In vivo body composition in autochthonous and conventional pig breeding groups by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging under special consideration of Cerdo Ibérico

Animal

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2041-2047

  Kremer, P V ^a   Fernandez Figares I ^b   Fo Rster M ^a   Scholz, A M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Body composition; DXA; In vivo; MRI; Pigs

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD; SWINE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; FEMALE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEAT; SUS SCROFA;

ANIMALIA; CERDO; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SUIDAE;

EID: 84869836922     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001267     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albanese CV, Diessel E and Genant HK 2003. Clinical applications of body composition measurements using DXA. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 6, 75-85.
2. Allen P and Leymaster KA 1985. Machine error in X-ray computer tomography and its relevance to prediction of in vivo body composition. Livestock Production Science 13, 383-398.
3. B.O.E. 2001. Real Decreto 1083/2001, de 5 de Octubre, por el que se aprueba la Norma de Calidad para el jamón ibérico, paleta ibérica y caña de lomo ibérico elaborados en España.
4. Baulain U 1997. Magnetic resonance imaging for the in vivo determination of body composition in animal science. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 17, 189-203.
5. Brenøe UT and Kolstad K 2000. Body composition and development measured repeatedly by computer tomography during growth in two types of turkeys. Poultry Science 79, 546-552.
6. Carrapiso AI, Bonilla F and García C 2003. Effect of crossbreeding and rearing system on sensory characteristics of Iberian ham. Meat Science 65, 623-629.
7. Clemente I, Membrillo A, Azor P, Dorado G, Rodero A and Molina A 2006. Algunas consideraciones sobre las diferentes clasificaciones del tronco porcino ibérico: una propuesta integradora. Solo Cerdo Ibérico 16, 7-18.
8. Daza A, Olivares A, Rey AI, Ruiz J and López-Bote CJ 2008. Iberian pig production: the problems of success. In Options Méditerrané ennes, Series A, No. 78, http://ressources.ciheam.org/om/pdf/a78/00800259.pdf, pp. 163-171.
9. Dønnem I, EknæsMand RandbyÅ T 2011. Energy status, measured by computer tomography (CT)-scanning, and milk quality of dairy goats fed rations with various energy concentrations. Livestock Science 142, 235-244.
10. Fernández-Fígares I, Lachica M, Nieto R, Rivera-Ferre MG and Aguilera JF 2007. Serum profile of metabolites and hormones in obese (Iberian) and lean (Landrace) growing gilts fed balanced or lysine deficient diets. Livestock Science 110, 73-81.
11. Guo YM, Ai HS, Ren J, Wang GJ, Wen Y, Mao HR, Lan LT, Ma JW, Brenig B, Rothschild MF, Haley CS and Huang LS 2009. A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci for leg weakness and its related traits in a large F2 intercross population between White Duroc and Erhualian. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1569-1575.
12. Jackson PGG and Cockcroft PD 2007. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system - osteomalacia and osteoporosis. In Handbook of pig medicine (ed. PGG Jackson and PD Cockcroft), pp. 49-69. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA.
13. Kolstad K and Vangen O 1996. Breed differences in maintenance requirements of growing pigs when accounting for changes in body composition. Livestock Production Science 47, 23-32.
14. Kongsro J, Røe M, Aastveit AH, Kvaal K and Egelandsdal B 2008. Virtual dissection of lamb carcasses using computer tomography (CT) and its correlation to manual dissection. Journal of Food Engineering 88, 86-93.
15. Laenoi W, Uddin MJ, Cinar MU, Große-Brinkhaus C, Tesfaye D, Jonas E, Scholz AM, Tholen E, Looft C, Wimmers K, Phatsara C, Juengst H, Sauerwein H, Mielenz M and Schellander K 2011. Quantitative trait loci analysis for leg weakness-related traits in a Duroc3Pietrain crossbred population. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 13.
16. Lopez-Bote CJ 1998. Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. Meat Science 49, S17-S27.
17. Lösel D, Kremer PV, Albrecht E and Scholz AM 2010. Comparison of a GE Lunar DPX-IQ and a Norland XR-26 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scanner for body compositionmeasurements in pigs - in vivo. Archives Animal Breeding 53, 162-175.
18. Marcoux M, Faucitano L and Pomar C 2005. The accuracy of predicting carcass composition of three different pig genetic lines by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Meat Science 70, 655-663.
19. Mitchell AD, Conway JM and Potts WJ 1996. Body composition analysis of pigs by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2663-2671.
20. Mitchell AD, Scholz AM and Pursel VG 2001a. Total body and regional measurements of bone mineral content and bone mineral density in pigs by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2594-2604.
21. Mitchell AD, Scholz AM, Wange PC and Song H 2001b. Body composition analysis of the pig by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1800-1813.
22. Monziols M, Collewet G, Bonneau M, Mariette F, Davenel A and Kouba M 2006. Quantification of muscle, subcutaneous fat and intermuscular fat in pig carcasses and cuts by magnetic resonance imaging. Meat Science 72, 146-154.
23. Nieto R, Miranda A, García MA and Aguilera JF 2002. The effect of dietary protein content and feeding level on the rate of protein deposition and energy utilization in growing Iberian pigs from 15 to 50 kg body weight. British Journal of Nutrition 88, 39-49.
24. Pietrobelli A, Formica C, Wang Z and Heymsfield SB 1996. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism 271, E941-E951.
25. Rueda Sabater L and Diéguez Carbayo E 2007. Manual del Cerdo Ibérico.Aceriber, Badajoz, Spain.
26. Scholz AM 2002. In-vivo-Methoden zur Analyse von Muskelstoffwechsel und Körperzusammensetzung beim Schwein unter besonderer Berücksichtigung genetischer Einflüsse. Habilitation thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University.
27. Scholz AM and Förster M 2006. Accuracy of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the determination of the body composition of pigs in vivo [Genauigkeit der Dualenergie-Röntgenabsorptiometrie (DXA) zur Ermittlung der Körper-zusammensetzung von Schweinen in vivo]. Archives Animal Breeding 49, 462-476.
28. Scholz AM and Baulain U 2009. Methods of determination of body composition in living animals [Methoden zur Bestimmung der Kö rperzusammensetzung am lebenden Nutztier]. Zuechtungskunde 81, 86-96.
29. Serra X, Gil F, Pérez-Enciso M, Oliver MA, Vázquez JM, Gispert M, Díaz I, Moreno F, Latorre R and Noguera JL 1998. A comparison of carcass, meat quality and histochemical characteristics of Iberian (Guadyerbas line) and Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science 56, 215-223.
30. Suster D, Leury BJ, Ostrowska E, Butler KL, Kerton DJ, Wark JD and Dunshea FR 2003. Accuracy of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), weight and P2 back fat to predict whole body and carcass composition in pigs within and across experiments. Livestock Production Science 84, 231-242.
31. Szabo C, Babinszky L, Verstegen MWA, Vangen O, Jansman AJM and Kanis E 1999. The application of digital imaging techniques in the in vivo estimation of the body composition of pigs: a review. Livestock Production Science 60, 1-11.
32. Tejeda JF, Gandemer G, Antequera T, Viau M and GarcIa C 2002. Lipid traits of muscles as related to genotype and fattening diet in Iberian pigs: total intramuscular lipids and triacylglycerols. Meat Science 60, 357-363.
33. Tholen E, Baulain U, Henning MD and Schellander K 2003. Comparison of different methods to assess the composition of pig bellies in progeny testing. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1177-1184.