Structural building codes and communication systems

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 147-151

  Bulleit, William M ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING PERFORMANCE; DESIGN CODES; DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; ENCODING/DECODING; ONE-FORM; STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ENGINEERS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUILDING CODES;

EID: 84869849170     PISSN: 10840680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000136     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification, 4th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
2. Addis, W. (1990). Structural engineering: The nature of theory and design, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K.
3. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1971a). Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318, Detroit.
4. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1971b). Commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318, Detroit.
5. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318, Farmington Hills, MI.
6. ASCE. (1988). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-88, New York.
7. ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-10, Reston, VA.
8. Brenner, B. R. (2007). Don't throw this away!: The civil engineering life, ASCE, Reston, VA.
9. Bucciarelli, L. L. (2003). Engineering philosophy, Delft University Press, Delft, Netherlands.
10. Bulleit, W. M., and, Adams, D. K. (2011). Philosophy of structural building codes. Proc., SEI/ASCE Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
11. Chen, S. S., Aref, A. J., Chiewanichakorn, M., and, Ahn, I.-S. (2007). Proposed effective flange width criteria for composite bridge girders. J. Bridge Eng., 12 (3), 325-338. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:3(325)
12. Coeckelbergh, M. (2006). Regulation or responsibility? Autonomy, moral imagination, and engineering. Sci. Technol. Human Values, 31 (3), 237-260. doi:10.1177/0162243905285839
13. Elms, D. G. (1999). Achieving structural safety: Theoretical considerations. Struct. Safety, 21 (4), 311-333. doi:10.1016/S0167-4730(99) 00027-2
14. Galambos, T. V. (1992) Design codes. Engineering safety, D. Blockley., ed., McGraw Hill, London, 47-71.
15. Gleick, J. (2011). The information, Pantheon, New York.
16. Hess, R. L. (2009). Does the building code need simplification? Structure, 16 (10), 7.
17. Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer's approach to problem solving, Oxford University Press, New York.
18. Pierce, J. R. (1980). An introduction to information theory: Symbols, signals and noise, Dover, New York.
19. Shannon, C. E., and, Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
20. Shapiro, S. (1997). Degrees of freedom: Interaction of standards of practice and engineering judgment. Sci. Technol. Human Values, 22 (3), 286-316. doi:10.1177/016224399702200302