A Mastery Rubric for the design and evaluation of an institutional curriculum in the responsible conduct of research

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1003-1021

  Tractenberg, Rochelle E ^a   FitzGerald, Kevin T ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

accountability; curriculum design; responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869395512     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.596923     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, J.R. 2005. Cognitive psychology and its implications, 6E, New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
2. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C., eds. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
3. Antes, A.L., Wang, X., Mumford, M.D., Brown, R.P., Connelly, S. and Devenport, L.D. 2010. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine, 85: 519-26.
4. Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy: Structure of the observed learning outcome, New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Bloom, B.S., ed. 1956. The taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain, White Plains, NY: Longman.
6. Bresciani, M.J. 2006. Outcomes-based academic and co-curricular program review, Sterling, VA: Stylus.
7. Brown, S. and Knight, P. 1994. Assessing learners in higher education, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
8. Devine, S.M., Daly, K., Lero, D. and MacMartin, C. 2007. Designing a new program in family relations and applied nutrition. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112(Winter): 47-57.
9. Diamond, R.M. 1998. Designing & assessing courses & curricula: A practical guide, Revised, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Heywood, J. 2000. Assessment in higher education, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
11. Kern, D.E., Thomas, P.A., Howard, D.M. and Bass, E.B. 1998. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Macrina, F.L. 2005. Scientific integrity, 3E, Washington, DC: ASM Press.
13. Marzano, R.J. 2001. Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. McDaniel, E. 1993. Understanding educational measurement, Madison, WI: William C. Brown.
15. McKeachie, W.J. and Svinicki, M. 2006. McKeachie's teaching tips, 12E, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Messick, S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2): 13-23.
17. Nathan, D.G. and Wilson, J.D. 2003. Clinical research and the NIH-A report card. New England Journal of Medicine, 349: 1860-5.
18. National Research Council. 2001. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. In Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. ed. J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. O'Donovan, B., Price, M. and Rust, C. 2000. The student experience of criterion-referenced assessment (through the introduction of a common assessment grid). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(1): 74-85.
20. Rest, J. 1986. Moral development: Advances in research and development, New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
21. Rust, C., Price, M. and O'Donovan, B. 2003. Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2): 147-164.
22. Schunn, C.D. and Anderson, J.R. 2001. "Acquiring expertise in science: Explorations of what, when, and how". In Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom and professional settings, Edited by: Crowley, K., Schunn, C.D. and Okada, T. 83-114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Steneck, N.H. 2007. Introduction to the responsible conduct of research-revised edition. http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/rcrintro.pdf (accessed 1 January 2010). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
24. Stevens, D.D. and Levi, A.J. 2005. Introduction to Rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning, Portland, OR: Stylus.
25. Tagg, J. 2003. The learning paradigm college, Bolton, MA: Anker.
26. Toohey, S. 1999. Designing courses for higher education, Philadelphia, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
27. Tractenberg, R.E., M.M. Gushta, S.E. Mulroney, and P.A. Weissinger. In review. A six-level cognitive complexity matrix for encouraging higher level thinking with multiple choice question writing.
28. Tractenberg, R.E., McCarter, R.J. and Umans, J. 2010. A mastery rubric for clinical research training: guiding curriculum design, admissions, and development of course objectives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1): 15-32.
29. Tyler, R.W. 1949. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Wolf, P. 2007. "A model for facilitating curriculum development in higher education: A faculty-driven, data-informed, and educational developer-supported approach". In Curriculum development in higher education: Faculty-driven processes and practices. New directions for teaching and learning, No. 112, Edited by: Wolf, P. and Hughes, J.C. 15-20. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31. Zimmerman, B.J. 2006. "Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs". In The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, Edited by: Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J. and Hoffman, R.R. 705-22. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.