Non-conformable, partial and conformable transposition: A competing risk analysis of the transposition process of directives in the EU15

European Union Politics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 46-69

  König, Thomas ^a   Mäder, Lars ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Competing risk analysis; compliance; conformable transposition; enforcement; EU directives; European Union

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869428933     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: 17412757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116512447703     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bailer S.Bargaining success in the European Union: The impact of exogenous and endogenous power resources.European Union Politics. 2004;5:99-123.
2. Berglund S,Gange I,Waarden F.Mass production of law. Routinization in the transposition of European directives: A sociologicalinstitutionalist account.Journal of European Public Policy. 2006;13:692-716.
3. Borghetto E,Franchino F,Giannetti D.Complying with the transposition deadlines of the EU directives: Evidence from Italy.Revista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche. 2006;:7-38.
4. Börzel TA.Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical artefact?.Journal of European Public Policy. 2001;8:803-824.
5. Börzel TA,Risse TThe Politics of Europeanization. Featherstone KRadaelli CM, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:57-80.
6. Box-Steffensmeier J,Jones BSEvent History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
7. Carrubba CJ.Courts and compliance in international regulatory regimes.Journal of Politics. 2005;67:669-689.
8. Carrubba CJ,Gabel M,Hankla C.Judicial behavior under political constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice.American Political Science Review. 2008;102:435-452.
9. Ciavarini Azzi GEuropean Integration after Amsterdam: Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy. Neunreither KWiener A, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:52-67.
10. Dimitrakopoulos D.Learning and steering: Changing implementation patterns and the Greek central government.Journal of European Public Policy. 2001;8:604-622.
11. Duina F.Explaining legal implementation in the European Union.International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 1997;25:155-179.
12. Epstein D,O'Halloran SDelegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
13. Falkner G,Treib O,Hartlapp M, et alComplying with Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
14. Franchino F.Delegating powers in the European Community.British Journal of Political Science. 2004;34:269-293.
15. Giuliani MThe Politics of Europeanization. Featherstone KRadaelli CM, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:134-155.
16. Grambsch PM,Therneau TM.Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals.Biometrika. 1994;81:515-526.
17. Hartlapp M,Falkner G.Problems of operationalisation and data in EU compliance research.European Union Politics. 2009;10:281-304.
18. Haverland M,Romeijn M.Do member states make European policies work? Analysing the EU transport deficit.Public Administration. 2007;85:757-778.
19. Hille P,Knill C.'It's the Bureaucracy, Stupid': The implementation of the acquis communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999-2003.European Union Politics. 2006;7:531-552.
20. Jensen CB.Implementing Europe: A question of oversight.European Union Politics. 2007;8:451-477.
21. Kaeding M.In good times and bad: Legal transposition in the European Union. Assessing correlational and necessary/sufficient causation.German Working Papers in Law and Economics. 2006;Vol. 2006 (Article 29): 1-47.
22. Kaeding M.Lost in translation or full steam ahead.European Union Politics. 2008;9:115-143.
23. Kaufmann D,Kraay A,Mastruzzi MGovernance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996-2005. Washington DC: World Bank; 2006:.
24. Keele T.Proportionally difficult: Testing for nonproportional hazards in Cox models.Political Analysis. 2010;18:189-205.
25. Knill C,Lenschow A.Coping with Europe: The impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy.Journal of European Public Policy. 1998;5:595-614.
26. König T,Luetgert B.Troubles with transposition? Explaining trends in member state notification and the delayed transposition of EU directives.British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39:163-194.
27. König T,Luetgert B,Mäder LPaper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions. Grenada, Spain:; 2005:.
28. Lampinen R,Uusikyla P.Implementation deficit - Why member states do not comply with EU directives?.Scandinavian Political Studies. 1998;21:231-251.
29. Licht AA.Change comes with time: Substantive interpretation of nonproportional hazards in event history analysis.Political Analysis. 2011;19:227-243.
30. Luetgert B,Dannwolf T.Mixing methods: A nested analysis of EU transposition patterns.European Union Politics. 2009;10:307-334.
31. Mastenbroek E.Surviving the deadline: The transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands.European Union Politics. 2003;4:371-395.
32. Mbaye HAD.Why national states comply with supranational law: Explaining implementation infringements in the European Union, 1972-1993.European Union Politics. 2001;2:259-281.
33. Perkins R,Neumayer E.Do membership benefits buy regulatory compliance? An empirical analysis of EU directives 1978-1999.European Union Politics. 2007;8:181-207.
34. Prechal SDirectives in EC Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
35. Siedentopf H,Ziller JMaking European Policies Work: The Implementation of Community Legislation in the Member States. London: Sage; 1988:.
36. Simmons BAMobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press; 2009:.
37. Steunenberg B.Turning swift policy-making into deadlock and delay: National policy coordination and the transposition of EU directives.European Union Politics. 2006;7:293-319.
38. Sverdrup U.Compliance and conflict management in the European Union: Nordic exceptionalism.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2004;27:23-43.
39. Tallberg J.Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union.International Organization. 2002;56:609-643.
40. Thomson R.Time to comply: National responses to six EU labour market directives revisited.West European Politics. 2007;30:987-1008.
41. Thomson R.Opposition through the back door in the transposition of EU directives.European Union Politics. 2010;11:577-596.
42. Thomson R,Stokman FN,Achen CH, et alThe European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
43. Thomson R,Torenvlied R,Arregui J.The paradox of compliance: Infringements and delay in transposing European Union directives.British Journal of Political Science. 2007;37:685-709.
44. Treib O.EU governance, misfit, and the partisan logic of domestic adaption: An actor-centered perspective on the transposition of EU directives. Paper presented at the EUSA 8th International Biennial Conference; 2003Nashville, Tennessee; 2003.
45. Versluis E.Explaining variations in implementation of EU directives.European Integration online Papers (EIoP). 2004;8:.
46. Zhelyazkova A,Torenvlied R.The time-dependent effect of conflict in the Council on delays in the transposition of EU directives.European Union Politics. 2009;10:35-62.