Numerical simulation of large deformation in shear panel dampers using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Engineering Structures

Volumn 48, Issue , 2013, Pages 245-254

  Chen, Zhiyi ^a,b   Dai, Zili ^b   Huang, Yu ^a,b   Bian, Guoqiang ^b  

^a Tongji University   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cyclic shear test; Large deformation; Shear panel damper; Smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; BILINEAR MODELS; BRIDGE STRUCTURES; CIVIL STRUCTURE; CYCLIC LOADINGS; CYCLIC SHEAR; DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR; DISSIPATED ENERGY; EARTHQUAKE ZONES; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; IN-BUILDINGS; KINEMATIC HARDENING RULE; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; MESHFREE PARTICLES; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SHEAR PANELS; SIMPLE SHEAR TEST; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SPH METHODS; STRESS RATES; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; ENERGY DISSIPATION; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

BRIDGE; BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYCLIC LOADING; DAMPING; DEFORMATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SHEAR TEST; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84869864627     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Nakashima M., Iwai S., Iwata M., Takeuchi T., Konomi S., Akazawa T., Saburi K. Energy dissipation behavior of shear panels made of low yield steel. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 1994, 23(12):1299-1313.
2. McDaniel C.C., Uang C.M., Seible F. Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge. J Struct Eng - ASCE 2003, 129(6):801-809.
3. Ge H.B., Chen X., Matsui N. Seismic demand on shear panel dampers installed in steel-framed bridge pier structures. J Earthq Eng 2011, 15(3):339-361.
4. Mualla I.H., Belev B. Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation. Eng Struct 2002, 24(3):365-371.
5. Pinkaew T., Lukkunaprasit P., Chatupote P. Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures. Eng Struct 2003, 25(1):39-46.
6. Bharti S.D., Dumne S.M., Shrimali M.K. Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers. Eng Struct 2010, 32(8):2122-2133.
7. Chan R.W.K., Albermani F. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation. Eng Struct 2009, 31(4):1997-2008.
8. Housner G.W., Bergman L.A., Caughey T.K. Structural control: past, present, and future. J Eng Mech - ASCE 1997, 123(9):897-971.
9. Nonaka T., Usami T., Sakamoto Y., Iwamura M. Inelastic seismic behavior of deck type steel truss bridges under major earthquakes and a proposal for its seismic upgrading. J Struct Eng - JSCE 2003, 49A:531-542. (in Japanese).
10. Matsumoto N., Okano M., Arita H., Sogabe M., Wakui H., Ohuchi H., et al. Seismic behavior of railway viaducts with steel dampers and braces. J Struct Eng - JSCE 1999, 45A:1411-1422. (in Japanese).
11. Takahashi Y., Shinabe Y. Experimental study of restoring force characteristics of shear yielding in thin steel plate elements. J Struct Construct Eng 1997, 494:107-114. (in Japanese).
12. Chen S.J., Kuo C.L. Experimental study of vierendeel frames with LYP steel shear panels. Steel Struct 2004, 4:179-186.
13. Chan R.W.K., Albermani F., Williams M.S. Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. J Constr Steel Res 2009, 65(2):260-268.
14. Kim T.W., Wilcoski J., Foutchc D.A., Leed M.S. Shaketable tests of a cold-formed steel shear panel. Eng Struct 2006, 28(10):1462-1470.
15. Li Z.Y., Albermani F., Chand R.W.K., Kitipornchai S. Pinching hysteretic response of yielding shear panel device. Eng Struct 2011, 33(3):993-1000.
16. Lee S.C., Yoo C.H. Strength of plate girder web panels under pure shear. J Struct Eng - ASCE 1998, 124(2):184-194.
17. Chen Z.Y., Ge H.B., Usami T. Hysteretic model of stiffened shear panel dampers. J Struct Eng - ASCE 2006, 132(3):478-483.
18. Chen Z.Y., Ge H.B., Usami T. Numerical study on development of hysteretic model for stiffened steel shear panel dampers. J Struct Eng - JSCE 2006, 52A:573-582.
19. Chen J.K., Beraun J.E. A generalized smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for nonlinear dynamic problems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 2000, 190(1-2):225-239.
20. Lucy L.B. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J 1977, 82(12):1013-1024.
21. Wang Z.Q., Lu Y., Hao H., Chong K. A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast. Comput Struct 2005, 83(4-5):339-356.
22. Monaghan J.J. Simulating free-surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 1994, 110(2):399-406.
23. Monaghan J.J., Kocharyan A. SPH simulation of multiphase flow. Comput Phys Commun 1995, 87(1-2):225-235.
24. Cleary P.W. Modeling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH. Appl Math Model 1998, 22(12):981-993.
25. Xiong H.B., Chen L.H., Lin J.Z. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of free surface flow. J Hydrodynam 2006, 18(1):443-445.
26. Vazquez-Quesada A., Ellero M. SPH simulations of a viscoelastic flow around a periodic array of cylinders confined in a channel. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 2012, 167:1-8.
27. Libersky L.D., Petschek A.G. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials. Adv the Free Lagrange Method, Lect Notes Phys 1990, 395:248-257.
28. Randles P.W., Libersky L.D. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: some recent improvements and applications. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 1996, 139(1):375-408.
29. Johnson G.R., Petersen E.H., Stryk R.A. Incorporation of an SPH option into the EPIC code for a wide range of high velocity impact computations. Int J Impact Eng 1993, 14(1-4):385-394.
30. Cleary P.W., Prakash M., Ha J. Novel applications of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) in metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 2006, 177(1-3):41-48.
31. Karekal S., Das R., Mosse L., Cleary P.W. Application of a mesh-free continuum method for simulation of rock caving processes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2011, 48(5):703-711.
32. Lu Y., Wang Z.Q., Chong K.R. A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulations. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 2005, 25(4):275-288.
33. Huang Y., Dai Z.L., Zhang W.J., Chen Z.Y. Visual simulation of landslide fluidized movement based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nat Hazards 2011, 59(3):1225-1238.
34. Huang Y., Zhang W.J., Xu Q., Xie P., Hao L. Run-out analysis of flow-like landslides triggered by the Ms 8.0 2008 Wenchuan earthquake using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Landslides 2012, 9(2):275-283.
35. Huang Y., Zhang W.J., Mao W.W., Jin C. Flow analysis of liquefied soils based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Nat Hazards 2011, 59(3):1547-1560.
36. Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep Prog Phys 2005, 68(8):1703-1759.
37. Liu M.B., Liu G.R. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2010, 17(1):25-76.
38. Balsara D.P. Von Neumann stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics - suggestions for optimal algorithms. J Comput Phys 1995, 121:357-372.
39. Monaghan J.J., Gingold R.A. Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. J Comput Phys 1983, 52:374-389.
40. Morris JP. Analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with applications. PhD thesis, Monash University.
41. Johnson G.R., Beissel S.R. Normalized smoothing functions for SPH impact computations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1996, 39(16):2725-2741.
42. Liu M.B., Liu G.R. Restoring particle consistency in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Appl Numer Math 2006, 56(1):19-36.
43. Shao S., Incompressible S.P.H. Flow model for wave interactions with porous media. Coast Eng 2010, 57:304-316.
44. Monaghan J.J. SPH compressible turbulence. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2002, 335:843-852.
45. Chen J.K., Beraun J.E. A generalized smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for nonlinear dynamic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000, 199:225-239.
46. Chen J.K., Beraun J.E., Carney T.C. A corrective smoothed particle method for boundary value problems in heat conduction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1999, 46:231-252.
47. Liu M.B., Liu G.R., Lam K.Y. A one-dimensional meshfree particle formulation for simulating shock waves. Shock Waves 2003, 13(3):201-211.
48. Shapiro P.R., Martel H., Villumsen J.V., Owen J.M. Adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics, with application to cosmology: methodology. Astrophys J Suppl Ser 1996, 103(2):269-330.
49. Monaghan J.J., Lattanzio J.C. A refined particle method for astrophysical problems. Astron Astrophys 1985, 149(1):135-143.
50. Monaghan J.J. An introduction to SPH. Comput Phys Commun 1988, 48:89-96.
51. Evard A.E. Beyond N-Body: 3D cosmological gas dynamics. Mon Not R Astron Soc 1988, 235:934-991.
52. Ha H, Bui K, Sako. SPH-based numerical simulations for large deformation of geomaterial considering soil-structure interaction. In: The 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics (IACMAG), India; 2008. p. 570-8.
53. Liu G.R., Liu M.B. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a mesh-free particle method 2003, World Scientific Press, Singapore.
54. Wen Y, Hicks DL, Swegle JW. Stabilising SPH with conservative smoothing. Technical, report SAND94-1932; 1994.
55. Dyka C.T., Ingel R.P. An approach for tension instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Struct 1995, 57(4):573-580.
56. Monaghan J.J. On the problem of penetration in particle methods. J Comput Phys 1989, 82:1-15.
57. Monaghan J.J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 1994, 110(2):399-406.
58. Campbell PM. Some new algorithms for boundary value problems in smooth particle hydrodynamics. Technical report, Mission Research Corp., Albuquerque, NM; 1989.
59. Libersky L.D., Petschek A.G., Carney T.C., Hipp J.R., Allahdadi F.A. High strain Lagrangian hydrodynamics: a three dimensional SPH code for dynamic material response. J Comput Phys 1993, 109(1):67-75.
60. Govindjee S. Accuracy and stability for integration of Jaumann stress rate equations in spinning bodies. Eng Comput 1997, 14(1):14-30.