Modeling reproductive trajectories of roe deer females: Fixed or dynamic heterogeneity?

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 317-328

  Plard, F ^a,b   Bonenfant, C ^a,b   Delorme, D ^c   Gaillard, J M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA CHASSE ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE   (France)

Author keywords

Fecundity; Individual quality; Life history; Reproductive status; Reproductive success

Indexed keywords

DEER; FECUNDITY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; HETEROGENEITY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MARKOV CHAIN; REPRODUCTIVE STATUS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DEER; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; DEER; FEMALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE;

EID: 84869874300     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersen R., Gaillard J.M., Linnell J.D., Duncan P. Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer. J. Anim. Ecol. 2000, 69:672-682.
2. Aubry L., Cam E., Koons D., Monnat J., Pavard S. Drivers of age-specific survival in a long-lived seabird: contributions of observed and hidden sources of heterogeneity. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80:375-383.
3. Beauplet G., Barbraud C., Dabin W., Küssener C., Guinet C. Age-specific survival and reproductive performances in fur seals: evidence of senescence and individual quality. Oikos 2006, 112:430-441.
4. Bergeron P., Baeta R., Pelletier F., Réale D., Garant D. Individual quality: tautology or biological reality?. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80:361-364.
5. Bérubé C.A.H., Festa-Bianchet M., Jorgenson J.T. Individual differences, longevity, and reproductive senescence in bighorn ewes. Ecology 1999, 80:2555-2565.
6. Bjørnstad O., Hansen T. Individual variation and population dynamics. Oikos 1994, 69:167-171.
7. Cam E., Link W.A., Cooch E.G., Monnat J.Y., Danchin E. Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:96-105.
8. Cam E., Monnat J.Y. Apparent inferiority of first-time breeders in the kittiwake: the role of heterogeneity among age classes. J. Anim. Ecol. 2000, 69:380-394.
9. Cam E., Monnat J., Royle J. Dispersal and individual quality in a long lived species. Oikos 2004, 106:386-398.
10. Caruso T., Taormina M., Migliorini M. Relative role of deterministic and stochastic determinants of soil animal community: a spatially explicit analysis of oribatid mites. J. Anim. Ecol. 2012, 81:214-221.
11. Coulson T., Tuljapurkar S., Childs D.Z. Using evolutionary demography to link life history theory, quantitative genetics and population ecology. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:1226.
12. Descamps S., Bêty J., Love O.P., Gilchrist H.G. Individual optimization of reproduction in a long-lived migratory bird: a test of the condition-dependent model of laying date and clutch size. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25:671-681.
13. Gaillard J.M., Delorme D., Jullien J.M. Effects of cohort, sex, and birth date on body development of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. Oecologia 1993, 94:57-61.
14. Gaillard J.M., Festa-Bianchet M., Yoccoz N.G., Loison A., Toigo C. Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000, 31:367-393.
15. Grøtan V., Sæther B., Filli F., Engen S. Effects of climate on population fluctuations of ibex. Glob. Change Biol. 2008, 14:218-228.
16. Hamel S., CÔté S.D., Gaillard J.M., Festa-Bianchet M. Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78:143-151.
17. Hamel S., Gaillard J.M., Festa-Bianchet M., CÔté S.D. Individual quality, early-life conditions, and reproductive success in contrasted populations of large herbivores. Ecology 2009, 90:1981-1995.
18. Jönsson K.I. Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 1997, 78:57-66.
19. Kendall B., Fox G., Fujiwara M., Nogeire T. Demography heterogeneity, cohort selection and population growth. Ecology 2011, 92:1985-1993.
20. Knape J., Jonzén N., Sköld M., Kikkawa J., McCallum H. Individual heterogeneity and senescence in Silvereyes on Heron Island. Ecology 2011, 92:813-820.
21. Laake, J., Rexstad, E., 2008. RMark - An Alternative Approach to Building Linear Models in MARK. Mark-Book. E. Cooch and White G. Appendice C.
22. Lailvaux S.P., Kasumovic M.M. Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts. Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 278:321-328.
23. Lebreton J.D., Burnham K.P., Clobert J., Anderson D.R. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 1992, 62:67-118.
24. Lebreton J., Nichols J., Barker R., Pradel R., Spendelow J. Modeling individual animal histories with multistate capture-recapture models. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2009, 41:87-173.
25. McCleery R., Perrins C., Sheldon B., Charmantier A. Age-specific reproduction in a long-lived species: the combined effects of senescence and individual quality. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:963-970.
26. McNamara J.M., Houston A.I. State-dependent life histories. Nature 1996, 380:215-221.
27. Moyes K., Morgan B., Morris A., Morris S., Clutton-Brock T., Coulson T. Individual differences in reproductive costs examined using multi-state methods. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80:456-465.
28. Nilsen E.B., Gaillard J.M., Andersen R., Odden J., Delorme D., van Laere G., Linnell J.D. A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78:585-594.
29. Nussey D.H., Coulson T.N., Festa-Bianchet M., Gaillard J.M. Measuring senescence in wild animal populations: towards a longitudinal approach. Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22:393-406.
30. Orzack S.H., Steiner U.K., Tuljapurkar S., Thompson P. Static and dynamic expression of life history traits in the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis. Oikos 2011, 120:369-380.
31. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
32. Service P.M. Heterogeneity in individual mortality risk and its importance for evolutionary studies of senescence. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:1-13.
33. Steiner U.K., Tuljapurkar S. Neutral theory for life histories and individual variability in fitness components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:4684-4689.
34. Steiner U.K., Tuljapurkar S., Orzack S.H. Dynamic heterogeneity and life history variability in the kittiwake. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:436-444.
35. Tuljapurkar S.D. Why use population entropy? It determines the rate of convergence. J. Math. Biol. 1982, 13:325-337.
36. Tuljapurkar S., Steiner U.K., Orzack S.H. Dynamics heterogeneity in life histories. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:93-106.
37. Vaupel J., Manton K., Stallard E. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 1979, 16:439-454.
38. Vaupel J.W., Yashin A.I. Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am. Stat. 1985, 39:176-185.
39. Vindenes Y., Engen S., Sæther B. Individual heterogeneity in vital parameters and demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:455-467.
40. White G.C., Burnham K.P. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 1999, 46:120-138.
41. Wilson A.J., Nussey D.H. What is individual quality? an evolutionary perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:207-214.