Understanding the process of constructing scales inventories in the process modelling domain

Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 2014-2025

  Recker, Jan ^a   Rosemann, Michael ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Empirical research; Perception measurement; Process modelling

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; DEVELOPMENT APPROACH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MULTI-STAGE; PROCESS MODELLING; RESEARCH DOMAINS; RESEARCH TOOLS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS ENGINEERING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84869145437     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
2. Ambler, S. W. (2004) The object primer: Agile model-driven development with uml 2.0. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, England.
3. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, England. Anastasi, A. (1986) Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology 37 (1), 1-15.
4. Bandara, W., Gable, G. G. and Rosemann, M. (2005) Factors and measures of business process modelling: Model building through a multiple case study. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (4), 347-360.
5. Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1970) Reliability and validity assessment in attitude measurement. In Attitude measurement (Summers, G. F., Ed), pp 80-99, Rand-McNally, Chicago, Illinois.
6. Bpmi.Org and Omg (2006) Business process modeling notation specification. Final adopted specification. Object Management Group.
7. Bubenko, J. A. (1986) Information systems methodologies-a research view. In Information systems design methodologies: Improving the practice (Olle, T. W. and Sol, H. G. and Verrijn-Stuart, A. A., Eds), pp 289-318, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
8. Burton-Jones, A. and Straub, D. W. (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research 17 (3), 228-246.
9. Chau, P. Y. K. (1996) An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (2), 185-204.
10. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I. and Over, J. (1992) Process modeling. Communications of the ACM 35 (9), 75-90.
11. Davenport, T. H. (1993) Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
12. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M. and Gallo, S. (2006) How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 (3), 358-380.
13. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319-340.
14. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8), 982-1003.
15. De Vaus, D. A. (2001) Surveys in social research. Taylor & Francis Books, London, England.
16. Dickson, G. W., Leitheser, R. L., Wetherbe, J. C. and Nechis, M. (1984) Key information systems issues for the 1980's. MIS Quarterly 8 (3), 135-159.
17. Doll, W. J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1991) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: Theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly 15 (1), 5-10.
18. Doll, W. J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1998) Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information & Management 33 (4), 171-185.
19. Fichman, R. G. (1992) Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. In 13th International Conference on Information Systems (De Gross, J. I. and Becker, J. D. and Elam, J. J., Eds), pp 195-206, Association for Information Systems, Dallas, Texas.
20. Froehle, C. M. and Roth, A. V. (2004) New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management 22 (1), 1-21.
21. Grover, V., Lee, C. C. and Durand, D. (1993) Analyzing methodological rigor of mis survey research from 1980-1989. Information & Management 24 (6), 305-317.
22. Karimi, J. (1988) Strategic planning for information systems: Requirements and information engineering methods. Journal of Management Information Systems 4 (4), 5-24.
23. King, W. R. and He, J. (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43 (6), 740-755.
24. Kung, C. H. and Sølvberg, A. (1986) Activity modeling and behavior modeling of information systems. In Information systems design methodologies: Improving the practice (Olle, T. W. and Sol, H. G. and Verrijn-Stuart, A. A., Eds), pp 145-171, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
25. Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R. W. (1987) Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In Critical issues in information systems research (Boland, R. J. and Hirschheim, R., Eds), pp 227-251, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
26. Lee, A. S. (2001) Editor's comments. Mis quarterly's editorial policies and practices. MIS Quarterly 25 (01), iii-vii.
27. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. and Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the AIS 12 (50), 752-780.
28. Mcgrath, J. E. (1981) Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25 (2), 179-210.
29. Moody, D. L. (2003) The method evaluation model: A theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In 11th European Conference on Information Systems, Naples, Italy.
30. Moody, D. L. (2005) Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 15 (3), 243-276.
31. Moore, G. C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (3), 192-222.
32. Mylopoulos, J. (1992) Conceptual modelling and telos. In Conceptual modelling, databases, and case: An integrated view of information system development (Loucopoulos, P. and Zicari, R., Eds), pp 49-68, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
33. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
34. Rescher, N. (1973) The primacy of practice. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
35. Segars, A. H. and Grover, V. (1993) Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly 17 (4), 517-525.
36. Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. W. (1967) Attitudes as the individual's own categories: The social-judgment approach to attitude and attitude change. In Attitude, ego-involvement and change (Sherif, C. W. and Sherif, M., Eds), pp 105-139, Wiley, New York, New York.
37. Siau, K. (2004) Informational and computational equivalence in comparing information modeling methods. Journal of Database Management 15 (1), 73-86.
38. Straub, D. W. (1989) Validating instruments in mis research. MIS Quarterly 13 (2), 147-169.
39. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences 27 (3), 451-481.
40. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 (2), 186-204.
41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425-478.
42. Wand, Y. and Weber, R. (2002) Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling-a research agenda. Information Systems Research 13 (4), 363-376.
43. Weber, R. (2003) Conceptual modelling and ontology: Possibilities and pitfalls. Journal of Database Management 14 (3), 1-20.
44. Zmud, R. W. and Boynton, A. C. (1991) Survey measures and instruments in mis: Inventory and appraisal. In The information systems research challenge: Survey research methods (Kraemer, K. L., Ed), pp 149-180, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.