Can social features help learning to rank YouTube videos?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7651 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 552-566

  Chelaru, Sergiu Viorel ^a   Orellana Rodriguez, Claudia ^a   Altingovde, Ismail Sengor ^a  

^a L3S RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; FEATURE SELECTION ALGORITHM; LEARNING TO RANK; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; VIDEO RETRIEVAL; VIDEO SHARING; YOUTUBE;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

WEBSITES;

EID: 84869477543     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35063-4_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y.Y., Moon, S.: Analyzing the video popularity characteristics of large-scale user generated content systems. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 17(5), 1357-1370 (2009)
2. Chapelle, O., Chang, Y.: Yahoo! learning to rank challenge overview. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track 14, 1-24 (2011)
3. Chelaru, S., Altingovde, I.S., Siersdorfer, S.: Analyzing the Polarity of Opinionated Queries. In: Baeza-Yates, R., de Vries, A.P., Zaragoza, H., Cambazoglu, B.B., Murdock, V., Lempel, R., Silvestri, F. (eds.) ECIR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7224, pp. 463-467. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
4. Cheng, X., Dale, C., Liu, J.: Statistics and social network of youtube videos. In: Proc. of IEEE IWQoS 2008 (2008)
5. Dang, V., Croft, W.B.: Feature selection for document ranking using best first search and coordinate ascent. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2010 Workshop on Feature Generation and Selection for Information Retrieval (2010)
6. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proc. of LREC 2006, pp. 417-422 (2006)
7. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., Sivakumar, D.: Comparing top k lists. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 17(1), 134 160 (2003)
8. Freund, Y., Iyer, R., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 933-969 (2003)
9. Friedman, J.H.: Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38(4), 367-378 (2002)
10. Geng, X., Liu, T.Y., Qin, T., Li, H.: Feature selection for ranking. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2007, pp. 407-414 (2007)
11. Hsu, C.F., Khabiri, E., Caverlee, J.: Ranking comments on the social web. In: Proc. of CSE 2009, pp. 90-97 (2009)
12. Joachims, T.: Training linear svms in linear time. In: KDD 2006, pp. 217-226 (2006)
13. Metzler, D., Bruce Croft, W.: Linear feature-based models for information retrieval. Inf. Retr. 10(3), 257-274 (2007)
14. Mohan, A., Chen, Z., Weinberger, K.: Web-search ranking with initialized gradient boosted regression trees. Journal of Machine Learning Research 14, 77-89 (2011)
15. San Pedro, J., Yeh, T., Oliver, N.: Leveraging user comments for aesthetic aware image search reranking. In: WWW 2012, pp. 439-448 (2012)
16. Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S., Nejdl, W., San Pedro, J.: How useful are your comments?: analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In: WWW 2010, pp. 891-900 (2010)
17. Thelwall, M., Sud, P., Vis, F.: Commenting on youtube videos: From guatemalan rock to el big bang. JASIST 63(3), 616-629 (2012)
18. Vavliakis, K.N., Gemenetzi, K., Mitkas, P.A.: A correlation analysis of web social media. In: WIMS 2011, pp. 1-5 (2011)
19. Yee, W.G., Yates, A., Liu, S., Frieder, O.: Are web user comments useful for search? In: Proc. of SIGIR 2009 Workshop on LSDS-IR (2009)