Quantifying the effect of nanoparticles on As(V) ecotoxicity exemplified by nano-Fe2O3 (magnetic) and nano-Al2O3

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2870-2876

  Hu, Ji ^a,b   Wang, Demin ^a   Forthaus, Brett E ^a   Wang, Jianmin ^a  

^a Architectural and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

^b Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources   (China)

Author keywords

Arsenic; Ceriodaphnia dubia; Nano Al2O3; Nano Fe2O3 (m); Synergistic effect

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL FIELDS; CELLULAR LABELING; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CONCENTRATION RANGES; ECOTOXICITY; HUMAN HEALTH; INVERSE RELATIONSHIP; MEDIAN LETHAL CONCENTRATION; NANO-AL; NANO-FE; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; TOXIC CONTAMINANTS;

ALUMINUM; ARSENIC; DRUG DELIVERY; NANOPARTICLES;

TOXICITY;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARSENIC; IRON OXIDE; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; METAL NANOPARTICLE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARSENIC; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; CATALYST; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CRUSTACEAN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ECOTOXICOLOGY; IRON OXIDE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; TOXICITY TEST;

ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; ECOTOXICITY; LC 50; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE; ANIMALS; ARSENIC; DAPHNIA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; LETHAL DOSE 50; MAGNETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NANOPARTICLES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA;

EID: 84869868582     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311: 622-627.
2. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. 2005. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113: 823-839.
3. Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Alvarez P, Dionysiou D, Biswas P. 2006. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40: 4336-4345.
4. Baun A, Hartmann N, Grieger K, Kusk K. 2008. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: A brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology 17: 387-395.
5. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J. 2003. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36: R167-R181.
6. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN. 2008. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108: 2064-2110.
7. Brunner TJ, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Grass RN, Limbach LK, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. 2006. In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: A comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol 40: 4374-4381.
8. Pisanic TR, Blackwell JD, Shubayev VI, Fiñones RR, Jin S. 2007. Nanotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticle internalization in growing neurons. Biomaterials 28: 2572-2581.
9. Auffan M, Achouak W, Rose J, Roncato MA, Chaneac C, Waite DT, Masion A, Woicik JC, Wiesner MR, Bottero JY. 2008. Relation between the redox state of iron-based nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity toward Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol 42: 6730-6735.
10. Limbach LK, Wick P, Manser P, Grass RN, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. 2007. Exposure of engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells: Influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress. Environ Sci Technol 41: 4158-4163.
11. Schwegmann H, Feitz AJ, Frimmel FH. 2010. Influence of the zeta potential on the sorption and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles on S. cerevisiae and E. coli. J Colloid Interf Sci 347: 43-48.
12. Zhu X, Zhu L, Duan Z, Qi R, Li Y, Lang Y. 2008. Comparative toxicity of several metal oxide nanoparticle aqueous suspensions to zebrafish (Danio rerio) early developmental stage. J Environ Sci Heal A 43: 278-284.
13. Simon-Deckers AE, Loo S, Mayne-L'hermite M, Herlin-Boime N, Menguy N, Reynaud CE, Gouget B, Carrière M. 2009. Size-, composition- and shape-dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 43: 8423-8429.
14. Stanley JK, Coleman JG, Weiss CA, Steevens JA. 2009. Sediment toxicity and bioaccumulation of nano and micron-sized aluminum oxide. Environm Toxicol Chem 29: 422-429.
15. 2 to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Pollut 157: 1171-1177.
16. Zhu X, Zhu L, Chen Y, Tian S. 2009. Acute toxicities of six manufactured nanomaterial suspensions to Daphnia magna. J Nanopart Res 11: 67-75.
17. 2, and ZnO nanoparticles to human lung cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10: 3453-3458.
18. Heckmann L, Hovgaard M, Sutherland D, Autrup H, Besenbacher F, Scott-Fordsmand J. 2011. Limit-test toxicity screening of selected inorganic nanoparticles to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicology 20: 226-233.
19. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR. 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1825-1851.
20. 2 and As(V) on Ceriodaphnia dubia. Sci Total Environ 409: 1351-1356.
21. 2. Chemosphere 89: 536-541.
22. 3 and As(V) on Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Pollut 159: 3003-3008.
23. Cullen WR, Reimer KJ. 1989. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem Rev 89: 713-764.
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. EPA-821/R-02/012, 5th ed. Washington, DC.
25. Liu G, Wang D, Wang J, Mendoza C. 2011. Effect of ZnO particles on activated sludge: Role of particle dissolution. Sci Total Environ 409: 2852-2857.
26. Liu G, Wang J. 2012. Effects of nano-CuO and nano-MgO particles on activated sludge. Water Environ Res 84: 569-576.
27. 3 (magnetic) nanoparticles in Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environ Pollut 162: 216-222.
28. x). Environ Sci Technol 41: 4465-4470.
29. Griffitt RJ, Luo J, Gao J, Bonzongo J, Barber DS. 2008. Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1972-1978.
30. 2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Technol 43: 4537-4546.
31. 2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res 40: 3527-3532.
32. Xu XN, Brownlow WJ, Kyriacou SV, Wan Q, Viola JJ. 2004. Real-time probing of membrane transport in living microbial cells using single nanoparticle optics and living cell imaging. Biochemistry 43: 10400-10413.
33. Kloepfer JA, Mielke RE, Nadeau JL. 2005. Uptake of CdSe and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots into bacteria via purine-dependent mechanisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 2548-2557.
34. Rosenkranz P, Chaudhry Q, Stone V, Fernandes TF. 2009. A comparison of nanoparticle and fine particle uptake by Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 28: 2142-2149.
35. Bazkin A, Norde W. 2000. Physical Chemistry of Biological Interfaces. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.
36. Burns CW. 1968. The relationship between body size of filterfeeding cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnol Oceanogr 13: 675-678.
37. Geller W, Müller H. 1981. The filtration apparatus of cladocera: Filter mesh-sizes and their implications on food selectivity. Oecologia 49: 316-321.