309.
16. Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee. Donor conception practices in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, 2011.
17. Victorian Law Reform Committee. Inquiry into access by donor-conceived people to information about donors, Parliamentary Paper No. 120. Australia: Parliament of Victoria, 2012.