Greenhouse gas and criteria emission benefits through reduction of vessel speed at sea

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 12600-12607

  Khan, M Yusuf ^a,b   Agrawal, Harshit ^a,b   Ranganathan, Sindhuja ^b   Welch, William A ^b   Miller, J Wayne ^a,b   Cocker, David R ^a,b  

^a University of California Riverside   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTAINER VESSEL; CRUISE SPEED; EMISSION FACTORS; EMISSIONS FACTORS; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; ENGINE LOAD; MASS EMISSIONS; MGO; PORT AUTHORITIES; REGULATORY AGENCIES; SULFUR CONTENTS; TIDAL CURRENTS; VESSEL SPEED;

CONTAINERS; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS OILS; GREENHOUSE GASES; NITROGEN OXIDES; OCEAN CURRENTS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; POLLUTION; REDUCTION; SAILING VESSELS; SULFUR;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CRUISE REPORT; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; NITROGEN OXIDES; PARTICULATE MATTER; REDUCTION; TIDAL CURRENT; VESSEL;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; AIR POLLUTION INDICATOR; ARTICLE; GREENHOUSE GAS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PARTICULATE MATTER; SEA; VELOCITY; VESSEL;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; CALIFORNIA; CHROMATOGRAPHY, ION EXCHANGE; COMMERCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GASES; MOTION; OCEANS AND SEAS; PARTICULATE MATTER; SHIPS; VEHICLE EMISSIONS;

EID: 84869393792     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es302371f     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. UNCTAD 2010. UnitedNation Conference of Trade and Development, (2010.
2. IMO. International Maritime Organization. Maritime Knowledge Centre. International Shippingand World Trade Facts and Figures, October (2009).
3. Corbett, J. J.; Fischbeck, P. S.; Pandis, S. N. Global Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Inventories for Oceangoing Ships J. Geophys. Res. 1999) 104, 3457-3470 (Pubitemid 29298425)
4. Oftedal, S. Air Pollution from Sea Vessels, European Federation for Transport and Environment, Secretariat: Rue de la Victoira 26, 1060 Brussels, Belgium, 1996.
5. CARB. Public Workshop Vessel Speed Reduction for Ocean-Going Vessels. Sacramento. September 2008; http://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/vsr/docs/ 090908speakingnotes.pdf.
6. Title 13 section 2299.3. California Code of Regulations.
7. EPA. Designation of North American Emission Control Area to Reduce Emissions from Ships: Regulatory Announcement, EPA-420-F-10-015, March 2010; http://www.epa.gov/nonroad/marine/ci/420f10015.htm.
8. Psaraftis, H. N.; Kontovas, C. A.; Kakalis, M. P. Speed Reduction as an Emissions Reduction Measure for Fast Ships. 10th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation. Fast 2009, Athens, Greece, October 2009.
9. Corbett, J. J.; Wang, H.; Winebrake, J. J. The Effectiveness and Costs of Speed Reductions on Emissions from International Shipping Transp. Res., Part D 2009, 14, 593-598
10. IMO. Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships. Second IMO GHG Study, 2009; http://www.shippingandco2.org/IMOGHGStudy-Second.pdf.
11. POLB. Emission inventory full report 2009 - Port of Long Beach, 2009; http://www.polb.com/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BloblD=7390.
12. ISO, ISO 8178-2. Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines: ExhaustEmission Measurement.Part-2: Measurement of gaseous and particulate exhaust emissions atsite. International Organization of Standardization, (1996).
13. Agrawal, H. In-use gaseous and particulate matter emissions from a modern ocean going container vessel Atmos. Environ. 2008) 42, 5504-5510
14. Agrawal, H. Emission measurements from a crude oil tanker at sea Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 7098-7103
15. International Organization for Standardization. 1 st ed. (8178-4), 1996.
16. Protection of the environment. Title 40. Section 86 and 89. Code of Federal Regulations.
17. Petzold, A. Physical Properties, Chemical Composition, and Cloud Forming Potential of Particulate Emissions from a Marine Diesel Engine at Various Load Conditions Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3800-3805
18. NIOSH. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods; National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
19. California Air Resources Board. Emissions Estimation Methodologyfor Ocean-Going Vessels. October (2005; http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/marine2005/ appd.pdf.
20. U.S. Environmental Portection Agency (USEPA). Current Methodologies and Best Practices in Preparing Port Emission Inventories: final report; April, 2009; http://www.epa.gov/sectors/sectorinfo/sectorprofiles/ports/ports-emission- inv-april09.pdf.
21. Agrawal, H.; Welch, W. A.; Henningsen, S.; Miller, J. W.; Cocker, D. R. Emissions from Main Propulsion Engine on Container Ship at Sea J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, 7
22. EEIA for Sierra Research, for EPA, Analysis of Commercial Marine Vessels Emissions and Fuel Consumption Data, Feburary 2000. Sierra Research Work Assignment Nos. 1-10. Patent EPA420-R-002.
23. POLA. The Port of Los Angeles. Port of Los Angeles Inventory of Air Emissions, 2009; http://www.portoflosangeles.org/DOC/REPORT-Air-Emissions- Inventory-2009.pdf.
24. Bowman, C. Kinetics of Pollutant Formation and Destruction in Combustion Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1975, 1, 33-45
25. Heywood, J. Pollutant Formation and Control in Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988; pp 567-667.
26. Nenes, A.; Pilinis, C.; Pandis, S. N. ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols Aquat. Geochem. 1998, 4, 123-152 (Pubitemid 29126367)
27. Fountoukis, C.; Nenes, A. ISORROPIA II: A Computationally Efficient Aerosol Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for K+-Ca2+-Mg2+-NH4+-SO42 - NO3 - - Cl - H2O Aerosols Atmos. Chem. Phys 2007, 7, 4639-4659
28. ISORROPIA; http://nenes.eas.gatech.edu/ISORROPIA.
29. Corbett, J. J.; Winebrake, J. J.; Green, E. H. Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 8512-8518 (Pubitemid 350276464)
30. Winebrake, J. J.; Corbett, J. J.; Green, E. H.; Lauer, A. Mitigating the Health Impacts of Pollution from Oceangoing Shipping: An assessment of Low-Sulfur Fuel Mandates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4776-4782
31. Khan, M. Y.; Giordano, M.; Gutierrez, J. Benefits of Two Mitigation Strategies for Container Vessels: Cleaner Engines and Cleaner Fuels Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 5049-5056
32. CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2008/fuelogv08/fuelogv08.htm; Appendix D, Table II-6-II-8.
33. Port of Los Angeles Inventory of Air Emissions-2010; http://www. portoflosangeles.org/pdf/2010-Air-Emissions-Inventory.pdf.