User acceptance of e-commerce technology: A meta-analytic comparison of competing models

Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 179-190

  Yayla, Ali ^a   Hu, Qing ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic Commerce; Internet; Meta Analysis; Technology Acceptance Model; Theory of Planned Behavior

Indexed keywords

BEST FIT; COMBINED TAM-TPB; COMPETING MODELS; EMPIRICAL DATA; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; HYBRID MODEL; META-ANALYSIS; MODEL FIT; PREDICTIVE POWER; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; USER ACCEPTANCE; USER TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84869382147     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
3. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Dorsey Press, Chicago
4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
5. Ajzen, I. and Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
6. Chang, M.K., Cheung, W. and Lai, V.S. (2005). Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information & Management, 43, 543-559.
7. Chau, P.Y.K. and Hu, P.J.H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719.
8. Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. 1st Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Davis, F. D. (1986). Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.
11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
14. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W. (2003). The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of AIS, 1(8), 1-30.
15. Gefen D, Straub D.W. and Boudreau M.C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of AIS, 4, Article 7.
16. Geyskens I, Steenkamp, J.E.M. and Kumar N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519-543.
17. Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn, P. P. and Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 171-195.
18. Harrison, DA, Newman, D.A. and Roth, P.L. (2006). How important are job attitude? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 305-325.
19. Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-15.
20. Hu, Q. and Dinev, T. (2005). Is spyware an Internet nuisance or public menace? Communications of the ACM, 48(8), 61-66.
21. Hunter, J. E. and Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. 1st ed. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
22. Hunter, J. E. and Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Hsu, M. and Chiu, C. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38, 369-381.
24. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W. Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23, 183-213.
25. King, W.R. and He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 74-755
26. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
27. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
28. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrated trust and risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
29. Pavlou, P. A. and Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-134.
30. Rigdon, E. E. (1998) Structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.) Modern methods for business research 251-294). Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
31. Rubin, D. B. (1990). A New Perspective on Meta-analysis. Russell Sage, New York, NY.
32. Saeed, K. A., Hwang, Y. and Yi, M. Y. (2003). Toward an integrative framework for online consumer behavior research: A Meta-analytic approach. Journal of End User Computing, 15(4), 1-26.
33. Silverstone, R. and Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (Silverstone, R. and R. Mansell, Ed.), p.44. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995a). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
35. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995b). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
36. Van der Heijden, H. (2000). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
37. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 45(2), 186-2004
38. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
39. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
40. Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Personal Psychology, 48, 865-885.