Capabilities, Contributive Injustice and Unequal Divisions of Labour

Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 580-596

  Sayer, Andrew ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Capabilities; Capability approach; Economic development; Inequality; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869468383     PISSN: 19452829     EISSN: 19452837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2012.693069     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aldridge, S. 2004. Life Chances and Social Mobility: An Overview of the Evidence Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London [http://www.swslim.org.uk/documents/themes/lt10_lifechances_socialmobility.pdf]
2. Alperovitz, G. and Daly, L. 2008. Unjust Deserts, New York: New Press.
3. Andresen, S., Otto, H.-U. and Ziegler, H. 2010. "Bildung as human development: an educational view on the capabilities approach". In Capabilities: Handlungsbefähigung und Vewirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft, Edited by: Otto, H.-U. and Ziegler, H. 165-197. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
4. Beynon, H. and Nichols, T. 2006. Patterns of Work in the Post-Fordist Era Vols I and II, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
5. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction, London: Routledge.
6. Bourdieu, P. 1996. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Cambridge: Polity.
7. Bourdieu, P. 2005. Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity.
8. Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. C. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London: Sage.
9. Cameron, D. 2008. "In praise of general well-being". In Do Good Lives Have to Cost the Earth?, Edited by: Simms, A. and Smith, J. 207-213. London: Constable.
10. Cameron, J. 2000. Amartya Sen on economic inequality: the need for an explicit critique of opulence. Journal of International Development, 12(7): 1031-1045. (doi:10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:71031::AID-JID7253.0.CO;2-9)
11. Carpenter, M. 2009. The capabilities approach and critical social policy: lessons from the majority world?. Critical Social Policy, 29(3): 351-373. (doi:10.1177/0261018309105175)
12. Charlesworth, S. (2000) A Phenomenology of Working Class Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Clarke, J. 2005. New Labour's citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?. Critical Social Policy, 25(4): 447-463. (doi:10.1177/0261018305057024)
14. Crompton, R. 2007. "Gender inequality and the gender division of labour". In In The Future of Gender, Edited by: Browne, J. 228-249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dean, H. 2009. Critiquing capabilities: the distractions of a beguiling concept. Critical Social Policy, 29(2): 261-278. (doi:10.1177/0261018308101629)
16. Dorling, D. 2010. Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists, Bristol: Policy Press.
17. Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. 1992. Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Equalities Review Panel. 2007. Fairness and Freedom: The Final Report of the Equalities Review London [http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/equalitiesreview/]
19. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Evans, G. 2006. Educational Failure and Working Class White Children in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
21. Feinstein, L. 2003. Inequality in the early cognitive development of British children in the 1970 cohort. Economica, 70: 73-97. (doi:10.1111/1468-0335.t01-1-00272)
22. Folbre, N. 1982. Exploitation comes home: a critique of the Marxian theory of family labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(4): 317-329.
23. Gomberg, P. 2007. How to Make Opportunity Equal: Race and Contributive Justice, Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Grover, C. 2010. Social security policy and vindictiveness. Sociological Research Online, 15(2): 8 (doi:10.5153/sro.2111)
25. Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26. Hinton, T. 2006. "Capability and gender inequality". In Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems, Edited by: Kaufman, A. 93-116. London: Routledge.
27. Hochschild, A. R. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Time, Metropolitan Books, New York.
28. Holland, B. 2008. Ecology and the limits of justice: establishing capability ceilings in Nussbaum's capabilities approach. Journal of Human Development, 9(3): 401-425. (doi:10.1080/14649880802236631)
29. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2007. Understanding Attitudes to Tackling Economic Inequality, [http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/attitudes-tackling-economic-inequality-full.pdf]
30. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2009. Political Debate about Inequality: An Information Resource, [http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/political-debate-economic-inequality-full.pdf]
31. Lane, R. E. 1991. The Market Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Lerner, M. 1980. The Belief in a Just World, New York: Plenum Press.
34. Leys, C. 2001. Market-Driven Politics, London: Verso.
35. Marmot, M. 2004. Status Syndrome, London: Bloomsbury.
36. Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1973. The German Ideology, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
37. Menon, N. 2002. Universalism without foundations?. Economy and Society, 31(1): 152-169. (doi:10.1080/03085140120109295)
38. Miller, D. 1992. Distributive justice: what the people think. Ethics, 102: 555-593. (doi:10.1086/293425)
39. Miller, D. 1999. Principles of Social Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Murphy, J. B. 1993. The Moral Economy of Labor, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Navarro, V. 2000. Development and quality of life: a critique of Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom. International Journal of Health Services, 30(4): 661-674. (doi:10.2190/10XK-UYUC-E9P1-CLFX)
42. Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Oakley, A. 1974. Housewife, London: A. Lane.
44. Okin, S. M. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family, New York: Basic Books.
45. Peck, J. 2001. Workfare States, New York: Guilford Press.
46. Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation, New York: Rhinehart.
47. Phelps Brown, H. 1977. The Inequality of Pay, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Robeyns, I. 2005. The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 93-114. (doi:10.1080/146498805200034266)
49. Sandbrook, R. 2000. Globalization and the limits of neoliberal development doctrine. Third World Quarterly, 21(6): 1071-1080. (doi:10.1080/01436590020012052)
50. Sayer, A. (1989) 'Post-Fordism in question', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, pp. 666-695.
51. Sayer, A. (2005) The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Sayer, A. (2008) 'Moral economic regulation in organizations: a university example', Organization, 15(2), pp. 147-164.
53. Sayer, A. (2011) Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
54. Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender, Sage, London.
56. Smith, A. 1776/1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
57. Tilly, C. 1998. Durable Inequality, Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
58. Walby, S. 1986. Patriarchy at Work, Cambridge: Polity.
59. Walby, S. 1990. Theorising Patriarchy, Cambridge: Polity.
60. Walby, S. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities, London: Routledge.
61. Walkerdine, V. and Lucey, H. 1989. Democracy in the Kitchen, London: Virago.
62. Wright, E. O. 2000. Class Counts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.