Monitoring on-going vision development in system change programmes

Journal on Chain and Network Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 125-136

  Taanman, Mattijs ^a   Wittmayer, Julia ^b   Diepenmaat, Henk ^c,d  

^a Institute for Social Innovation   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Actors Process Management   (Netherlands)

^d NYENRODE BUSINESS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Co production; Evaluation; Sustainable agriculture; Transition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869159810     PISSN: 15691829     EISSN: 22244662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/JCNS2012.x008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Artto, K., M. Martinsuo, H.G. Gemuenden and J. Murtoaro 2009. Foundations of programme management: a bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1): 1-18.
2. Borgstein, M.H., H. Leneman, L. Bos-Gorter, E.A. Brasser, A.M.E. Groot and M.F. van de Kerkhof 2007. Dialogen over verduurzaming van de Nederlandse landbouw; ambities en aanbevelingen vanuit de sector. Wageningen, Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur and Milieu, WOt-rapport 44.
3. Brunner, R.D. and T.W. Clark 1997. A practice-based approach to ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 11(1): 48-58.
4. Burton Swanson, E. and N.C. Ramiller, 1997. The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research. 8: 458-474.
5. Courtney, H., J. Kirkland and P. Vigueri 1997. Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75(6): 66-79.
6. Davies, R., 2004. Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change. Evaluation, 10(1): 101-121.
7. Davies, R., 2005. Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change: part II. Evaluation, 11(2): 133-149.
8. De Haan, J. and J. Rotmans, 2010. Patterns in transition: understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecast & Social Change, 78: 90-102.
9. De Wolf, P. and C.T. Hoogland, 2009. De Sjalon. Wat hebben we geleerd. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
10. Diepenmaat, H., 1997. Trinity, model-based support for mullti-actor problem solving, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
11. Diepenmaat, H., 2009. Een filosofie van de maatschappelijke praktijk. Parthenon, Almere, the Netherlands.
12. Diepenmaat, H., 2011. Multi-actor procesmanagement in theorie en praktijk. Parthenon, Almere, the Netherlands.
13. Dunn, W.N., 1988. Methods of the second type: coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7: 720-737.
14. Frantzeskaki, N. and J. de Haan, 2009. Transitions: two steps from theory to policy. Futures, 41: 593-606.
15. Georghiou, L. and M. Keenan, 2006. Evaluation of national foresight activities: assessing rationale,process and impact. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73: 761-777.
16. Grin, J., 2006. Reflexive modernization as a governance issue, or designing and shaping re-structuration. In: Voss, J.-P., D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp (eds.) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
17. Guijt, I., 2008. Seeking surprise: rethinking monitoring for collective learning in rural resource management. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
18. Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann and R.E.H.M. Smits, 2007. Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74: 413-432.
19. Hisschemöller, M., 1993. De democratie van problemen. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
20. Hoes, A., 2011. Inside the black box of agricultural innovation projects. Exploring the interactions between farmers, greenhouses, scientists, pigs & neighbhourhoods. Phd thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
21. Loorbach, D., 2007 Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
22. Loorbach, D., 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23(1): 161-183.
23. Meadowcroft, J., 2007. Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literatures of political science. European Journal of Political Research, 31: 427-454.
24. Molas-Gallart, J. and A. Davies, 2006. Toward theory-led evaluation: the experience of european science, technology, and innovation policies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1): 64-82.
25. Patton, M.Q., 2010. Developmental evaluation. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.
26. Pellegrinelli, S., 2002. Shaping context: the role and challenge for programmes. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3): 229-233.
27. Reason, P. and H. Bradbury, 2010. Action research. participative inquiry and research. Sage, London, UK.
28. Regeer, B.J., 2010. Making the invisible visible. Analysing the development of strategies and changes in knowledge production to deal with persistent problems in sustainable development. BoxPress, Oisterwijk, the Netherlands.
29. Regeer, B.J., A.-C. Hoes, M. van Amstel-van Saane, F.F. Caron-Flinterman and J.F.G. Bunders, 2009. Six guiding principles for evaluating mode-2 strategies for sustainable development. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(4): 515-537.
30. Ringold, P.L., B. Mulder, J. Alegria, R.L. Czaplewski, T. Tolle and K. Burnett, 1999. Establishing a regional monitoring strategy: the Pacific Northwest forest plan. Environmental management, 23(2): 179-192.
31. Rittel, H.D. and M.B. Webber, 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-169.
32. Rogers, P.J., 2008. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation, 14(1): 29-48.
33. Rotmans, J., R. Kemp and M. van Asselt, 2001. More evolution than revolution, transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1): 15-31.
34. Sanderson, I., 2000. Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation, 6(4): 433-454.
35. Smith, A., A. Stirling and F. Berkhout, 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10): 1491-1510.
36. Smits, R. and S. Kuhlmann, 2004. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2): 4-32.
37. Sondeijker, S., J. Geurts, J. Rotmans and A. Tukker, 2006. Imagining sustainability: the added value of transition scenarios in transition management. Foresight, 8(5): 15-30.
38. Stame, N., 2004. Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation 10(1): 58-76.
39. TransForum, 2007. Midterm review: self-evaluation TransForum. TransForum/De Beuk, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
40. TransForum, 2008b Van 'transitie duurzame landbouw' naar 'shared value development for metropolitan agriculture'. Werkplan TransForum 2008-2010. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
41. TransForum, 2009. Jaarverslag TransForum 2008. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
42. TransForum, 2010a. Landbouw en stad: een duurzaam samenspel. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
43. TransForum, 2010c. Annual report TransForum 2009. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
44. Van Buuren, M.W., M.J. Buijs and G.R. Teisman, 2010. Program management and the creative art of coopetition: dealing with potential tensions and synergies between spatial development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7): 672-682.
45. Van den Bosch, S., 2010. Transition experiments, experiments that can contribute to sustainability transitions. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
46. Van der Helm, R., 2009. The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures, 41: 96-104.
47. Van Latesteijn, H.C., A. Veldkamp, A.C. Altvorst, P.J. van, Beers, H. de Boon, R. Eweg, A. Fischer, E. Jacobsen, A. van Kleef, S. Mager, H. Mommaas, P.J.A.M. Smeets, L. Spaans and J.C.M. van Trijp, 2008. TransForum: organizing the transition towards metropolitan agriculture. TransForum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands. Available at: http://www.transforum.nl/en/images/stories/ presentaties/tf-organizing-ma-v2-hvl.pdf.
48. Van Mierlo, B., M. Arkesteijn and C. Leeuwis, 2010. Enhancing the reflexivity of system innovation projects with system analyses. American Journal of Evaluation, 31: 143-161.
49. Weaver, P.M. and J. Rotmans, 2006. Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? International journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4): 284-303.
50. Weber, E.P. and A.M. Khademian, 2008. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2): 334-349.
51. Wittmayer, J., H. Diepenmaat and S. Mager, 2009a. Transitiemonitoring 2008-2009 ten behoeve van TransForum. DRIFT Erasmus University/TransForum, Rotterdam/Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
52. Wittmayer, J., H. Diepenmaat, S. Mager and K. Andeweg, 2010a. Metropolitane landbouw vergeleken. Transitiemonitoring TransForum 2009-2010. DRIFT Erasmus University/TransForum, Rotterdam/Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
53. Wittmayer, J., H. Diepenmaat, S. Mager and K. Andeweg, 2010b. Metropolitane landbouw in 16 punten. Transitiemonitoring TransForum 2010. DRIFT Erasmus University/TransForum, Rotterdam/Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
54. Wittmayer, J., N. Bressers and H. Diepenmaat, 2009b. Sturen op duurzame mobiliteit! Transitiemonitoring bij Transumo. DRIFT Erasmus University/ Transumo, Rotterdam/Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.