High-throughput SNP-based authentication of human cell lines

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 308-314

  Castro, Felipe ^a,b   Dirks, Wilhelm G ^c   Fähnrich, Silke ^c   Hotz Wagenblatt, Agnes ^a   Pawlita, Michael ^a   Schmitt, Markus ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Department of Human and Animal Cell Lines ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

cell line; cross contamination; Luminex; MMR deficiency; multiplex cell authentication (MCA); SNP; STR profiling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSAY; CELL LINE; GENETIC DRIFT; GOLD STANDARD; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MISMATCH REPAIR; MULTIPLEX CELL AUTHENTICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; DNA MISMATCH REPAIR; GENETIC LOCI; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84869489259     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27675     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schmitt M, Pawlita M,. High-throughput detection and multiplex identification of cell contaminations. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: e119.
2. Boonstra JJ, van der Velden AW, Beerens EC, et al. Mistaken identity of widely used esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line TE-7. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 7996-8001.
3. Boonstra JJ, van Marion R, Beer DG, et al. Verification and unmasking of widely used human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 271-4.
4. Chatterjee R,. Cell biology. Cases of mistaken identity. Science 2007; 315: 928-31.
5. Drexler HG, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, et al. False leukemia-lymphoma cell lines: an update on over 500 cell lines. Leukemia 2003; 17: 416-26.
6. van Helden PD, Wiid IJ, Albrecht CF, et al. Cross-contamination of human esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines detected by DNA fingerprint analysis. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 5660-2.
7. Freshney RI,. Database of misidentified cell lines. Int J Cancer 2010; 126: 302.
8. Capes-Davis A, Theodosopoulos G, Atkin I, et al. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 1-8.
9. Lins AM, Micka KA, Sprecher CJ, et al. Development and population study of an eight-locus short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex system. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 1168-80.
10. Parson W, Kirchebner R, Muhlmann R, et al. Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations. FASEB J 2005; 19: 434-6.
11. Demichelis F, Greulich H, Macoska JA, et al. SNP panel identification assay (SPIA): a genetic-based assay for the identification of cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 2446-56.
12. DSMZ. Catalogue of human and animal cell lines. 2012. http://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-human-and-animal-cell-lines. html#searchResult.
13. Dirks WG, Faehnrich S, Estella IA, et al. Short tandem repeat DNA typing provides an international reference standard for authentication of human cell lines. ALTEX 2005; 22: 103-9.
14. Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 8012-17.
15. Castro FA, Haimila K, Sareneva I, et al. Association of HLA-DRB1, interleukin-6 and cyclin D1 polymorphisms with cervical cancer in the Swedish population-a candidate gene approach. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 1851-8.
16. Schmitt M, Bravo IG, Snijders PJ, et al. Bead-based multiplex genotyping of human papillomaviruses. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 504-12.
17. Schmitt M, Dondog B, Waterboer T, et al. Homogeneous amplification of genital human alpha papillomaviruses by PCR using novel broad-spectrum GP5+ and GP6+ primers. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 1050-9.
18. The-International-HapMap-C. The International HapMap Project. Nature 2003; 426: 789-96.
19. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2947-8.
20. Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, et al. Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals. Forensic Sci Int 2006; 164: 20-32.
21. Alston-Roberts C, Barallon R, Bauer SR, et al. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. Nat Rev 2010; 10: 441-8.
22. Dirks WG, Drexler HG,. Authentication of scientific human cell lines: easy-to-use DNA fingerprinting. Methods Mol Biol 2005; 290: 35-50.
23. Budowle B, van Daal A,. Forensically relevant SNP classes. Biotechniques 2008; 44: 603-8, 10.
24. Musgrave-Brown E, Ballard D, Balogh K, et al. Forensic validation of the SNPforID 52-plex assay. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2007; 1: 186-90.
25. Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Fang R, et al. SNPs for a universal individual identification panel. Hum Genet 2010; 127: 315-24.
26. Phillips C, Fang R, Ballard D, et al. Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2007; 1: 180-5.
27. Josephson R, Sykes G, Liu Y, et al. A molecular scheme for improved characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines. BMC Biol 2006; 4: 28.
28. Wellcome Trust. Cancer Genome Project. 2012. http://www.sanger.ac.uk/ genetics/CGP/Archive/.