Researcher's attitudes towards open access and institutional repositories: A methodological study for developing a survey form directed to researchers in business schools

Open Scholarship: Authority, Community, and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2.0 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 15-22

  Hedlund, Turid ^a  

^a HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

End user attitudes; Methodological study; Web survey

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS SCHOOLS; COMMUNICATION PRACTICES; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; DIGITAL ERA; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; END USERS; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; METHODOLOGICAL STUDY; MODEL FRAMEWORK; OPEN ACCESS; ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY; RESEARCH APPROACH; RESEARCH PROBLEMS; RESEARCH RESULTS; SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS; THEORETICAL MODELS; USER ACCEPTANCE; USER ATTITUDES; USER BEHAVIORS; WEB SURVEYS;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING; INFORMATION SERVICES; RESEARCH; SURVEYS; SYSTEMS SCIENCE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84869146810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Nicholas, D. and Rowlands, I. Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 31(3) 2005: 179-181.
2. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Rowlands, I. Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors. Journal of Documentation vol 61(4) 2005: 497-519.
3. Swan, A. and Brown, S. Authors and open access publishing. Learned publishing vol. 13(3) 2004: 219-224.
4. Schroter, S., Tite, L. and Smith, R. Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. British Medical Journal 2005; (330); 756-published 26 January 2005.
5. Thomas, C. and McDonald, R. H. Measuring and comparing participation patterns in digital repositories: Repositories by the numbers, Part 1. D-Lib Magazine 2007; vol 13(9/19). Doi:10.1045/september2007-mcdonald
6. McDowell, C. S. Evaluating institutional repository deployment in American Academe since early 2005. Repositories by the number part 2. D-Lib Magazine 2007; vol 13(9/10) doi:10.1045/september2007-mcdowell
7. Davis, P. M. and Connolly, M. J. L. Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine 2007; vol 13(3/4) doi:10.1045/march2007-davis
8. Whitley, R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. London: Clarendon Press 1984.
9. Fry, J. Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach. Information processing and management 2006; vol 42, pp 299-316.
10. Fry, J. and Talja, S. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of information Science 2007; vol 33(2) pp. 115-133.
11. Hedlund and Roos, A. Open Access publishing as a discipline specific way of scientific communication: the case of biomedical research in Finland. In Advances in Library Administration and Organization 25. Elsevier book series 2007.
12. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003; vol. 27(3), pp. 425-478.