The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. EPA

Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 129-144

  Osofsky, Hari M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870036249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511596766.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Neil Brenner, New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood 9 (2004)
2. Nathan F. Sayre, Ecological and Geographical Scale: Parallels and Potential for Integration, 29 Progress Hum. Geography 276, 281 (2005).
3. Holly Doremus, Science Plays Defense: Natural Resource Management in the Bush Administration, Ecology L.Q. 249 (2005)
4. Holly Doremus & A. Dan Tarlock, Science, Judgment, and Controversy in Natural Resource Regulation, 26 Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev. 1 (2005)
5. Holly Doremus, The Purposes, Effects, and Future of the Endangered Species Act's Best Available Science Mandate, 34 Envtl. L. 397 (2004)
6. Holly Doremus, Listing Decisions under the Endangered Species Act: Why Better Science Isn't Always Better Policy, 75 Wash. U. L.Q. 1029 (1997).
7. Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making (Ronald D. Brunner et al. eds., 2005)
8. Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research (Wendy Wagner&Rena Steinzor eds., 2006)
9. Donald T. Hornstein, Accounting for Science: The Independence of Public Research in the New, Subterranean Administrative Law, 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 227 (2003).
10. Louis Lebel, Po Garden & Masao Imamura, The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region, 10 Ecology & Soc'y 18 (2005)
11. James McCarthy, Scale, Sovereignty, and Strategy in Environmental Governance, 37(4) Antipode 731 (2005)
12. Erik Swyngedouw, Scaled Geographies: Nature, Place, and the Politics of Scale, in Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method 129 (Eric Shepard & Robert B. McMaster eds., 2004).
13. Holly Doremus, Science Plays Defense: Natural Resource Management in the Bush Administration, Ecology L.Q. 258 (2005)
14. Luntz Research Companies, Straight Talk, The Environment: A Cleaner, Safer, Healthier America 138, available at http://www.luntzspeak.com/graphics/LuntzResearch.Memo.pdf (last visited June 16, 2008).
15. Frederic L. Kirgis, Fuzzy Logic and the Sliding Scale Theorem, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 421, 422-23 (2002).
16. Hari M. Osofsky, The Geography of Climate Change Litigation: Implications for Transnational Regulatory Governance, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1789 (2005)
17. Joseph Smith&David Shearman, Climate Change Litigation: Analysing the Law, Scientific Evidence & Impacts on the Environment, Health & Property (2006)
18. Roda Verheyen, Climate Change Damage and International Law, Prevention Duties and State Responsibility (2005)
19. William C.G. Burns, The Exigencies That Drive Potential Causes of Action for Climate Change Damages at the International Level, 98 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 223 (2004)
20. Richard W. Thackeray, Jr., Note, Struggling for Air: The Kyoto Protocol, Citizens' Suits under the Clean Air Act, and the United States' Options for Addressing Global Climate Change, 14 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 855, 884-98 (2004).
21. International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA), Global Warming Petitioners, http://www.icta.org/doc/global%20warming%20petitioners%20final.pdf (last visited June 16, 2008)
22. EPA Organizational Chart, http://www.epa.gov/epahome/organization.htm (last visited June 16, 2008).
23. Hari M. Osofsky, The Geography of Climate Change Litigation Part II: Narratives of Massachusetts v. EPA, 8 Chi. J. Int'l L. 573 (2008)
24. Hari M. Osofsky, Climate Change Litigation as Pluralist Legal Dialogue?, 26 Stan. Envtl. L.J. & 43 Stan. J. Int'l L. 181 (2007)
25. Judith Resnik, Law's Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism's Multiple Ports of Entry, 115 Yale L.J. 1564 (2006).
26. Hari M. Osofsky, Is Climate Change "International"?: Litigation's Diagonal Regulatory Role, 49 Va. J. Int'l L. 585 (2009).
27. Kirsten H. Engel, State Environmental Standard-Setting: Is There a "Race" and Is It "to the Bottom"?, 48 Hastings L.J. 271 (1997)
28. Daniel C. Esty, Revitalizing Environmental Federalism, 95 Mich. L. Rev. (1996)
29. Joshua D. Sarnoff, The Continuing Imperative (But Only from a National Perspective) for Federal Environmental Protection, 7 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 225 (1997)
30. Peter P. Swire, The Race to Laxity and the Race to Undesirability: Explaining Failures in Competition Among Jurisdictions in Environmental Law, 14 Yale J. on Reg. 67 (1996)
31. Henry N. Butler&Jonathan R. Macey, Externalities and the Matching Principle: The Case for Reallocating Environmental Regulatory Authority, 14 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 23 & 14 Yale J. on Reg. 23 (1996)
32. Richard L. Revesz, Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the "Race-to-the-Bottom" Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation, 62 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1210 (1992)
33. Richard L. Revesz, The Race to the Bottom and Federal Environmental Regulation: A Response to Critics, 82 Minn. L. Rev. 535 (1997)
34. Richard B. Stewart, Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness, 102 Yale L.J. 2039 (1993).
35. William W. Buzbee, Recognizing the Regulatory Commons: A Theory of Regulatory Gaps, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (2003).
36. Osofsky, Climate Change as Pluralist Legal Dialogue?
37. http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/cms06/06-082_0a.pdf (last visited June 17, 2008)
38. http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/cms06/06-046_0a.pdf (May 2, 2006) (last visited June 17, 2008)
39. Robert Dufresne, The Opacity of Oil: Oil Corporations, Internal Violence, and International Law, 36 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 331 (2004).
40. Lillian Aponte Miranda, The Hybrid State-Corporate Enterprise and Violations of Indigenous Land Rights: Theorizing Corporate Responsibility and Accountability under International Law, 11 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 135 (2007)
41. Hari M. Osofsky, Learning from Environmental Justice: A New Model for International Environmental Rights, 24 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 71, 72-76 (2005).
42. Alexander Murphy, Geography's Place in Higher Education in the United States, 31 J. Geographer Higher Ed. 121, 122-23 (2007)
43. William A. Koelsch, Academic Geography, American Style: An Institutional Perspective, in Geography: Discipline, Profession and Subject since 1870: An International Survey 245, 270 (Gary S. Dunbar ed., 2001)
44. Thomas J. Wilbanks & Michael Libbee, Avoiding the Demise of Geography in the United States, 31 Prof. Geographer 1, 1 (1979).
45. Mark D. Bjelland, A Place for Geography in the Liberal Arts College?, 56 Prof. Geographer 326, 326 (2004).
46. Hari M. Osofsky, A Law and Geography Perspective on the New Haven School, 32 Yale J. Int'l L. 421 (2007).
47. John M. Broder, E.P.A. Clears Way for Greenhouse Gas Rules, N.Y. Times, Apr. 17, 2009 at A15, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/18/science/earth/18endanger.html.
48. Hari M. Osofsky, Is Climate Change "International"?: Litigation's Diagonal Regulatory Role, 49 Va. J. Int'l L. 585 (2009).
49. Hari M. Osofsky, Diagonal Climate Regulation: Implications for the Obama Administration (draft on file with author)
50. Hari M. Osofsky, Scales of Law: Rethinking Climate Change, Terrorism, and the Global Financial Crisis (draft précis of monograph on file with author).