Forensic biometrics: From two communities to one discipline

Proceedings of the International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group, BIOSIG 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Meuwly, Didier ^a   Veldhuis, Raymond ^b  

^a NETHERLANDS FORENSIC INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC APPLICATIONS; BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY; FORENSIC APPLICATIONS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; INFERENCE MODELS;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 84869380246     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. [AF09] AFSP, Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Science and Justice, 2009(49): p. 161-164.
2. [Al08] Alberink, I., Obtaining confidence intervals and Likelihood Ratios for body height estimations in images. Forensic Science International, 2008(177): p. 228-237.
3. [Be12] Available from: www.beat-eu.org, consulted 07.07.2012.
4. [Be86] Bertillon, A., De l'identification par les signalements anthropométriques. Reprinted from Archives d'anthropologie criminelle et des sciences pénales. 1886, Paris: Masson.
5. [Br02] Brooks, M.A., Face-off. New Scientist, 2002. 175 (2399).
6. [BS01] Berry, J. and D.A. Stoney, History and Development of Fingerprinting, in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, H.C. Lee and R.E. Gaensslen, Editors. 2001, CRC Press: Boca Raton. p. 1-40.
7. [BTM12] Biedermann, A., F. Taroni, and P. Margot, Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: use of prior odds for missing persons identification. Investigative Genetics, 2012. 3: p. 1-2.
8. [Bu11] Budowle, B., et al., Use of prior odds for missing persons identification. Investigative Genetics, 2011. 2(1-6).
9. [CM00] Champod, C. and D. Meuwly, The Inference of Identity in Forensic Speaker Recognition. Speech Com., 2000. 31(2-3): p. 193-203.
10. [Co98] Cook, R., et al., A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science & Justice, 1998. 38(3): p. 151-156.
11. [DC08] Dessimoz, D. and C. Champod, Linkages between biometrics and forensic science, in Handbook of Biometrics, A. Jain, F. P, and A. Ross, Editors. 2008, Springer: New York. p. 425-459.
12. [Eu11] Europol, Europol Information Management: Products and Services, 2011, Europol: The Hague. p. 23.
13. [Ev98] Evett, I., Toward a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Science & Justice, 1998. 38(3): p. 198-202.
14. [Fi11] Firth, N., Face recognition technology fails to find UK rioters. New Scientist, 2011(2826).
15. [Ga92] Galton, F., Finger Prints. Macmillian and Compagny, London, 1892 [Reprinted Da Capo Press, New York, 1965], 1892.
16. [Go91] Good, I.J., Weight of evidence and the Bayesian likelihood ratio, in The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science, C.G.G. Aitken and D.A. Stoney, Editors. 1991, Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK. p. 85-106.
17. [GR06] Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., et al., Robust estimation, interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 2006. 20: p. 331-355.
18. [GR12] Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., et al. A Linguistically-Motivated Speaker Recognition Front-End through Session Variability Compensated Trajectories in Phone Units. in IDASSP 2012. 2012. Kyoto.
19. [Hi10] Hicks, T., et al., Use of DNA profiles for investigation using a simulated national DNA database: Part I. Partial SGM Plus1 profiles. Forens. Sci. Int.: Genetics, 2010. 4: p. 232-238.
20. [IHK11] Indovina, M., R.A. Hicklin, and G.I. Kiebuzinski, ELFT-EFS Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies: Extended Feature [Sets Evaluation #1], 2011, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Washington DC.
21. [In09] Interpol, Disaster Victims Identification Guide, 2009, Interpol: Lyon. p. 55.
22. [IR98] Inman, K. and N. Rudin, The origin of evidence. Forens. Sci. Int., 2002. 126: p. 11-16.
23. [JDN04] Jain, A., S. Dass, and K. Nandakumar, Soft Biometric Traits for Personal Recognition Systems, in Biometric Authentication, D. Zhang and A. Jain, Editors. 2004, Springer Verlag: Heidelberg. p. 1-40.
24. [Kr09] Krane, D., et al., Time for DNAdisclosure. Science, 2009. 326(18 December): p. 1631-1633.
25. [Le06] Van Leeuwen, D., et al., NIST and NFI-TNO evaluations of automatic speaker recognition. Comp. Speech and Lang., 2006. 20: p. 128-158.
26. [MD01] Meuwly, D. and A. Drygajlo. Forensic Speaker Recognition Based on a Bayesian Framework and Gaussian Mixture Modelling (GMM). in 2001, A Speech Odyssey-The Speaker Recognition Workshop. 2001. Crete.
27. [Me06] Meuwly, D., Forensic Individualization from Biometric Data. Science and Justice, 2006. 46(4): p. 205-213.
28. [Me10] Meuwly, D., ID management in 2020, 2010, ID.academy: The Hague. p. 21.
29. [Mn11] Mnookin, J.L., et al., The Need for a Research Culture in The Forensic Sciences. UCLA L. Rev., 2011. 58: p. 725-801.
30. [Ne06] Neumann, C., et al., Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Three Minutiae. J. For. Sci., 2006. 51(6): p. 1255-1266.
31. [NES12] Neumann, C., I.W. Evett, and J. Skerett, Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradig. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 2012. 175(2): p. 1-26.
32. [PG11] Plomp, M.G.A. and J.H.A.M. Grijpink. Combating Identity Fraud in the Public Domain: Information Strategies for Healthcare and Criminal Justice. in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on e-Government. 2011. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Academic Conferences International (ACI).
33. [RC07] Ramos-Castro, D., Forensic evaluation of the evidence using automatic speaker recognition systems, 2007, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain. p. 169.
34. [Re05] Reiss, R.A., Manuel du portrait parlé. 1905, Lausanne: Th. Sack.
35. [RWM06] Ribaux, O., S.J. Walsh, and P. Margot, The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: Forensic intelligence. Forensic Science International, 2006(156): p. 171-181.
36. [SK05] Saks, M. and J. Koehler, The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 2005(309): p. 892-895.
37. [SVN07] Singh, R., M. Vatza, and A. Noore, Intelligent biometric information fusion using support vector machine, in Soft computing in image processing: recent advances 2007, Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. p. 325-349.
38. [Ta06] Taroni, F., et al., Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. 2006, London: Wiley.
39. [Wh10] Whither Biometrics Committee of98 National Research Council, Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. J.N. Pato and L.I. Millett. 2010: The National Academies Press.