Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction Miniscrew implants versus rapid maxillary expanders

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1083-1091

  Ge, Yuan Shu ^a   Liu, Jin ^a   Chen, Lin ^b   Han, Jian Li ^a   Guo, Xin ^a  

^a Shenzhen Children's Hospital   (China)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Class III malocclusion; Maxillary protraction; Miniscrew implants

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84869760579     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/012912-76.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nartallo-Turley PE, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:217-224.
2. Hägg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie AB. Long term follow-up of early treatment with reverse headgear. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:95-102.
3. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:555-568.
4. Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:253-262.
5. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:571-577.
6. Kircelli BH, Pektas Zo. Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored facemask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133: 440-449.
7. Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, De Clerk H. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:799-806.
8. Şar C, Arman-Ozçirpici AA, Uçkan S, Yazici AC. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:636-649.
9. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F. Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions: a pilot study. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:639-646.
10. Lee NK, Yang IH, Baek SH. The short-time treatment effects of face mask in Class III patients based on the anchorage device. Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.2319/090811-584.1.
11. Ludwig B, Glas B, Bowman SJ, Drescher D, Wilmes B. Miniscrews-supported Class III treatment with the Hybrid RPE Advancer. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:533-539.
12. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Ludwing B, Kau CH, Drescher D. Early Class III treatment with a hybrid hyrax-mentoplate combination. J Clin Orthod. 2011;45:15-21.
13. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763-767.
14. Justens E, Bruyn HD. Clinical outcome of miniscrews used as orthodontic anchorage. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:174-180.
15. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrew in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:108-113.
16. Liou EJ, Chen P, Wang Y, Lin JC. A computed tomographic image study on the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest of the maxilla and its clinical implications for miniscrew insertion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131: 352-356.
17. Lin JJ. The new method of IZC miniscrew placement. Chin J Orthod. 2009;16:38-44.
18. Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:3-9.
19. Misch CE. Bone character: second vital implant criterion. Dent Today. 1988;7:39-40.
20. Misch CE, Kircos LT. Diagnostic imaging and techniques. In: Mish CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1999:73-87.
21. Melsen B, Peterson JK, Costa A. Zygoma ligatures: an alternative form of maxillary anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1998; 32:154-158.
22. Clerck H, Geerinckx V, Siciliano S. The zygoma anchorage system. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:455-459.
23. Lin JCY, Liou EJ. A new bone screw for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:676-682.
24. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:768-775.
25. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:18-25.
26. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:373-378.
27. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-YamamotoT.Clinical useof miniscrew implantsas orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:9-15.
28. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:333-343.
29. Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Den-tofacial Orthop. 1999;116:13-24.