Effect of conceptual change approach on students' understanding of reaction rate concepts;Kavramsal deǧi̇şi̇m yaklaşiminin öǧrenci̇leri̇n reaksi̇yon hizi kavramlarini anlamalarina etki̇si̇

Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi

Volumn , Issue 43, 2012, Pages 306-317

  Kingir, Sevgi ^a   Geban, Ömer ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Chemistry education; Conceptual change approach; Reaction rate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869994279     PISSN: 13005340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baser, M., & Geban, O. (2007). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students' understanding of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 243-267.
2. Bilgin, I., & Geban, O. (2006). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Approach Based on Conceptual Change Condition on Students' Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium Concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 31-46.
3. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
4. Boo, H.K. (1998). Students' understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 569-581.
5. Cachapuz, A. F. C., & Maskill, R. (1987). Detecting changes with learning in the organization of knowledge: use of word association tests to follow the learning of collision theory. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 491-504.
6. Cakmakci, G., Leach, J., & Donnelly, J. (2005). Students' ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795-1815.
7. Cakmakci, G. (2010). Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 449-455.
8. Calik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers' conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 1-28.
9. Calik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students' conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 651-676.
10. Chambers, S.K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123.
11. Chandran, S., Treagust, D. F., & Tobin, K. (1987). The role of cognitive factors in chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(2), 145-160.
12. Chuephangam, M. (2000). Analysis of misconception in chemistry of Mathayom Suksa 5 students. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.grad.cmu.ac.th/abstract/2000/edu/abstract/edu11001.html
13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
14. De Posada, J. M. (1999). The presentation of metallic bonding in high school science textbooks during three decades: science educational reforms and substantive changes of tendencies. Science Education, 83, 423-447.
15. Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Students' thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view. School Science Review, 67(240), 443-456.
17. Driver, R., & Easly, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
18. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
19. Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally: conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15.
20. Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62.
21. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-96.
22. Gorodetsky, M., & Gussarsky, E. (1986). Misconceptions of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 427-441.
23. Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541-553.
24. Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, J. Y., Phares, V. L., & Suttles, C. V. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 933-946.
25. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5-14.
26. Justi, R. (2002). Teaching and learning chemical kinetics. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 293-315). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Kousathana, M., & Tsaparlis, G. (2002). Students' errors in solving numerical chemical-equilibrium problems. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(1), 5-17.
28. Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
29. Niaz, M. (2002). Facilitating conceptual change in students' understanding of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 425-439.
30. Ozkan, O., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in students' understanding of ecological concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 95-105.
31. Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853-1881.
32. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
33. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371-382.
34. Rowlands, S., & Carson, R. (2001). Contradictions in the constructivist discourse. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal (P. Ernest, Ed), 14. Retrieved November 22, 2009, from http://www.people.ex.ac.uk/PErnest/pome14/rowlands.pdf
35. Uzuntiryaki E., & Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science, 33, 311-339.
36. Van Driel, J. H. (2002). Students' corpuscular conceptions in the context of chemical equilibrium and chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(2), 201-213.
37. Van Driel, J. H., & De Vos, W. (1989). Sneller, harder, vaker. Over het onderwerp reactiesnelheid in 4-HAVO/VWO. NVON-Maandblad, 14, 291-295.
38. Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 103-116.
39. Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K-12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455-472.