So Far So Good: Emotion in the Peripersonal/Extrapersonal Space

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Valdés Conroy, Berenice ^a   Román, Francisco J ^b   Hinojosa, Jose A ^a   Shorkey, S Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTIMACY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE STIMULATION; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL MEMORY;

EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONAL SPACE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84869842284     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049162     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Graziano MSA, Gross CG, Taylor CSR, Moore T (2004) A system of multimodal areas in the primate brain. In: Spence C, Driver J, editors. Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oxford University Press. 51-67.
2. Rizzolatti G, Scandolara C, Matelli M, Gentilucci M (1981a) Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 2, 125-146.
3. Rizzolatti G, Scandolara C, Matelli M, Gentilucci M (1981b) Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 2, 147-163.
4. Holmes NP, Spence C (2004) The Body Schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processes, 5, 94-105.
5. Bremmer F, Schlack A, Shah NJ, Kubischik M, Hoffmann K, et al. (2001) Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex, and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalences between humans and Monkeys. Neuron, 29, 287-296.
6. Brozzoli C, Gentile G, Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2011) fMRI-adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9023-9031.
7. Brozzoli C, Cardinali L, Pavani F, Farnè A (2010) Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 48, 796-802.
8. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305, 875-877.
9. Gentile G, Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2011) Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 910-922.
10. Makin TR, Holmes NP, Zohary E (2007) Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 731-740.
11. Macaluso E, Maravita A (2010) The representation of space near the body through touch and vision. Neuropsychologia, 48, 782-795.
12. Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A (1986) Unilateral neglect: personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia, 24, 759-67.
13. Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
14. Ladavas E, Farné A (2004) Neuropsychological evidence for multimodal representations of space near specific body parts. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxfrod University Press, Oxford 69-98.
15. Cardinali L, Frassinetti F, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Roy AC, et al. (2009) Tooluse induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19, R478-9.
16. Osiurak F, Morgado N, Palluel-Germain R (2012) Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 331-339. DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3036-5
17. Serino A, Bassolino M, Farné A, Ládavas E (2007) Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychological Science, 18, 642-648 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01952.x
18. Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
19. Coventry KR, Valdés B, Castillo A, Guijarro-Fuentes P (2008) Language within your reach: Near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition 108, 889-895.
20. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage, 6, 231-236.
21. Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
22. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2002) Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 149-154
23. Ellis R, Tucker M (2000) Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-471.
24. Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185-203.
25. Linkenauger SA, Witt JK, Stefanucci JK, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR (2009) The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1649-1660.
26. Witt JK (2011) Tool use influences perceived shape and parallelism: Indirect measures of perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1148-1156.
27. Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
28. Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Scorolli C, Borghi AM (2011) When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 302-308. DOI 10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4
29. McNair NA, Harris IM (2012) Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 71-77. DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3116-6
30. Carello C, Grosofsky A, Reichel FD, Solomon HY, Turvey MT (1989) Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1, 27-54.
31. Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106-112.
32. Gabbard C, Cordova A, Lee S (2007) Examining the Effects of Postural Constraints on Estimating Reach. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 242-246. DOI:10.3200/JMBR.39.4.242-246
33. Markman AB, Brendl CM (2005) Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6-10.
34. Hayes AE, Paul MA, Beuger B, Tipper SP (2008) Self-produced and observed actions influence emotion: The roles of action fluency and eye gaze. Psychological Research, 72, 461-472.
35. Ping RM, Dhillon S, Beilock SL (2009) Reach For What You Like: The Body's Role in Shaping Preferences. Emotion Review, 1, 140-150. DOI: 10.1177/ 1754073908100439.
36. Constable MD, Kritikos A, Bayliss AP (2011) Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119, 430-437.
37. Balcetis E, Dunning D (2010) Wishful Seeing: More Desired Objects Are Seen as Closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147-152.
38. Alter AL, Balcetis E (2011) Fondness makes the distance grow shorter: Desired locations seem closer because they seem more vivid. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47,16-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.018.
39. Ode S, Winters PL, Robinson MD (2012) Approach Motivation as Incentive Salience: Perceptual Sources of Evidence in Relation to Positive Word Primes. Emotion, 12, 91-101.
40. Fischer MH (2000) Estimating reachability: Whole-body engagement or postural stability? Human Movement Science, 19, 297-318. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0167-9457(00)00016-6
41. Bassolino M, Serino A, Ubaldi S, Làdavas E (2010) Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation, Neuropsychologia, 48, 803-811. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.009
42. Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880-888.
43. Ambrosini E, Scorolli C, Borghi AM, Costantini M (2012) Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1551-1557.
44. Linkenauger SA, Witt JK, Bakdash JZ, Stefanucci JK, Proffitt DR (2009) Asymmetrical body perception: a possible role for neural body representations. Psychological Science, 20, 1373-1380. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-280.2009.02447.x.