Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Mazloumian, Amin ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; AUTHOR; CAREER; CITATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST;

AUTHORSHIP; CAREER MOBILITY; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE;

EID: 84869742004     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049246     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lehmann S, Jackson A, Lautrup B, (2006) Measures for measures. Nature 444: 1003-1004.
2. Cohen J, (2008) Where have all the dollars gone? Science 321: 520-520.
3. Lane J, Bertuzzi S, (2011) Measuring the results of science investments. Science 331: 678.
4. Bornmann L, Daniel H, (2005) Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. reliability, fairness and predictive validity of board of trustees' decisions. Scientometrics 63: 297-320.
5. Petersen A, Wang F, Stanley H, (2010) Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline. Physical Review E 81: 036114.
6. Jacob B, Lefgren L, (2007) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Boyack K, Börner K, (2003) Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the inuence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 447-461.
8. Payne A, Siow A, (1999) Does federal research funding increase university research output? Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois.
9. Man J, Weinkauf J, Tsang M, Sin J, (2004) Why do some countries publish more than others? an international comparison of research funding, english proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. European journal of Epidemiology 19: 811-817.
10. Weingart P, (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics 62: 117-131.
11. Hirsch J, (2007) Does the h index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 19193.
12. Hirsch J, (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America 102: 16569.
13. Lehmann S, Jackson A, Lautrup B, (2008) A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics 76: 369-390.
14. Bornmann L, Daniel H, (2009) The state of h index research. is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO reports 10: 2.
15. Egghe L, Rousseau R (1990) Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science.
16. Garfield E, Merton R (1979) Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, volume 8. Wiley New York.
17. Garfield E, (2006) Citation indexes for science. a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International journal of epidemiology 35: 1123-1127.
18. Radicchi F, Fortunato S, Castellano C, (2008) Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 17268.
19. Boyack K, Klavans R, Börner K, (2005) Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64: 351-374.
20. Mazloumian A, Eom Y, Helbing D, Lozano S, Fortunato S, (2011) How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes. PloS one 6: e18975.
21. Moed H (2005) Citation analysis in research evaluation, volume 9. Kluwer Academic Pub.
22. Petersen A, Jung W, Yang J, Stanley H, (2011) Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 18-23.
23. Amsterdamska O, Leydesdorff L, (1989) Citations: indicators of significance? Scientometrics 15: 449-471.
24. Leydesdorff L, (1998) Theories of citation? Scientometrics 43: 5-25.
25. Bornmann L, Daniel H, (2008) What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 64: 45-80.
26. Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson M, Van de Sompel H, (2005) Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information processing & management 41: 1462-1480.
27. Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Smith J, Luce R, (2005) Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management 41: 1419-1440.
28. Bornmann L, Daniel H, (2007) What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology 58: 1381-1385.
29. Petersen A, Stanley H, Succi S, (2011) Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists. Scientific Reports 1.
30. Bornmann L, Daniel H, (2005) Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics 65: 391-392.
31. Egghe L, (2006) An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter 2: 8-9.
32. Egghe L, (2006) Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69: 131-152.
33. Martin B, (1996) The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 36: 343-362.
34. Mann G, Yarowsky D (2003) Unsupervised personal name disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003-Volume 4. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 33-40.
35. Han H, Giles L, Zha H, Li C, Tsioutsiouliklis K (2004) Two supervised learning approaches for name disambiguation in author citations. In: Digital Libraries, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on. IEEE, pp. 296-305.