Cortical thickness of supratemporal plane predicts auditory N1 amplitude

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 1026-1030

  Liem, Franziskus ^a,b   Zaehle, Tino ^c   Burkhard, Anja ^b   Jäncke, Lutz ^a   Meyer, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Biological and Health Psychology   (Switzerland)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

auditory cortex; auditory evoked potential; event related potential; multimodal imaging; N1; surface based morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CORTICAL THICKNESS OF SUPRATEMPORAL PLANE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; ORGAN SIZE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869498434     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835abc5c     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Naatanen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24:375-425.
2. Meyer M, Baumann S, Jancke L. Electrical brain imaging reveals spatiotemporal dynamics of timbre perception in humans. NeuroImage 2006; 32:1510-1523.
3. Roth WT, Kopell BS, Tinklenberg JR, Huntsberger GE, Kraemer HC. Reliability of the contingent negative variation and the auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 38:45-50.
4. Walhovd KB, Fjell AM. One-year test-retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int J Psychophysiol 2002; 46:29-40.
5. Baumann S, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20:2238-2249.
6. Ott CG, Langer N, Oechslin MS, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians. Front Psychol 2011; 2:195.
7. Kü hnis J, Elmer S, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Musicianship boosts perceptual learning of pseudoword-chimeras: an electrophysiological approach. Brain Topogr 2012; doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0237-y [Epub ahead of print].
8. Pantev C, Roberts LE, Schulz M, Engelien A, Ross B. Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. NeuroReport 2001; 12:169-174.
9. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45:564-572.
10. Liegeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92:204-214.
11. Godey B, Schwartz D, de Graaf JB, Chauvel P, Liegeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112:1850-1859.
12. Yvert B, Crouzeix A, Bertrand O, Seither-Preisler A, Pantev C. Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11:411-423.
13. Obleser J, Scott SK, Eulitz C. Now you hear it, now you don't: transient traces of consonants and their nonspeech analogues in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16:1069-1076.
14. Zaehle T, Jancke L, Meyer M. Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features. Behav Brain Funct 2007; 3:63.
15. Lu LH, Dapretto M, O'Hare ED, Kan E, McCourt ST, Thompson PM, et al. Relationships between brain activation and brain structure in normally developing children. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19:2595-2604.
16. Harris KC,Wilson S, Eckert MA, Dubno JR. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed. Ear Hear 2012; 33:330-339.
17. Annett M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970; 61:303-321.
18. Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, et al. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000; 37:163-178.
19. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 1999; 9:179-194.
20. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 1999; 9:195-207.
21. Winkler AM, Kochunov P, Blangero J, Almasy L, Zilles K, Fox PT, et al. Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. NeuroImage 2010; 53: 1135-1146.
22. Frye RE, Liederman J, Malmberg B, McLean J, Strickland D, Beauchamp MS. Surface area accounts for the relation of gray matter volume to reading-related skills and history of dyslexia. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 2625-2635.
23. Zatorre RJ, Fields RD, Johansen-Berg H. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15:528-536.
24. Hyde KL, Lerch JP, Zatorre RJ, Griffiths TD, Evans AC, Peretz I. Cortical thickness in congenital amusia: when less is better than more. J Neurosci 2007; 27:13028-13032.
25. Zouridakis G, Simos PG, Papanicolaou AC. Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component. Brain Topogr 1998; 10:183-189.
26. Zatorre RJ, Belin P, Penhune VB. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6:37-46.