Erratum to Two Decades of Value Change: The Crystallization of Meritocratic and Egalitarian Beliefs in the Czech Republic (Soc Just Res, 10.1007/s11211-012-0164-9);Two Decades of Value Change: The Crystallization of Meritocratic and Egalitarian Beliefs in the Czech Republic

Social Justice Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 421-439

  Smith, Michael L ^a   Matějů, Petr ^b  

^a Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic   (Czech Republic)

^b Institute of Finance and Administration   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; Distributive justice; Egalitarianism; Meritocracy; Social stratification; Value change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869489574     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-012-0170-y     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1980). The dominant ideology thesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
2. Arneson, R. (2006). Luck Egalitarianism: An interpretation and defense. Philosophical Topics, 32, 1-20.
3. Arsenson, R. (2007). Desert and equality. In N. Holtug & K. Lippert-Rasmussen (Eds.), Egalitarianism: New essays on the nature and value of equality (pp. 262-293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Arts, W., & Gijsberts, M. (1998). After the velvet revolutions: Altered life-chances, fragile legitimacy, and split-consciousness in post-communist Eastern Europe. Social Justice Research, 11(2), 143-171.
5. Balcerowitz, L. (1991). Understanding postcommunist transitions. Journal of Democracy, 5(4), 75-89.
6. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Micro and macro justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 173-202). New York: Plenum.
7. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
8. Dahrendorf, R. (1990). Reflections on the revolutions in Europe. New York: Times Books.
9. Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth. American Sociological Review, 45, 955-971.
10. Della Fave, L. R. (1986a). The dialectics of legitimation and counternorms. Sociological Perspectives, 29, 435-460.
11. Della Fave, L. R. (1986b). Toward an explication of the legitimation process. Social Forces, 65, 476-500.
12. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
13. Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14. Eyal, G., Szelényi, I., & Townsley, E. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists. The new ruling elites in Eastern Europe. London: Verso.
15. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56-80.
16. Gerlitz, J.-Y., Mühleck, K., Scheller, P., & Schrenker, M. (2012). Justice perceptions in times of transition. Trends in Germany 1991-2006. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 263-282.
17. Gijsberts, M. (2002). The legitimation of income inequality in state-socialist and market societies. Acta Sociologica, 45(4), 269-285.
18. Huber, J., & Form, W. H. (1973). Income and ideology. New York: Free Press.
19. Jasso, G. (1998). Studying justice: Cross-country data for empirical justice analysis. Social Justice Research, 11(2), 193-209.
20. Kaltenhaler, K., Ceccoli, S., & Gelleny, R. (2008). Attitudes toward eliminating income inequality in Europe. European Union Politics, 9(2), 217-241.
21. Kelley, J., & Zagorski, K. (2004). Economic change and the legitimation of inequality: The transition from socialism to the free market in Poland and Hungary, 1987-1994. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, 319-364.
22. Kluegel, J., & Mason, D. (2004). Fairness matters: Social justice and political legitimacy in post-communist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(6), 813-834.
23. Kluegel, J., Mason, D., & Wegener, B. (Eds.). (1995). Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
24. Kluegel, J., Mason, D., & Wegener, B. (1999). The legitimation of capitalism in the postcommunist transition. Public opinion about market justice, 1991-1996. European Sociological Review, 15(3), 251-283.
25. Kluegel, J., & Matějů, P. (1995). Principles of distributive justice in comparative perspective. In J. Kluegel, D. Mason, & B. Wegener (Eds.), Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states (pp. 209-238). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
26. Kluegel, J., & Smith, E. R. (1981). Beliefs about stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 29-56.
27. Kluegel, J., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: American views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
28. Liebig, S. (2001). Lessons from philosophy? Interdisciplinary justice research and two classes of justice judgments. Social Justice Research, 14(3), 265-287.
29. Loveless, M., & Whitefield, S. (2011). Being unequal and seeing inequality: Explaining the political significance of social inequality in new market democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 239-266.
30. Mason, D. (1995). Justice, socialism, and participation in the postcommunist states. In J. Kluegel, D. Mason, & B. Wegener (Eds.), Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states (pp. 49-80). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
31. Mason, D., & Kluegel, J. (2000). Introduction: Public opinion and political change in the post-communist states. In D. Mason & J. Kluegel (Eds.), Marketing democracy: Changing opinion about inequality and politics in east central Europe (pp. 1-25). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Matějů, P. (1996). In search of explanations for recent left-turns in post-communist countries. International Review of Comparative Public Policy, 7, 43-82.
33. Matějů, P. (1997). Beliefs about distributive justice and social change. Czech Republic 1991-1995. Working Papers of the research project "Social trends" 6/1997. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
34. Matějů, P., & Lim, N. (1995). Who has gotten ahead after the fall of communism? The case of the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review, 3(2), 117-136.
35. Matějů, P., & Řeháková, B. (1997). Turning left or class realignment. Analysis of the changing relationship between class and party in the Czech Republic, 1992-1996. East-European Politics and Societies, 11(3), 507-547.
36. Miller, D. (2001). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. Oxford: Basic Books.
38. Okun, A. (1975). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39. Orkeny, A. (2000). Trends in the perception of social inequality in Hungary, 1991-1996. In D. Mason & J. Kluegel (Eds.), Martketing democracy: Changing opinion about inequality and politics in east central Europe (pp. 98-121). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
40. Przeworksi, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in eastern Europe and latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Rakowski, E. (1991). Equal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43. Ritzman, R. L., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1992). Life chances and support for equality and equity as normative and counternormative distribution rules. Social Forces, 70, 745-763.
44. Roemer, J. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. Scott, J., Matland, R., Michelbach, P., & Bornstein, B. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 749-767.
46. Sen, A. (1979). Inequality of What? The tanner lecture on human values. Stanford: Stanford University.
47. Sen, A. (1992). The equality of what? The tanner lecture on human values. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
48. Shepelak, N. (1987). The role of self-explanation and self-evaluation in legitimating inequality. American Sociological Review, 52, 495-503.
49. Smith, M. (2010). Perceived corruption, distributive justice, and the legitimacy of the system of social stratification in the Czech Republic. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(4), 439-451.
50. Vallentyne, P. (2003). Equality and justice. New York: Routledge.
51. Verwiebe, R., & Wegener, B. (2000). Social inequality and the perceived income justice gap. Social Justice Research, 13(2), 123-149.
52. Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 21-43.
53. Walzer, M. (1984). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
54. Wegener, B., & Liebig, S. (1992). Dominant ideologies and the variation of justice norms: A comparison of east Germany, west Germany, and the United States. In B. Wegener, D. Mason, & J. Kluegel (Eds.), Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states (pp. 239-262). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
55. Wegener, B., & Liebig, S. (1995). Hierarchical and social closure conceptions of distributive social justice: A comparison of east and west Germany. In J. Kluegel, D. Mason, & B. Wegener (Eds.), Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states (pp. 263-284). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
56. Wegener, B., & Liebig, S. (2000). Is the 'Inner Wall' here to stay? Justice ideologies in unified Germany. Social Justice Research, 13(2), 177-197.