Business models and programming choice: Digital video Recorders shaping the TV industry

Association for Information Systems - 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2005: A Conference on a Human Scale

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 71-79

  Loebbecke, Claudia ^a   Radtke, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Business model; Digital video recorder; Programming choice; TV industry

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS MODELS; CHOICE MODELING; DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS; PRODUCT FEATURE; SATELLITE TV; TV STATIONS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; TELEVISION STATIONS; VIDEOCASSETTE RECORDERS; VIDEODISKS;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84869769815     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Afuah, A., Tucci, C. L. (2001) Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Cases, Boston, Mass., McGraw-Hill Irwin.
2. Allan, R. (2003) The TiVo Story Redefines Television viewing, Electronic Design, 13, 2, 41-46.
3. Amit, R., Zott C. (2001) Value Creation in e-Business, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 6, 493-520.
4. Beebe, J. (1977) Institutional Structure and Program Choices in Television Markets, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 91, 1, 15-37.
5. Bilotti, R. (2004) Attention Shoppers: DVD, PVR, and HD Outlook, Morgan Stanley Equity Research, January 8, 8.
6. Bird, W., Gupta, N., Krutick, J., Gilardi, R., Post, I., Ratcliffe, J. (2004) Digital Video Recorders - Soon Disruptive, but not apocalypse now, Smith Barney Equity Research, www.smithbarney.com (accessed January 28, 2005).
7. British Sky Broadcasting (2005) Press Release, February 2, media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/lse/bsy.uk/Press_release.pdf (accessed January 28, 2005).
8. C-Cubed (2002) The DVR Monitor - Wave III, Springfield, AUS, C-Cubed Corp.
9. Danaher, P., Mawhinney, D. (2001) Optimizing Television Program Schedules Using Choice Modeling, Journal of Marketing Research, 38 3, 298-312.
10. Decipher (2002) TiVo - No Killer-App But it Will Change the World, Decipher Five Futures Media Programme, 1-4.
11. DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) (1998) Pub.L.No. 105-304, 112 Stat, 2860.
12. Eisenmann, T. (2004) Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., Harvard Business School Case 9:804-191.
13. FCC (2002) Annual Report in the Matter of Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, 17 FCC.
14. FCC (2004) Annual Report in the Matter of Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for Delivery of Video Programming, MB Docket No. 03-172.
15. Gensch, D., Sharman P. (1980) Models of Competitive Television Ratings, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 3, 307-315.
16. Goettler, R., Shachar, R. (2000) Spatial Competition in the Network Television Industry, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnergie Mellon University, Working Paper No. 2000-E43.
17. Gomery, D. (2000) The Television Industries: Broadcast, Cable and Satellite, in: Who Owns the Media?, Compaine, B. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 193-284.
18. Henry, M., Rinne, H. (1984) Predicting Program Shares in New York Time Slots, Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 2, 9-17.
19. Hopkins, M. (2004) Industry Watches Comcast DVR Roll Out, www.skyreport.com/viewskyreport.cfm?ReleaseID=1550 (accessed February 7, 2005).
20. Horen, J. (1980) Scheduling of Network Television Programs, Management Science, 26, 4, 354-370.
21. Hotelling, H. (1929) Stability in Competition, Economic Journal, 39, 1, 41-57.
22. James, M. (2005) Looking for New Ways to Make Viewers Pay, Los Angeles Times, January 18.
23. Kelton, C., Schneider, L. (1998) Optimal Television Schedules in Alternative Competitive Environments, European Journal of Operational Research, 104, 3, 451-473.
24. Loebbecke, C., Falkenberg, M. (2002) A Framework for Assessing Market Entry Opportunities for Internet-Based TV, The International Journal on Media Management, 4, 2, 95-104.
25. Magretta, J. (2002) Why Business Models Matter, Harvard Business Review, 80, 5, 86-92.
26. Mandese, J. (2004) How much is product placement worth?, Broadcasting & Cable, December 13, www.broadcastingcable.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA487188 (accessed Nov 11, 2004).
27. McClellan, S. (2003) TiVO's Ad Friendly Claim Doesn't Sway Top Researchers, Broadcasting & Cable 7(7), www.broadcastingcable.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA309262 (accessed November 21, 2004).
28. Mogg, A. (2004) Limits of Free-TV, Presentation Mercer Consulting, Dept. of Media Management, Univ. of Cologne, June 1, 2004.
29. Myers, J. (2002) Consumer Interest in DVR-Features, March 22, www.jackmyers.com/pdf/03-27-02.pdf (accessed June 9, 2004).
30. National Cable Television Association (2004) Industry Overview Section, www.ncta.com/Docs/PageContent.cfm?pageID=86 (accessed October 14, 2004).
31. Noam, E. (1987) A Public and Private-Choice Model of Broadcasting, Public Choice, 55, 1-2, 163-187.
32. Owen, B., Wildman, S. (1992) Video Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
33. Picker, R. (2004) The Digital Video Recorder: Unbundling Advertising and Content, The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 1, 205-222.
34. Rao, B. (2001) Broadband Innovation and the Customer Experience Imperative, Journal of Media Management, 3, 2, 56-65.
35. Rappa, M. (2000) Managing the Digital Enterprise: Business Models on the Web, digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html (last accessed February 14, 2005).
36. Reddy, S., Aronson, J., Stam A. (1998) SPOT: Scheduling Programs Optimally for Television, Management Science, 44, 1, 83-102.
37. Rizzuto, R., Wirth, M. (2002) The Economics of Video on Demand: A Simulation Analysis, Journal of Media Economics, 15, 3, 209-225.
38. Rothenberg, J. (1962) Consumer Sovereignty and Economics of TV Programming, Studies in Public Communication, 4, 45-54.
39. Rust, R., Alpert, M. (1984) An audience Flow Model of Television Viewing Choice, Marketing Science, 3, 1, 113-124.
40. Rust, R., Eechambadi, N. (1989) Scheduling Network Television Programs: A Heuristic Audience Flow Approach to Maximizing Audience Share, Journal of Advertising, 18, 2, 11-18.
41. Spence, A., Owen, B. (1977) Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition and Welfare, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1, 103-126.
42. Steiner, P. (1952) Program Patterns and Preferences, and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 2, 194-223.
43. Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A. (2000) Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, Nicholas Brealy Publishing, London, UK.
44. Timmers, P. (1999) Electronic Commerce: Strategies and Models for Business-to-Business Trading, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
45. Turban, E., King, D., Warkentin, M., Chung, M. (2002), Electronic Commerce 2002: A Managerial Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
46. Waterman, D. (1990) Diversity and Quality of Information Products in a Monopolistically Competitive Industry, Information, Economics, and Policy, 4, 4, 291-303.
47. Wildman, S., Lee N. (1989) Program Choice in a Broadband Environment, Paper presented at Integrated Broadband Networks Conference, Columbia University.
48. Wildman, S., Owen, B. (1985) Program Competition, Diversity, and Multichannel Bundling in the New Video Industry, in: Noam, E. (ed.) Video Media Competition: Regulation, Economics, and Technology,Columbia University Press, New York.
49. Wiles, P. (1963) Pilkington and the Theory of Value, Economic Journal, 73(June), 183-200.
50. Zeisser, M. (2002) Marketing in a Post-TiVo World, McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition Technology, 89-92.