Managing Negotiation Knowledge: From negotiation support to online dispute resolution

Proceedings of the 2nd International ODR Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 11-22

  Bellucci, Emilia ^a   Zeleznikow, John ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

NEGOTIATION SUPPORT; NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ON-LINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; PREFERENCE ELICITATION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84869137517     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bellucci, E. 2004. Developing Compensation Strategies for the construction of Negotiation Decision Support Systems. PHD thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Victoria, Australia
2. Bellucci, E. and Zeleznikow, J. 1998. A comparative study of negotiation decision support systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, Cal., IEEE Computer Society: 254-262.
3. Bellucci, E. and Zeleznikow, J. 2001. Representations for decision making support in negotiation. Journal of Decision Support. 10(3-4): 449-479.
4. Brams, S. J. and Taylor, A. D. 1996. Fair Division, From cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5. Clark, E. and Hoyle, A. 2002. Online Dispute Resolution: Present Realities and Future Prospects, 17th Bileta Conference, Amsterdam Fisher, R. and Ury, W. 1981. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Boston: Haughton Mifflin.
6. Hall, M. J. J., Calabro, D., Sourdin, T., Stranieri, A. and Zeleznikow, J. 2005. Supporting discretionary decision making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction. To appear in University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal.
7. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.J. and Sierra, C. 2001. Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges, Group Decision and Negotiation, 10 (2): 199-215.
8. Kersten, G. E. 1997. Support for Group Decisions and Negotiations, in: J. Climaco (Ed.) An Overview, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Support, (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag).
9. Khandelwal, V.K. and Gottschalk, P. 2003. Information Technology Support for Interorganizational Knowledge Transfer: An Empirical Study of Law Firms in Norway and Australia, Information Resource Management Journal, 16(1):14-23
10. Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. 2001. Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Ca.
11. Lodder, A. R. 1999. DiaLaw - on legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation (LAPS Vol. 42), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Lodder, A. R. and Zeleznikow, J. 2005. Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Three Step Model, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, to appear.
13. Mnookin, R., Peppet, S. R. and Tulumello, A. S. 2000. Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes, The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
14. Nash, J. F. 1953. Two person co-operative games. Econometrica, 21:128-140.
15. Pruitt, D. G. and Carnevale, P. J. 1993. Negotiation in Social Conflict, Open University Press, Buckingham.
16. Raiffa, H. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.
17. Rodríguez Morcón,C., Pérez García,J. and Sigüenza Pizarro, J. A. 2002. Knowledge Management in a Law Firm, UPGRADE (www.upgrade-cepis.org) 3(1):51-55
18. Ross, H.L. 1980. Settled Out of Court, Aldine.
19. Solovay, N. and Reed, C.K. 2003, The internet and dispute resolution untangling the web, Law Journal Press, New York.
20. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M. and Lewis, B. 1999. A Hybrid rule- neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3): 153-183.
21. Sycara, K. 1998., Multiagent Systems, AI Magazine 19(2):79-92.
22. Thiessen, Ernest M. and McMahon, Joseph P. 2000. Beyond Win-Win in Cyberspace. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 15: 643.
23. Thompson, L. 1990. Negotiation Behaviour and Outcomes: Empirical Evidence and Theo- retical Issues, Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
24. Van Velthoven, B.C.J. and Ter Voert, M.J. 2004, Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2003 The Hague: WODC/Boom
25. Waterman, D.A. and Peterson, M. 1980., Rulebased models of legal expertise. In the Proceedings of the First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University: AAAI: 272-275.
26. Waterman, D. A., Paul, J. and Peterson, M. (1986), Expert systems for legal decision making, Expert Systems 3 (4): 212-226.
27. Wertheim, E., Love, A., Littlefield, L. and Peck, C. (1992) I Win: You Win. Penguin Books, Ringwood, Victoria, pp. 130-135.
28. Williams, G.R., 1983, Legal Negotiation and Settlement, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota
29. Yuan, Y., Rose, B. J., Archer, N. and Suarga, H. (1998) A Web-Based Negotiation Support System, EM - Electronic Markets, 8.
30. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E. (2004), Building negotiation decision support systems by integrating game theory and heuristics. Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Monash University, Melbourne Australia.