|
Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 354-376
|
Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia.
a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACCESS TO INFORMATION;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
AUSTRALIA;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
DONOR;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
OOCYTE DONATION;
ACCESS TO INFORMATION;
AUSTRALIA;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
DISCLOSURE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS;
MALE;
OOCYTE DONATION;
TISSUE DONORS;
|
EID: 84859414780
PISSN: 1320159X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|