Application of ERICA index to evaluation of soil ecosystem health according to sustainability threshold for chemical impact

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 443, Issue , 2013, Pages 134-142

  Boriani, Elena ^a   Benfenati, Emilio ^b   Baderna, Diego ^b   Thomsen, Marianne ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fate and transport; Risk assessment; Veterinarian pharmaceuticals

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; CHEMICAL IMPACTS; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS; DEGRADATION PRODUCTS; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL OCCURRENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-FRIENDLY; FATE AND TRANSPORT; HUMAN BEING; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; MULTIPLE SOURCE; PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOUNDS; PRODUCTION CHAIN; SCORING SYSTEMS; TOLTRAZURIL;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

PONAZURIL; SULFADIAZINE; TOLTRAZURIL;

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL ECOSYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; XENOBIOTICS;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ERICA INDEX; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH HAZARD; LAW; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT SAFETY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION; XENOBIOTIC STRESS;

ECOSYSTEM; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84869869366     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Altenburger R., Greco W. Extrapolation concepts for dealing with multiple contamination in environmental risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2009, 5(1):62-68.
2. Guidance document on the assessment of the equivalence of technical materials of substances regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC, December 2005. IBM Chemical Search Alpha. assessed in 2008. http://www.chemsearch.almaden.ibm.com/chemsearch/SearchServlet.
3. Assmuth T., Hildén M. The significance of information frameworks in integrated risk assessment and management. Environ Sci Pol 2008, 11(1):71-86.
4. Benfenati E. The CAESAR project for in silico models for the REACH legislation. Chem Cent J 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):I1.
5. Boriani E. How to evaluate ecosystem health according to sustainability threshold for industry impact, need of new risk indices. J Ecosyst Ecograph 2012, 2:e105. 10.4172/2157-7625.1000e105.
6. Boriani E., Mariani A., Baderna D., Moretti C., Lodi M., Benfenati E. ERICA: a multiparametric toxicological risk index for the assessment of environmental healthiness. Environ Int 2010, 36:665-674.
7. CAESAR EC project Available at. http://www.caesar-project.eu.
8. Capleton A.C., Courage C., Rumsby P., Holmes P., Stutt E., Boxall A.B.A., Levy L.S. Prioritising veterinary medicines according to their potential indirect human exposure and toxicity profile. Toxicol Lett 2006, 163(3):213-223.
9. Commission Directive 2008/42/EC of 3 April 2008.
10. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
11. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC/* COM/2006/0232 final - COD 2006/0086 */.
12. EMEA/CVMP/182112/2006-Consultation from. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2009/10/WC500005263.pdf.
13. Gilbert N. Data gaps threaten chemical safety law. Nature 2011, 475:150-151.
14. Glenn W., Suter I.I., Cormier S.M. Why and how to combine evidence in environmental assessments: weighing evidence and building cases. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:1406-1417.
15. http://130.226.165.14/index.html.
16. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
17. http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/.
18. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/sea-legalcontext.htm.
19. http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/search.asp.
20. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0400:FIN:EN:PDF.
21. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0400:FIN:EN:PDF.
22. http://potency.berkeley.edu/cpdb.html.
23. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/.
24. http://www.antares-life.eu/index.php?sec=modellist.
25. http://www.cefic-lri.org/lri-toolbox/ambit.
26. http://www.chemspider.com/.
27. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/st00006.en09.pdf.
28. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/document_listing/document_listing_000165.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058002d89b&jsenabled=true.
29. http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/10/WC500003978.pdf.
30. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm.
31. http://www.iss.it/ampp/dati/cont.php?id=233&lang=1&tipo=7.
32. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/mc/chem%2898%2917&doclanguage=en.
33. http://www.orchestra-qsar.eu/.
34. http://www.osha.gov/.
35. http://www.qsarworld.com/qsar-datasets.php?mm=5.
36. http://www.vega-qsar.eu/.
37. http://www.wadef.com/index.php.
38. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_recycling_policy/docs/cec_monitoring_rpt.pdf.
39. Lahr J., Münier B., De Lange J.H., Faber J.F., Sørensen P.B. Wildlife vulnerability and risk maps for combined pollutants. Sci Total Environ 2010, 408(18):3891-3898.
40. OECD OECD series on principles of good laboratory practice and compliance monitoring. No. 1 OECD principles of good laboratory; practice 1998, Organization for Economic and Co-operative Development, Paris.
41. Vom Saal F., Myers J.P. Good laboratory practices are not synonymous with good scientific practices, accurate reporting, or valid data. Environ Health Perspect Perspect Correspondence 2010, 118(2):A60.
42. Pizzol M., Bulle C., Thomsen M. Indirect human exposure assessment of airborne lead deposited on soil via a simplified fate & speciation modelling approach. Sci Total Environ 2012, 421-422:203-209.
43. Quevauviller P., Olazabal C. Links between the water framework directive, the thematic strategy on soil protection and research trends with focus on pollution issues. J Soils Sediments 2003, 3(4):243-244.
44. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. OJ L 396. 2006 2006, 1-849.
45. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency.
46. Regulation (EC) No 2008/56/of 17 June 2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive).
47. Soil Thematic Strategy and Draft Proposal for a SFD (COM(2006) 232).
48. The Toxicologist 2011, 120. [March, Supplement 2].
49. Thomsen M., Faber J., Sorensen P.B. Soil ecosystem health scenarios - evaluation of ecological indicators susceptible to chemical stressors. Ecol Indic 2011, 16:67-75.
50. United Nations Economic Commission, for Europe Globally harmonized system for classification and labeling of chemicals 2009, Accessed on 5/6/2009 at http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/. 2nd Revised edition.
51. Van Leeuwen C.J., Hansen B.G., de Bruijn J.H.M. Management of industrial chemicals in the European Union (REACH). Risk Assessment of Chemicals. An Introduction 2007, 511-551. Springer Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2nd ed.
52. Van Leeuwen C.J., Patlewicz G.Y., Worth A.P. Intelligent testing strategies. Risk assessment of chemicals. An introduction 2007, 467-509. Springer Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2nd edition.
53. Van Leeuwen C.J., Schultz T., Henry T., Veith G., Diderich B. Using chemical categories and QSAR to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. SAR QSAR Environ Toxicol 2009, 20:207-220.